The Cherepovets Higher Military School trains army command specialists. Complete education programs last 5 years, secondary education lasts 2 years and 10 months. During their studies, cadets are on full government pay. Applicants are accepted based on the results of the Unified State Examination and test physical exercises.

Story

The Higher Military Engineering School of Radio Electronics (Cherepovets) was opened on the material and technical base of the disbanded military infantry school (Lepel) in October 1957. Until 1970, cadets received education for three years.

Later, the educational institution was transferred to the status of a higher command school, where professions were taught for 4 years. In 1974, the program became more complex, which was associated with the transfer of the educational process into the mainstream of engineering training of military personnel. Since 1998, the university has been graduating military engineers in the field of radio electronics.

Faculties

The full course of military training lasts five years; graduates leave the university with the rank of lieutenant. The recruitment takes place in accordance with the order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Over all the years of activity, more than 13 thousand officers graduated from the Cherepovets Higher Military Engineering School of Radio Electronics.

Faculties:

• Engineering.
• Command
• Automated control systems.
• Radio communications.

Education and training of specialists take place on a modern material and technical base; the state provides cadets with everything necessary for living within the walls of the university. This and much more makes the Cherepovets Higher Military Engineering School of Radio Electronics popular.

Specialties

The university implements the following programs of higher military education:

• "Special radio engineering systems."
• "Special organizational and technical systems."
• “Automated systems for special purposes, application and operation.”
• "Information security of automated systems."

The duration of training is 5 years, graduates receive the qualification “specialist”, as well as the officer rank of “lieutenant”.

Secondary and additional education

CHVVIURE provides the opportunity to receive military education in the following specialties:

• “Computer systems, complexes.”
• “Maintenance and repair of radio-electronic equipment.”

Cadets master science on a full-time basis for 2 years and 10 months. The diploma allows you to qualify as a “technician”; a military rank is not assigned.

The training system for cadets is structured in such a way that everyone receives additional education. Particular attention is paid to the study of foreign languages ​​and the practice of professional driving.

Areas of additional training:

• "Translator". While receiving education in their main specialization, cadets master one of the foreign languages. The languages ​​taught are Turkish, Chinese, English, Arabic, Persian, and German.
• "Vehicle Driver" Upon completion, licenses with open categories “B” and “C” are issued.

Material and technical base

The training of future military personnel involves in-depth study of the chosen specialization, which is impossible without mastering a large amount of theoretical knowledge and practical skills.

The educational process is implemented on a decent technical and material basis, namely:

• Military equipment. The cadets get to know modern types of weapons in practice using existing models.
• Laboratories are the basic units of the ChVVIURE, where students master the basics of constructing functional units of computer technology, radio equipment and electronic equipment. The premises are equipped with the necessary equipment, mock-ups, simulators, etc.
• Libraries. The book fund contains about 250 thousand units of literature. The list includes periodicals, reference books, textbooks, etc. The main fund is technical and scientific books. The school is working on writing and publishing methodological publications, textbooks for internal use, digitizing the existing printed stock of books, lectures, tests, etc. Today, a program is being implemented to reconstruct fiction books and educational literature.
• Training base (training, operational complexes, command posts for training purposes, training weapons, military equipment, etc.).
• Scientific and research work is provided with the necessary arsenal of tools, facilities and equipment for conducting targeted research.
• Workshops, warehouses, etc.

The educational process is carried out in lecture halls, rooms for group classes, laboratories, computer rooms and diploma design classes.

Many consider it lucky to enter the Cherepovets Higher Military Engineering School of Radio Electronics. Reviews talk about high requirements for candidates and excellent education. There are also indications that the level of education is decent, but admission is a little easier than in capital universities.

Leisure

Training is impossible without physical training and strengthening the moral and psychological state. Cadets annually take part in city-wide events, such as the children's and youth game "Zarnitsa", sports camps "Autumn", "Conscript Day", formation and military song competitions, events dedicated to the next anniversary of Victory in the War and other events celebrated by Cherepovets .

In order to improve the level of knowledge, the Higher Military Engineering School of Radio Electronics has entered into agreements with city museums, which makes it possible for cadets to visit expositions, exhibitions, cultural events and other events free of charge. CHVVIURE students often come to sponsored institutions - cadet and Suvorov schools, orphanages.

Sport

A considerable number of hours of training are devoted to sports training, which develops speed, agility, endurance and cultivates a healthy lifestyle. Cadets regularly engage in military sports as part of the educational process and schedule.

Sports sections add variety to hobbies:

• Power eventing and military all-around.
• Track and field athletics, hockey, football.
• Hand-to-hand combat, boxing, basketball, karate.
• Skiing, chess, volleyball, arm wrestling, etc.

The cadets undergo full military sports training, which is provided by the Cherepovets Higher Military Engineering School of Radio Electronics.

How to proceed

Admission is carried out on a competitive basis. Candidates for participation are persons who meet the following requirements:

• Male citizens of the Russian Federation who have not previously served in military service, at least 16 years of age and not older than 22 years of age.
• Military personnel or those who have previously completed military service are not older than 24 years.
• Retired or active contract military personnel (except for officers) under the age of 27 years.
• Individuals under the age of 30 who have a secondary school education are accepted for training in specialized secondary education programs.

Documents for admission:

• Statement.
• Birth certificate and document confirming citizenship, identity (copies).
• Autobiography, characteristics from the place of study, work, service.
• Document on previously obtained education, qualifications (copy).
• Three photos measuring 4.5 x 6 cm (certified).
• Cards of medical examination and psychological selection.
• Service card (for active military personnel).

The selection of candidates for training is carried out by the admissions committee according to the following criteria:

• Level of general education (USE).
• Socio-psychological state.
• General health status certified by a medical commission.
• Physical training.

The selection is carried out during the month of July (from the 1st to the 30th). Physical fitness is assessed based on the results of test physical exercises, which include:

• Pull-ups on the bar (minimum 4 times).
• Running, 100 meters (minimum value - 15.4 seconds).
• Cross, 3 km (minimum time - 14 min 50 sec).

The passing score for physical training is at least 120 units.

Military Institute (engineering and technical) of the Military Academy of Logistics and Technical Support named after Army General A. V. Khrulev (VI(IT)VAMTO named after. Khruleva)
Former names	Leningrad Higher Military Engineering and Construction School named after. General of the Army A. N. Komarovsky, VITU
Year of foundation
Closing year	2010, as an independent university
Reorganized	2010
Year of reorganization	2010
Type	military
Head of the Military Institute (engineering and technical)	Smolinsky Sergey Nikolaevich
The doctors	36
Location	Russia Russia; Saint Petersburg , Pushkin
Campus	urban
Legal address	St. Petersburg, 191123, st. Zakharyevskaya, 22; Tel.: (812) 578-82-02, 275-51-46, email address [email protected]
Website	University page    on the website of the Ministry of Defense

Military Institute (Engineering and Technical)(VIIT) in St. Petersburg is one of the oldest military higher educational institutions in Russia.

Encyclopedic YouTube

1 / 5

✪ Military Institute (engineering and technical) (formerly VITU)

✪ VITU.Military Institute of Engineering and Technology, (Military Academy of MTO).

✪ VITU - Military Institute (engineering and technical) VA MTO

✪ “Military Institute (engineering and technical) KSHVI 2018

✪ Graduation of officers from the Military Institute (engineering and technical)

Subtitles

Description

VIIT is located in the places of its historical foundation in the center of St. Petersburg on the banks of the Neva (including in the barracks of the Cavalry Regiment). In the immediate vicinity of the Engineering Castle, the Summer Garden, the A. V. Suvorov Museum (Suvorov, Alexander Vasilyevich), the architectural ensemble of the Smolny Monastery, the Tauride Palace and the park.

The traditions of the St. Petersburg Higher School of Military Engineers, the Main Engineering School, and the maintenance of the unique qualifications of the teaching staff are carefully preserved: now VIIT employs 43 doctors of science, professors, about 300 associate professors and candidates of science, among them: six honored scientists and technicians, two honored economists, one honored architect of Russia. The university has twelve specialized research laboratories and a unique scientific and experimental base, which in many ways has no analogues.

Story

Creation of an engineering higher educational institution in 1810

The Military Engineering and Technical University became the first higher engineering educational institution in Russia. As graduate S.P. Timoshenko writes in his book “Engineering Education in Russia”, the educational scheme of the Main Engineering School, born after the addition of senior officer classes, with the division of the Five-Year Education into two stages, later spread in Russia using the example of the Institute of Railway Engineers, and still remains today. This made it possible to start teaching mathematics, mechanics and physics at a high level already at the first stage and give students sufficient preparation in fundamental subjects, and then use the time to study engineering disciplines. Thus, Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky was able to study in 1838-1843, already using this higher education system.

The Academy was closed after the outbreak of the First World War in 1914, but was restored in November 1917 under the new name of the Military Engineering Academy. In 1923, after merging with the Electrical Engineering Academy, the Military Academy of Engineering Troops and Electrical Engineering was created. And in 1925, after merging with the Artillery Academy, the Leningrad Military-Technical Academy was created, which had an engineering faculty.

The administrative and structural leapfrog harmed stable development and certainly led to a weakening of the scientific and pedagogical forces, deeply St. Petersburg in essence and spirit of the highest military engineering school, received by the country from the Nikolaev Engineering Academy and School, but the scientific and pedagogical forces were completely restored before the start war, with the active participation of Nikolai Gerasimovich Kuznetsov, and largely thanks to the invaluable help. Thus, Nikolai Gerasimovich Kuznetsov actually preserved the St. Petersburg Higher Military Engineering Scientific and Pedagogical School for the country, after unfounded attempts in 1932-1939 to move and break away from its own historical soil necessary for development. Only Kuznetsov N.G., being in the position of People's Commissar, actually had the authority to counteract Stalin's policy directed against the St. Petersburg (Nikolaev) Higher Military Engineering School, which is now understandable only in the historical context of the Military Affairs and repressions of the 30s. But Stalin did not forgive Nikolai Gerasimovich for the “unauthorized” return of the Naval Engineering Faculty in 1939, as mentioned by the Court of Honor of the Military Department in 1948 (to correct the negative consequences of the arbitrary transfer of the Engineering Faculty to), as well as the restoration of the Nikolaev Higher Military Engineering Schools in St. Petersburg Military Engineering and Technical University.

The beginning of the legal existence of the Military Engineering and Technical University, as an independent higher military educational institution restored at its place of origin, belonging to and continuing the traditions of the St. Petersburg Higher School of Military Engineers, was laid in 1939 by the Institute of Industrial Construction Engineers, which was a separate part of the one founded in 1899, and returned Maritime Faculty of the Engineering Academy. The order of the People's Commissar of the Republic of Kazakhstan Navy Nikolai Gerasimovich Kuznetsov on the organization of VVMISU spoke of the need for the country to create a school on the basis of the separated part and the returned maritime faculty of the engineering academy, with the aim of training military engineers for the construction of naval bases and coastal fortifications, by restoring scientific and pedagogical forces of the St. Petersburg Higher School of Military Engineers, Nikolaev Engineering Academy and the Main Engineering School. The school was awarded the right of a higher technical educational institution. The duration of training was determined to be 5 years and 8 months. In its modern legal form, the university was established in 1997 after joining the Military Engineering and Construction Institute (VISI) of the Pushkin Higher Military Engineering Construction School (PVVISU).

Preservation and development of the traditions of the St. Petersburg Higher School of Military Engineers

The St. Petersburg Military Engineering and Technical University continues the more than 200-year preservation and development of the scientific and pedagogical traditions of the indigenous St. Petersburg engineering schools of Russia in its historical homeland.

The Military Engineering and Technical University is a direct historically legitimate successor of the traditions, at the same time, of the Higher School of Military Engineers St., which could be symbolized by Yuri Kondratyuk (Alexander Shargei), and due to the legal fact of maintaining continuity after the return of the faculty in 1939 with its location at the site of its founding , a direct heir to the traditions of the St. Petersburg Higher School of Military Engineers of the Main Military Engineering School, where Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky studied, marked by the return to the historical homeland of the naval engineering faculty of the academy (organized in 1932 in Moscow on the basis of the Civil Engineering School).

The university is a legally legitimate successor to the traditions of the St. Petersburg Higher School of Military Engineers, which could be symbolized by the 1883 graduate of the Nikolaev Engineering Academy Leonid Konstantinovich Artamonov, a Russian general, traveler and one of the representatives of the first legendary generation of Russian internationalist officers of the late nineteenth century who fought for freedom of Abyssinia (wrote: “Through Ethiopia to the shores of the White Nile”).

Since its formation, VITU has a unique composition of scientific and teaching staff, as a continuation of one of the historical traditions of the Main Engineering School and the Nikolaev Engineering Academy. Suffice it to say that in St. Petersburg, for the purpose of training military engineers, at different times they were involved: for teaching chemistry - D. I. Mendeleev, for teaching fortification - N. V. Boldyrev, mathematics - M. V. Ostrogradsky, communications - A. I. Kvist, and tactics, strategy and military history were taught by G. A. Leer. From the very beginning, the higher military educational institution always included world-famous scientists, for example, the founder of the national school of structural mechanics and elasticity theory B. G. Galerkin headed the department of structural mechanics, and the famous mathematician and economist, Nobel Prize laureate L. V. Kantorovich agreed to head Department of Mathematics, as well as the outstanding electrical engineer D. A. Zavalishin, the phenomenal military engineer - fortifier N. I. Ungerman, the unique heating engineer A. N. Lozhkin, and many other extraordinary engineers and scientists. An outstanding teacher was the professor and “father of the Russian cement industry” Shulyachenko, Alexey Romanovich. As a teacher, he was distinguished by his ability to eloquently and captivatingly present the subject of fortification, Quist, Alexander Ilyich.

One of the main traditions of the university is certainly the harmonious combination of patriotism and spiritual strength with the highest level of military engineering competence of graduates.

From the Great Patriotic War to the present day

The resilience and engineering training of graduates was proven during the Great Patriotic War. Fort Krasnaya Gorka, built according to the design of Professor K. I. Velichko, who taught at the university until his death in 1927, played a special role in the defense of Leningrad. The Military Engineering and Technical University actually participated in the war, producing military engineers for all fronts. In addition, the personnel directly took part in the defense of Leningrad. Teachers and cadets participated in the construction of defensive structures in the summer and autumn of 1941, provided patrol service, camouflaged buildings and structures, provided engineering support for the city’s defense, preparing for street battles. A significant part of the teaching staff took part in expert and design work for the front. The experts of the head of the engineering defense of Leningrad were headed by academician B. G. Galerkin. The group included professors B. D. Vasiliev, N. A. Kandyba, N. I. Ungerman, associate professors S. S. Golushkevich, P. I. Klubin. S. S. Golushkevich's scientific works on ice crossings provided the theoretical basis for the creation of the Road of Life on Lake Ladoga and communication with the country. Professor N.N. Luknitsky was engaged in scientific consultations for the production of prefabricated reinforced concrete firing points. Professor L.V. Kantorovich solved the problem of reducing risks and ensuring the safety of the Road of Life. The mechanical workshop of the laboratory of the Department of Strength of Materials produced small arms parts around the clock. A large number of graduates, commanders, teachers and cadets who participated in the war were awarded high government awards. For participation in the Great Patriotic War, by the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR dated February 22, 1944, VITU Navy was awarded the Order of the Red Banner, all personnel were awarded medals “For the Defense of Leningrad,” and the school cadets took part in the Victory Parade (June 24, 1945).

During the Soviet period of its existence, VITU trained more than 30 thousand engineers; Among the graduates there are 115 Honored Builders, as well as Guards Colonel (9GUMO is currently a priest of ELCI) Okolzin A.V., and more than 100 generals and admirals, including three Colonel Generals: Kotylev N.I., Shumilov L.V. . and Solomatin A.V.

Institute after 2000

During the reform to unite military universities, carried out on the initiative of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Serdyukov, VITU as an independent institution was liquidated. The university, together with four more military universities (the Institute of Railway Troops, Volsky, Omsk, Penza Military Institutes) was included in the Military Academy of Logistics named after Army General A.V. Khrulev as an institute (faculty), the number of departments was reduced to 11 .

Faculties

1. 1. Engineering and technical
2. 2. Energy (Electrical)
3. 3. Construction of naval bases
4. 4. Special faculty
5. 5. Faculty of retraining and advanced training

Civil Engineering faculties

Trains military engineers and civil engineers in the following specialties: “Construction and operation of buildings and structures for special and general military purposes”, “Construction, repair and technical operation of buildings and structures for special and general military purposes”, “Construction and operation of buildings and structures for special purposes” with the assignment qualification "civil engineer".

Faculty of Energy

Trains military engineers in the following specialties: “Installation, operation and repair of power supply systems and electrical equipment of buildings and structures for special and general military purposes” with the qualification “electrical engineer”, “Installation, operation and repair of thermal power equipment of buildings and structures for special and general military purposes” with assignment of the qualification “thermal power engineer”, “Installation, operation and repair of electromechanical installations of coastal fleet facilities” with assignment of the qualification “energy engineer”.

Faculty of Naval Base Construction

Trains military engineers in the following specialties: “Construction and operation of hydraulic structures and special facilities of naval bases, ensuring the basing of fleet forces” with the qualification “civil engineer” for service in engineering, research, and leadership positions in the Navy Russian Federation.

Special Faculty

It trains foreign specialists from both near and far abroad.

Departments (until 2010)

1 Pedagogy, psychology and national history 2 Humanitarian and socio-economic disciplines 3 Tactics and general military disciplines 4 Mathematics 5 Physics 6 Physical training and sports 7 Foreign languages ​​11 Construction machines (automotive and lifting equipment, operation and repair) 12 Construction materials 13 Military and industrial buildings 21 Power supply 22 Electrical equipment and automation 23 Engines (and power plants)

24 Thermal power plants 31 Reliability, installation and operation of military infrastructure 32 Ecology and sanitary systems 33 Fire safety 41 Military architecture 42 Naval bases, airfields and roads 43 Building structures (and solid mechanics) 44 Computer technology (automated design systems and management of construction production) 51 Engineering geodesy, bases and foundations 52 Fortifications (and protective structures) 53 Construction technologies 54 Organization of production (and economics of construction) 55 Camouflage

Specialties of training

Training is conducted in three specialties (specialty, 5 years) of higher education and in one specialty of secondary vocational education:

1. 140107 Heat and electricity supply for special technical systems and facilities
2. 271101 Construction of unique buildings and structures
3. 080225 Logistics support (specializations - Organization of municipal services and construction, Organization of operation, repair and installation of sanitary systems)
4. 280104 Fire safety, technician

The admission rules establish additional requirements for applicants. In addition to the traditional Unified State Exam for civilian universities in three subjects (Russian language, mathematics, physics or social studies), it is necessary to pass standards (exams) for pull-ups, 100 m and 3 km running. Points for exercises are added to points for tests on the Unified State Examination.

Notable teachers and alumni

Notable graduates and teachers of the St. Petersburg Higher School of Military Engineers of the Military Engineering and Technical University:

• Arens, Apollon Ivanovich, military engineer, major general, full-time teacher at the Nikolaev Engineering Academy
• Artamonov, Leonid Konstantinovich, Russian general, traveler and one of the representatives of the first legendary generation of Russian internationalist officers of the late nineteenth century who fought for the freedom of Abyssinia (wrote: “Through Ethiopia to the shores of the White Nile”)
• Abramov, Fedor Fedorovich - lieutenant general, in exile assistant to the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Army, head of all units and departments of the Russian Army
• Brianchaninov, Dmitry Alexandrovich - Bishop of the Caucasus and Stavropol Ignatius (Brianchaninov) - theologian, canonized.
• Buinitsky, Nestor Aloizievich - Lieutenant General
• Bulmering, Evgeniy Mikhailovich (1834-1897) - Kerch commandant, hero of the Russian-Turkish war of 1877-1878.
• Bunin, Mikhail Aleksandrovich - Lieutenant General, Deputy Commander of the Leningrad Military District for the construction and quartering of troops.
• Burman, Georgy Vladimirovich - Major General, creator of the air defense of Petrograd, head of the Officer Electrical Engineering School
• Wegener, Alexander Nikolaevich - Russian military aeronaut, military pilot and engineer, aircraft designer, head of the Main Aerodrome, first head of the VVIA named after. 
• N. E. Zhukovsky.
• Velichko, Konstantin Ivanovich (-, Leningrad) - Russian military engineer, professor of fortification, voluntarily joined the Red Army, author of numerous fortification projects, including the Krasnaya Gorka fort system
• Voinitsky, Heinrich Stanislavovich, military engineer, architect and professor, specialist in ventilation and heating
• Galerkin, Boris Grigorievich (February 20 (1871-1945) - Russian and Soviet engineer, scientist in the field of elasticity theory and mathematician, academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences (with, corresponding member with), engineer-lieutenant general
• Gershelman, Vladimir Konstantinovich - head of the mobilization department of the headquarters of the UVO
• Golovin, Kharlampiy Sergeevich - director
• Grigorovich, Dmitry Vasilievich - writer
• Dostoevsky, Fyodor Mikhailovich - writer
• Dutov, Alexander Ilyich - Lieutenant General, Ataman of the Orenburg Cossack Army
• Kantorovich, Leonid Vitalievich (1912-1986) - Soviet mathematician and economist, winner of the 1975 Nobel Prize in Economics “for his contribution to the theory of optimal resource allocation.” Pioneer and one of the creators of linear programming.
• Kapitsa, Leonid Petrovich (1864-1919), father of Peter Leonidovich Kapitsa - Major General of the Engineering Corps, built the Kronstadt forts
• Karbyshev, Dmitry Mikhailovich - Lieutenant General of the Engineering Troops, Hero of the Soviet Union
• Kaufman, Konstantin Petrovich - engineer-general, adjutant general, Turkestan governor-general
• Kaufman, Mikhail Petrovich - Lieutenant General, Adjutant General, Member of the State Council
• Kondratenko, Roman Isidorovich - lieutenant general, hero of the defense of Port Arthur
• Korguzalov, Vladimir Leonidovich - guard major, head of the engineering service of the 3rd Guards Mechanized Corps of the 47th Army of the Voronezh Front, Hero of the Soviet Union
• Kraevich, Konstantin Dmitrievich - Russian physicist, mathematician and teacher
• Krivov, Valentin Gavrilovich - scientist in the field of diesel and combined power plants and autonomous power supply stations.
• Krivoshein, Grigory Grigorievich (1868-1940) - major general (since 1912), bridge builder.
• Cui, Caesar Antonovich - composer and music critic, professor of fortification, engineer general
• Laskovsky, Fyodor Pavlovich (1843-1905) - lieutenant general (from 1896), participant in the Russian-Turkish War of 1877-1878. .
• Leman, Anatoly Ivanovich - Russian writer, violin maker

(I) K: Educational institutions founded in 1932

Military Institute (engineer troops) of the Combined Arms Academy of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation- a structural unit of the OVA of the Russian Armed Forces. During Soviet times Military Engineering Order of Lenin, Red Banner Academy named after V.V. Kuibyshev. Currently, it is the main training and methodological center for the engineering troops of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

Story

Engineering Academy in St. Petersburg

Both the Military Engineering and Technical University in St. Petersburg and the Military Institute of Engineering Troops in Moscow (formerly the Kuibyshev Academy) are claiming succession to the Nikolaev Engineering Academy. Petersburgers refer to the fact that on June 10, 1939, a decree of the Defense Committee of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR was signed, and an order was issued by the People's Commissar of the Navy on the formation in Leningrad of the Higher Naval Civil Engineering School of the RKKVMF, where the naval engineering faculty of the academy was returned and a separate part was attached - Leningrad Institute of Industrial Construction Engineers.

Academy named after Kuibyshev

The Military Engineering Academy was created by order of the Revolutionary Military Council of the USSR dated March 21, 1932, on the basis of the academy's engineering faculty, which moved to Moscow, and using the base of the Higher Civil Engineering School. Three years later, the academy was named after V.V. Kuibyshev.

The academy occupied the old house of the Durasovs on Pokrovsky Boulevard. In 1932, a new building was built for the Military Engineering Academy on the site of the right wing of the estate on the corner of Vorontsovo Pole Street (architect A. Kruglov). From November 1941 to December 1943, the academy was evacuated to the city of Frunze.

For many years the chairman of the state commission for the defense of diploma projects Military Engineering Academy named after V.V. Kuibyshev was a graduate of the Nikolaev School D.M. Karbyshev. Prominent scientists taught at the academy: Hero of Socialist Labor I. M. Rabinovich, professors M. M. Filonenko-Borodich, V. K. Dmokhovsky, V. M. Keldysh, A. F. Loleit.

After joining the Combined Arms Academy of the Russian Armed Forces Military Institute (engineering troops) remained the main training and methodological center of the engineering troops. It trains officers for the Armed Forces, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Border Service of the FSB, as well as for a number of foreign armies.

IN institute There are faculties: command engineering, command of the Internal Troops, command of the Border Service, geodetic, retraining and advanced training, civil defense. There is a correspondence education department. There are 17 departments, including tactics of engineering troops, control of engineering troops, fortification and camouflage, engineering barriers, road vehicles and crossings, etc.

IN institute There is a research center, the main areas of research of which are combat engineering, tactics of engineering troops, fortification equipment of the area, the use and overcoming of obstacles, the preparation and maintenance of troop movement routes and crossings, camouflage of troops, etc.

Since 1998, in accordance with the resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation Military Engineering Academy named after V.V. Kuibyshev(Moscow) transformed into Military Engineering University with three branches: St. Petersburg, Nizhny Novgorod and Tyumen.

Chief institute was appointed deputy head of the Combined Arms Academy of the Russian Armed Forces, Major General (2004, since 2008, Lieutenant General) Yu. P. Balkhovitin (born in 1958), since August 1, 2008 - head of the engineering troops of the Ground Forces. Dismissed from military service on November 24, 2009 due to a major fire at the 31st Arsenal of the Russian Defense Ministry in Ulyanovsk on November 13, 2009.

Famous teachers

• D. M. Karbyshev, Hero of the Soviet Union
• I. M. Rabinovich, Hero of Socialist Labor
• M. M. Filonenko-Borodich, professor, Honored Worker of Science and Technology of the RSFSR
• V. K. Dmokhovsky, professor
• V. M. Keldysh, professor
• G. G. Carlsen, professor
• A. F. Loleit, professor
• A. A. Zubkov, senior lecturer
• A. S. Fisenko, professor, head of the department of industrial structures
• B. F. Zarako-Zarakovsky, Soviet and Polish military leader, lieutenant general of the Soviet Army and division general of the Polish Army

Graduates

Prominent military leaders of the engineering troops were students of the St. Petersburg and Moscow academies:

• Chief of the Red Army Engineering Troops in 1941-1942, Major General of the Engineering Troops L.Z. Kotlyar;
• Chief of the Red Army Engineering Troops since 1942, First Marshal of the Engineering Troops M.P. Vorobyov;
• Head of the Engineering Department of the People's Commissariat of the Navy during the war, Lieutenant General of the Engineering Troops P. I. Sudbin;
• Chief of Staff of the Engineering Troops of the Soviet Army B.V. Blagoslavov
• Chief of Staff of the Red Army Engineering Troops, Colonel General of the Engineering Troops K. S. Nazarov;
• Marshal of the Soviet Union N.V. Ogarkov.

The heads of the engineering troops of the fronts during the war were graduates of the academy N.P. Baranov, B.V. Blagoslavov, Yu. V. Bordzilovsky, B. V. Bychevsky, I. P. Galitsky, V. F. Zotov, N. F. Kirchevsky, Z. I. Kolesnikov, V. V. Kosarev, G. G. Nevsky, I. A. Petrov, N. M. Pilipets, A. I. Proshlyakov, A. I. Smirnov-Nesvitsky, A. F. Khrenov, A. D. Tsirlin, V. F. Shestakov.

Among the graduates of the academy are outstanding military engineers and scientists E.V. Alexandrov, G.G. Azgaldov, M.G. Barkhin, S.A. Ilyasevich, N.S. Kasperovich, N.L. Kirpichev, A.R. Shulyachenko , G. M. Salamakhin, B. G. Skramtaev, Art. teacher V.M. Zaitsev (candidate of technical sciences) and others.

Write a review of the article "Military Institute (Engineering Troops) of the Combined Arms Academy of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation"

Notes

Literature

• Under the general editorship of A. D. Tsirlin, Red Banner Military Engineering Academy named after V. V. Kuibyshev, Brief historical sketch. - Moscow (M.), VIA, 1966.
• Military Engineering Academy named after. Kuibyshev 150 years old, M.: Voenizdat, 1969.
• 150 years of the Military Engineering Order of Lenin Red Banner Academy named after V.V. Kuibyshev., M., Factory named after. Dunaeva, 1969.
• Tsirlin A.D., Biryukov P.I., Istomin V.P., Fedoseev E.N. Engineering troops in the battles for the Soviet Motherland. - M.: Military Publishing House, 1970.
• Shevchuk A. B. et al. Military Engineering University is 180 years old. - M.: VIU, 1999.
• Military encyclopedic dictionary of engineering troops. - M.: VIA, 2004.
• Zelensky V. E. Monuments of military engineering art: historical memory of modern society and new objects of cultural heritage of Russia

Links

An excerpt characterizing the Military Institute (engineering troops) of the Combined Arms Academy of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation

The totality of causes of phenomena is inaccessible to the human mind. But the need to find reasons is embedded in the human soul. And the human mind, without delving into the innumerability and complexity of the conditions of phenomena, each of which separately can be represented as a cause, grabs the first, most understandable convergence and says: this is the cause. In historical events (where the object of observation is the actions of people), the most primitive convergence seems to be the will of the gods, then the will of those people who stand in the most prominent historical place - historical heroes. But one has only to delve into the essence of each historical event, that is, into the activities of the entire mass of people who participated in the event, to be convinced that the will of the historical hero not only does not guide the actions of the masses, but is itself constantly guided. It would seem that it is all the same to understand the significance of the historical event one way or another. But between the man who says that the peoples of the West went to the East because Napoleon wanted it, and the man who says that it happened because it had to happen, there is the same difference that existed between the people who argued that the earth stands firmly and the planets move around it, and those who said that they do not know what the earth rests on, but they know that there are laws governing the movement of it and other planets. There are no and cannot be reasons for a historical event, except for the only cause of all reasons. But there are laws that govern events, partly unknown, partly groped by us. The discovery of these laws is possible only when we completely renounce the search for causes in the will of one person, just as the discovery of the laws of planetary motion became possible only when people renounced the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe affirmation of the earth.

After the Battle of Borodino, the enemy’s occupation of Moscow and its burning, historians recognize the most important episode of the War of 1812 as the movement of the Russian army from the Ryazan to the Kaluga road and to the Tarutino camp - the so-called flank march behind Krasnaya Pakhra. Historians attribute the glory of this ingenious feat to various individuals and argue about who, in fact, it belongs to. Even foreign, even French historians recognize the genius of the Russian commanders when speaking about this flank march. But why military writers, and everyone after them, believe that this flank march is a very thoughtful invention of some one person, which saved Russia and destroyed Napoleon, is very difficult to understand. In the first place, it is difficult to understand wherein lies the profundity and genius of this movement; for in order to guess that the best position of the army (when it is not attacked) is where there is more food, it does not require much mental effort. And everyone, even a stupid thirteen-year-old boy, could easily guess that in 1812 the most advantageous position of the army, after the retreat from Moscow, was on the Kaluga road. So, it is impossible to understand, firstly, by what conclusions historians reach the point of seeing something profound in this maneuver. Secondly, it is even more difficult to understand exactly what historians see as the salvation of this maneuver for the Russians and its detrimental nature for the French; for this flank march, under other preceding, accompanying and subsequent circumstances, could have been disastrous for the Russians and salutary for the French army. If from the time this movement took place, the position of the Russian army began to improve, then it does not follow from this that this movement was the reason for this.
This flank march not only could not have brought any benefits, but could have destroyed the Russian army if other conditions had not coincided. What would have happened if Moscow had not burned down? If Murat had not lost sight of the Russians? If Napoleon had not been inactive? What if the Russian army, on the advice of Bennigsen and Barclay, had given battle at Krasnaya Pakhra? What would have happened if the French had attacked the Russians when they were going after Pakhra? What would have happened if Napoleon had subsequently approached Tarutin and attacked the Russians with at least one tenth of the energy with which he attacked in Smolensk? What would have happened if the French had marched on St. Petersburg?.. With all these assumptions, the salvation of a flank march could turn into destruction.
Thirdly, and the most incomprehensible, is that people who study history deliberately do not want to see that the flank march cannot be attributed to any one person, that no one ever foresaw it, that this maneuver, just like the retreat in Filyakh, in the present, was never presented to anyone in its entirety, but step by step, event by event, moment by moment, flowed from a countless number of very diverse conditions, and only then was presented in all its entirety, when it was completed and became the past.
At the council in Fili, the dominant thought among the Russian authorities was a self-evident retreat in a direct direction back, that is, along the Nizhny Novgorod road. Evidence of this is that the majority of votes at the council were cast in this sense, and, most importantly, the well-known conversation after the council of the commander-in-chief with Lansky, who was in charge of the provisions department. Lanskoy reported to the commander-in-chief that food for the army was collected mainly along the Oka, in the Tula and Kaluga provinces, and that in the event of a retreat to Nizhny, food supplies would be separated from the army by the large Oka River, through which transportation in the first winter was impossible. This was the first sign of the need to deviate from what had previously seemed the most natural direct direction to Nizhny. The army stayed further south, along the Ryazan road, and closer to the reserves. Subsequently, the inaction of the French, who even lost sight of the Russian army, concerns about protecting the Tula plant and, most importantly, the benefits of getting closer to their reserves, forced the army to deviate even further south, onto the Tula road. Having crossed in a desperate movement beyond Pakhra to the Tula road, the military leaders of the Russian army thought to remain near Podolsk, and there was no thought about the Tarutino position; but countless circumstances and the appearance again of French troops, who had previously lost sight of the Russians, and battle plans, and, most importantly, the abundance of provisions in Kaluga, forced our army to deviate even more to the south and move to the middle of the routes for its food supply, from the Tula to the Kaluga road, to Tarutin. Just as it is impossible to answer the question of when Moscow was abandoned, it is also impossible to answer when exactly and by whom it was decided to go to Tarutin. Only when the troops had already arrived at Tarutin as a result of countless differential forces, then people began to assure themselves that they had wanted this and had long foreseen it.

The famous flank march consisted only in the fact that the Russian army, retreating straight back in the opposite direction of advance, after the French offensive had ceased, deviated from the direct direction initially adopted and, not seeing pursuit behind itself, naturally moved in the direction where it attracted by an abundance of food.
If we were to imagine not brilliant commanders at the head of the Russian army, but simply one army without leaders, then this army could not do anything other than move back to Moscow, describing an arc from the side on which there was more food and the edge was more abundantly.
This movement from the Nizhny Novgorod to the Ryazan, Tula and Kaluga roads was so natural that the marauders of the Russian army ran away in this very direction and that in this very direction it was required from St. Petersburg that Kutuzov move his army. In Tarutino, Kutuzov almost received a reprimand from the sovereign for withdrawing the army to the Ryazan road, and he was pointed out the same situation against Kaluga in which he was already at the time he received the sovereign’s letter.
Rolling back in the direction of the push given to it during the entire campaign and in the Battle of Borodino, the ball of the Russian army, having destroyed the force of the push and not receiving new shocks, took the position that was natural to it.
Kutuzov's merit did not lie in some brilliant, as they call it, strategic maneuver, but in the fact that he alone understood the significance of the event that was taking place. He alone understood even then the meaning of the inaction of the French army, he alone continued to assert that the Battle of Borodino was a victory; he alone - the one who, it would seem, due to his position as commander-in-chief, should have been called to the offensive - he alone used all his strength to keep the Russian army from useless battles.
The killed animal near Borodino lay somewhere where the hunter who ran away had left it; but whether he was alive, whether he was strong, or whether he was just hiding, the hunter did not know. Suddenly the groan of this beast was heard.
The groan of this wounded beast, the French army, which exposed its destruction, was the sending of Lauriston to Kutuzov’s camp with a request for peace.
Napoleon, with his confidence that it is not only good that is good, but what came into his head that is good, wrote to Kutuzov the words that first came to his mind and had no meaning. He wrote:

“Monsieur le prince Koutouzov,” he wrote, “j"envoie pres de vous un de mes aides de camps generaux pour vous entretenir de plusieurs objets interessants. Je desire que Votre Altesse ajoute foi a ce qu"il lui dira, surtout lorsqu" il exprimera les sentiments d"estime et de particuliere consideration que j"ai depuis longtemps pour sa personne... Cette lettre n"etant a autre fin, je prie Dieu, Monsieur le prince Koutouzov, qu"il vous ait en sa sainte et digne garde ,
Moscou, le 3 Octobre, 1812. Signe:
Napoleon."
[Prince Kutuzov, I am sending you one of my general adjutants to negotiate with you on many important subjects. I ask Your Lordship to believe everything that he tells you, especially when he begins to express to you the feelings of respect and special reverence that I have had for you for a long time. Therefore, I pray to God to keep you under his sacred roof.
Moscow, October 3, 1812.
Napoleon. ]

“Je serais maudit par la posterite si l"on me regardait comme le premier moteur d"un accommodation quelconque. Tel est l "esprit actuel de ma nation", [I would be damned if they looked at me as the first instigator of any deal; such is the will of our people.] - answered Kutuzov and continued to use all his strength for that to keep troops from advancing.
In the month of the robbery of the French army in Moscow and the quiet stop of the Russian army near Tarutin, a change occurred in the strength of both troops (spirit and number), as a result of which the advantage of strength was on the side of the Russians. Despite the fact that the position of the French army and its strength were unknown to the Russians, how soon the attitude changed, the need for an offensive was immediately expressed in countless signs. These signs were: the sending of Lauriston, and the abundance of provisions in Tarutino, and information coming from all sides about the inaction and disorder of the French, and the recruitment of our regiments with recruits, and good weather, and the long rest of Russian soldiers, and the rest that usually arises in the troops as a result of rest. impatience to carry out the task for which everyone was gathered, and curiosity about what was happening in the French army, so long lost from sight, and the courage with which Russian outposts were now snooping around the French stationed in Tarutino, and news of easy victories over the French by the peasants and the partisans, and the envy aroused by this, and the feeling of revenge that lay in the soul of every person as long as the French were in Moscow, and (most importantly) the unclear, but arose in the soul of every soldier, consciousness that the relationship of force had now changed and the advantage is on our side. The essential balance of forces changed, and an offensive became necessary. And immediately, just as surely as the chimes begin to strike and play in a clock, when the hand has made a full circle, in the higher spheres, in accordance with a significant change in forces, the increased movement, hissing and play of the chimes was reflected.

The Russian army was controlled by Kutuzov with his headquarters and the sovereign from St. Petersburg. In St. Petersburg, even before receiving news of the abandonment of Moscow, a detailed plan for the entire war was drawn up and sent to Kutuzov for guidance. Despite the fact that this plan was drawn up on the assumption that Moscow was still in our hands, this plan was approved by headquarters and accepted for execution. Kutuzov only wrote that long-range sabotage is always difficult to carry out. And to resolve the difficulties encountered, new instructions and persons were sent who were supposed to monitor his actions and report on them.
In addition, now the entire headquarters in the Russian army has been transformed. The places of the murdered Bagration and the offended, retired Barclay were replaced. They thought very seriously about what would be better: to place A. in B.’s place, and B. in D.’s place, or, on the contrary, D. in A.’s place, etc., as if anything other than the pleasure of A. and B., it could depend on this.
At the army headquarters, on the occasion of Kutuzov’s hostility with his chief of staff, Bennigsen, and the presence of the sovereign’s trusted representatives and these movements, a more than usual complex game of parties was going on: A. undermined B., D. under S., etc. ., in all possible movements and combinations. With all these undermining, the subject of intrigue was mostly the military matter that all these people thought to lead; but this military matter went on independently of them, exactly as it should have gone, that is, never coinciding with what people came up with, but flowing from the essence of the attitude of the masses. All these inventions, crossing and intertwining, represented in the higher spheres only a true reflection of what was about to happen.
“Prince Mikhail Ilarionovich! – the sovereign wrote on October 2 in a letter received after the Battle of Tarutino. – Since September 2, Moscow has been in enemy hands. Your last reports are from the 20th; and during this entire time, not only has nothing been done to act against the enemy and liberate the capital, but even, according to your latest reports, you have retreated back. Serpukhov is already occupied by an enemy detachment, and Tula, with its famous and so necessary for the army factory, is in danger. From reports from General Wintzingerode, I see that the enemy 10,000th Corps is moving along the St. Petersburg road. Another, in several thousand, is also being submitted to Dmitrov. The third moved forward along the Vladimir road. The fourth, quite significant, stands between Ruza and Mozhaisk. Napoleon himself was in Moscow on the 25th. According to all this information, when the enemy fragmented his forces with strong detachments, when Napoleon himself was still in Moscow, with his guards, is it possible that the enemy forces in front of you were significant and did not allow you to act offensively? With probability, on the contrary, it must be assumed that he is pursuing you with detachments, or at least a corps, much weaker than the army entrusted to you. It seemed that, taking advantage of these circumstances, you could profitably attack an enemy weaker than you and destroy him or, at least, forcing him to retreat, retain in our hands a noble part of the provinces now occupied by the enemy, and thereby avert the danger from Tula and our other internal cities. It will remain your responsibility if the enemy is able to send a significant corps to St. Petersburg to threaten this capital, in which there could not be many troops left, for with the army entrusted to you, acting with determination and activity, you have all the means to avert this new misfortune. Remember that you still owe a response to the offended fatherland for the loss of Moscow. You have experienced my willingness to reward you. This readiness will not weaken in me, but I and Russia have the right to expect on your part all the zeal, firmness and success that your intelligence, your military talents and the courage of the troops led by you foretell to us.”

• 09.00.00 Informatics and Computer Science
• 09.05.01 Application and operation of automated systems for special purposes
• 11.00.00 Electronics, radio engineering and communication systems
• 11.05.01 Radio-electronic systems and complexes
• 26.00.00 Equipment and technologies of shipbuilding and water transport
• 26.05.03 Construction, repair and search and rescue support of surface ships and submarines
• 26.05.04 Application and operation of technical systems of surface ships and submarines
• 25.05.06 Operation of ship power plants
• 26.05.07 Operation of ship electrical equipment and automation equipment
• 56.00.00 Military Administration
• 56.05.02 Radiation, chemical and biological protection

Military education throughout the world is associated with engineering professions. To ensure the work of state security, highly qualified technical personnel with excellent knowledge and stable psyche are required, which is given great attention when selecting candidates for military service.

Military education in Russia has its own specifics. Student cadets receive two educations at once: a civil engineering specialty (if they study in the department of higher education) or a technician specialty (if they study in the department of secondary vocational education) and a military education.

The list of military specialties for which enrollment is made for training in each specific year is communicated to applicants upon their arrival at military institutes. Military universities, unlike civilian ones, did not switch to a two-level type of education, but retained the specialty - 5 years of study.

Those who graduate from the institute with specialties of higher education are issued a diploma of higher education of the established standard in a civilian specialty with the appropriate qualification of “engineer” and the military rank of “lieutenant”.

Those wishing to enroll in a military university submit applications to the department of the military commissariat of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation at their place of residence, and graduates of Suvorov (cadet) military schools, lyceums with enhanced military physical training must submit an application addressed to the head of the military school (lyceum) in which they are studying , until April 1.

Citizens serving and living in military units stationed outside the Russian Federation submit applications to the head of the university before May 20.

After submitting the application, a preliminary selection is carried out based on documents in order to determine the suitability of candidates for studying at a university based on the presence of Russian citizenship; by level of education; according to the age; for health; by level of physical fitness; according to the category of professional suitability in order to send candidates who meet the formal requirements to entrance examinations to institutes.

Admission to military institutes of the Ministry of Defense is carried out on a competitive basis, and the most capable and prepared children for mastering educational programs are enrolled in training.

Along with the competition of documents, as in civilian universities, student cadets undergo professional selection: a set of measures to select candidates for training who meet the requirements established by the legislation of the Russian Federation and the Procedure, as well as to determine their ability to master professional educational programs at the appropriate level.

Requirements for candidates for enrollment in military universities:

Citizens of the Russian Federation who meet the requirements established for those entering military service under a contract and who have a general secondary education are considered as candidates for enrollment as cadets in military institutes for higher education programs:
• citizens aged 16 to 22 years who have not served in the military;
• citizens who have completed military service and military personnel undergoing military service upon conscription, until they reach the age of 24 years;
• military personnel undergoing military service under a contract (except for officers) entering training under programs with full military-special training, until they reach the age of 27 years.

Citizens with secondary general education until they reach the age of 30 are considered as candidates for admission to cadet training in programs with secondary military special training.

Restrictions for applicants to military universities:
• citizens who already have higher education;
• citizens who do not meet the requirements for entering military service under a contract;
• persons in respect of whom a decision was made by the commission of a military commissariat or the certification commission of a military unit on the inadequacy of the candidate;
• persons against whom a guilty verdict has been passed and to whom punishment has been imposed;
• persons deprived by a court decision of the right to hold military positions for a certain period.

It's no secret that innovations and technical improvements come first to the military industry, and military equipment and equipment will always be half a step ahead of civilian ones.

If a young person wants to get acquainted with the engineering of the future today, receive the most modern engineering education and immediately see its application in practice, pay close attention to military universities.

Despite all the reforms, benefits for military personnel remained: early pensions, state support, guaranteed career growth and other preferences.

In Russia there are enormous opportunities to realize your abilities, apply your knowledge and be useful to society.

Where to study

Educational institutions of the Ministry of Defense
• Military Academy of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Moscow
• Military Educational and Scientific Center of the Ground Forces "Combined Arms Academy of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation", Moscow
• Air Force Military Training and Research Center “Air Force Academy named after. Professor N.E. Zhukovsky and Yu.A. Gagarin", Voronezh
• Military training and scientific center of the Navy “Naval Academy named after. Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union N.G. Kuznetsova", St. Petersburg
• Military Academy of Logistics named after. Army General A.V. Khruleva, St. Petersburg
• Military Space Academy named after. A.F. Mozhaisky, St. Petersburg
• Mikhailovskaya Military Artillery Academy, St. Petersburg
• Military Academy of Communications named after. Marshal of the Soviet Union S.M. Budyonny, St. Petersburg
• Military Academy of Strategic Missile Forces named after. Peter the Great, Balashikha, Moscow region.
• Yaroslavl Higher Military School of Air Defense, Yaroslavl
• Military Academy of Military Air Defense of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation named after. Marshal of the Soviet Union A.M. Vasilevsky, Smolensk
• Military Academy of Aerospace Defense named after. Marshal of the Soviet Union G.K. Zhukova, Tver
• Krasnodar Higher Military School named after Army General S.M. Shtemenko, Krasnodar
• Krasnodar Higher Military Aviation School named after Hero of the Soviet Union A.K. Serova, Krasnodar
• Military Academy of Radiation, Chemical and Biological Defense named after. Marshal of the Soviet Union S.K. Timoshenko, Kostroma
• Far Eastern Higher Combined Arms Command School named after Marshal of the Soviet Union K.K. Rokossovsky, Blagoveshchensk, Amur region.
• Novosibirsk Higher Military Command School, Novosibirsk
• Pacific Higher Naval School named after. S.O. Makarova, Vladivostok
• Ryazan Higher Airborne Command School named after Army General V.F. Margelova, Ryazan
• Black Sea Higher Naval Order of the Red Star School named after P.S. Nakhimov, Sevastopol
• Tyumen Higher Military Engineering Command School named after Marshal A.I. Proshlyakova, Tyumen
• Cherepovets Higher Military Engineering School of Radio Electronics, Cherepovets
• Military University of the Ministry of Defense, Moscow
• Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov, St. Petersburg
• Military Institute of Physical Culture, St. Petersburg