When I left the Russian State University for the Humanities two years ago, I did not write anything about my motives; several fellow students I liked asked me about it. Due to social reasons, they are more dependent people and wanted to avoid unnecessary struggle. Nasty, of course, but understandable. Then I didn’t bother to ruin their life again and left silently, especially since in England I quickly began to forget about my alma noverca.

I would like to believe that they also forgot about me. So there will be no harm if I finally remember everything, fortunately an informational occasion has turned up: the church is taking away part of the building on Nikolskaya Street from the Russian State University for the Humanities.

I will not describe the conflict itself for a long time, everything is more or less clear: the clergy are trying to restitute pre-revolutionary property by force. This is a long-standing and sluggishly ongoing story that was discussed back when I was a student. True, the circus with the Cossacks did not come then, no luck. But that's an aside.

My gaze was first of all drawn to the familiar details of the organization of faculty life.

The uninvited guests passed the guards without any problems, saying that “a few professional blows would make them very ill.”

I remember once on Airborne Forces Day, drunken soldiers walked into the university building with the same ease. The guards, naturally, pretended that nothing was happening and, as if nothing had happened, right in front of these airborne troops, they continued to harass the incoming students with special care.

Or there was another case, a woman about 60 years old came from some Nizhny Tagil, she really wanted to look at the place where she once studied. They had fun on it. I don’t know how it all ended, but in front of my eyes she was bullied for about thirty minutes. Several students tried to vouch for her, but the guards were at an impregnable post. They are generally impregnable, especially if you come without a student's ID. In such cases, inaccessibility enters its most inaccessible phase, even if they even know you by sight. If they know, even better.

I understand that security guards are a special subspecies of people, but at FIPP they are clearly integrated into the general hierarchy. Here I really don’t want to get personal, so I, with one exception, will refrain from personalization as much as possible. I will only note that the IAI is the most unhealthy environment where I had to spend any length of time. Over the past two years, I have only been subjected to the kind of disrespect that students are regularly shown at FIPP at the passport office.

The dean's secretary is a real fuck-up. A Georgian who repeatedly fought with students, and at least once with a female laboratory assistant. Completely inadequate and in his own mind, with students and most teachers he speaks exclusively in the language of market abuse. I don’t know for what merit they stubbornly keep him in place, and it’s none of my business. But this person is almost single-handedly responsible for most of the negativity in the IAI.

Other problems are more prosaic in nature. There is a serious staff shortage at FIPP, so everyone is doing everything. Those who still understand something take related professions: sociologists teach political disciplines, historians teach PR. Nobody teaches law. That's how it was at least two years ago. The only bright spot in the entire educational process were the graduate students who were still trying to somehow join the discourse and maintain contact with reality.

One of the loudest scandals arose over the building on Nikolskaya Street, 15, building 1, in which the Kruzhka beer bar operates.

Oh, I remember this scandal, I remember how the sign appeared, obscuring everything. But before the Mug was opened there, the place didn’t disappear either. Directly at the entrance there was a shawarma, whose aroma unforgettably filled the university lobby. But the smell is okay, everyone sniffed it. And with the advent of the Mug, a new exciting element was added to the landscape - gopota. It's a football bar, they spin the ball. Fine.

Another interesting aspect of faculty life is the dining room. She's gone. No, it seems like six years ago, it wasn’t even before I arrived. There have been rumors for a long time that they are about to open it. Then, apparently, everyone got tired of it, and the faculty decided to simply cancel lunch. You read that right, there is no lunch break at FIPP. But there are days filled with couples from 9 to 7. I would, of course, skip. But the fact itself, you see, is interesting.

The only thing FIP is really good with is words. I attended the dean’s address to the faculty twice and couldn’t be surprised at how many good things were happening. It’s a pity there is no shorthand online, otherwise I would have quoted it. High style.

But addresses are generally a special genre, where when it’s the department head’s turn to speak, sometimes you hear enough of such things that you want to take a shower. And it’s all clear, little people, they want to be liked. But all the same, when adults in front of you selflessly perform metaphysical fellatio, through the second person they call the dean God and sincerely thank him “for everything,” it becomes somehow awkward. For yourself, for them, and in general for the world around you.

However, students at FIP ​​don’t care much about all this. The students, for the most part, are very happy with everything. This is probably the most offensive thing: people aged 18-20 are not only burned with opportunism, they are already actively looking for somewhere better to grovel. A university diploma is like a civilian shoulder strap that must be earned.

It is clear that all this has the same relation to acquiring knowledge as sweeping with a crowbar has to cleaning. Therefore, for most, it makes no difference that there are no teachers and classes are canceled three times a week, every week. I remember going for a month only to find out on the spot that there were no pairs, but next time there would definitely be. Everything is normal.

Therefore, the correspondent of NewsRu is mistaken about what student rallies, where did he even get this from? No one will go anywhere without orders from above. Those who go will be put in their place. And everything will be resolved as it should be - according to the concepts. And this will be decided by the local God directly with the priests. Whose concepts ultimately turn out to be more understandable is the winner.

What is the conclusion from all this? It’s probably so bad not only at FIPP. I don't know, but it seems abnormal to me. In order not to exaggerate too much, I’ll try to finally say something good. At FIPP you sometimes come across good teachers, mostly graduate students. It’s unlikely that those from whom I studied are still teaching there, but God forbid others appear. There are students with whom I sympathize. There are very few of them, but some of them are stronger and smarter than me.

Hm. Nothing else seems good. Everything is rather very bad, but I have no doubt that somewhere it is much worse. This is a memo for applicants to the Faculty of History of Political Science and Law (FIPP) of the Russian State University for the Humanities.

Student at this university: RSUH. Institute of Linguistics (IL).

I have only been studying at this university for 1 semester, but I already have a certain idea about it. Overall - great. I don’t regret that I entered here (I had a choice: a budget at the Russian State University for the Humanities or a 75% discount at the Higher School of Economics).
Now, in order, about all the pros and cons.

ADMISSION.
The admissions office is staffed by students, in different rooms for different majors. There is a sign with the numbers of the required offices both on the website and in the lobby of any building. They fill out quickly, without problems, without unnecessary questions. On the day of submission, I indicated the availability of additional certificates to receive additional points, but did not bring copies of the documents; they called me in the evening and reminded me of this, asking me to bring them.

FRESH-YEAR MEETING.
All information necessary for first-year students is posted on the website at the end of August. A meeting takes place at which the essence of the training is explained. Each direction has its own curator of teachers and a team leader of students (but this does not mean that you can only contact them with questions, absolutely everyone is open: both students and teachers).

BUILDING.
I would like to pay special attention to the buildings on the street. Chayanova, 15 and st. Miusskaya, 6. Almost all the buildings are located in one place, which is very convenient. But they definitely require repairs (and not even cosmetic ones). I wouldn’t say that the plaster is falling right on my head, but in most classrooms the chairs are broken or missing, sometimes the desks shake, the toilets often have no paper, soap and paper towels, and they themselves are not in the best condition. But here the complaint is not against IL specifically, but against the Russian State University for the Humanities as a whole. There is a beautiful building on the street. Nikolskaya, 15, there is a faculty of historians and archivists. There is also a printing yard there, the first printing house, founded in 1553 under Ivan the Terrible, and RSUH students can visit such a historical place for free and without queues. There is also a building for computer scientists somewhere in the middle of nowhere (no one knows where it is except themselves).

DORMITORY.
It is almost impossible to get a hostel in the 1st year - you need to enroll on a budget at a minimum. They give places in the future if a person still needs and/or lives in other hostels (their prices are higher). I haven’t been in the building itself, I can only say that it is located near the Academician Yangel Street metro station.

ORGANIZATION.
IL is considered the faculty with the best organization, but even there there are some problems. This:
1. Schedule. The schedule is unstable, something changes every two or three weeks, something is removed, something is added, so you need to check it every week. Sometimes the schedule does not correspond to reality, for example, there are two pairs of subject N, of which only one will be taught due to the division into groups (but on the other hand, something is analyzed in more depth, since there are fewer students).
2. The working hours of teachers, departments or the dean’s office may not seem convenient to everyone; sometimes you have to run after them.
However, as I noted above, IL is the most organized place, so I’m even afraid to imagine what’s going on in other faculties.

EDUCATION.
In the 1st year we were given most of the general education subjects (economics, philosophy, history of Russia and history of the world, etc.), which, on the one hand, is very good, since many specialized subjects will follow. On the other hand, many people cannot stand this boredom and leave without waiting for something interesting. But specialized ones are also present, and are taught at a very high level (this also works in the opposite direction - there are many requirements for a good grade in the exam).

SESSION.
There is no session. That's exactly it. The subject is over - you pass it. Ended in mid-October? It’s not a question - here’s a test, decide, give me a record book. This system has its pros and cons: you can immediately be free from some tests, or you can arrive for classes at 10 a.m. in mid-January, and after that you can also manage to pass the exam.

CORRUPTION.
No and it cannot be.

LANGUAGE.
Separate item for language. They are taught to a very high level. Everyone comes out with knowledge, but for the sake of this knowledge you will have to work very hard, because they ask and demand a lot. The advantage is that the student himself chooses the language he wants to study (from those offered this year), priority goes to high-scoring students. Oriental languages ​​and rare European languages ​​are taught - in a word, for every taste.

COUPLES.
Lectures and seminars are open, i.e. When studying at IL, you can come and listen to what they teach at another department, if it’s interesting. No one will kick you out, the main thing is to warn the teacher. Most seminars are held in groups, but teachers allow you to go with the one with which you are comfortable.

COMPETITION AND PASSING SCORE.
The competition and passing scores can be viewed on the university website. But I want to explain why it is so big: there are a lot of applications and very few budget places. That's quite a bit. There is practically no competition for the scarf.
Points are a different story altogether. They change in very large leaps (compare: 2014 - 244; 2015 - 262; 2017 - 274 in the second waves). A couple more years, and the IL will also only be accepted for Olympiads.

EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES.
There are many sections and clubs for every taste - sports, intellectual games, KVN, choir (in my opinion, there are even two of them), theater club. There are student councils. Many events are organized, all sorts of festivals, competitions, and various public lectures and performances are often held. Anyone will find something to keep themselves busy.

I would also really like to note the warm relationship with the teachers. Almost immediately, upon entering IL, you understand that no one is your enemy here, everyone will help, answer questions, tell you what to do. And I think this is very important and very valuable.

Let me remind you once again that the review is specifically about IL, and I am delighted with it.

Result: IL - 10/10, RSUH (overall) - 7/10.

I support 44

Doctor of History, Professor

Teaching is conducted in six specialties:

• story
• political science
• jurisprudence
• public relations
• oriental studies
• socio-cultural service and tourism

Faculty structure

• Department of Russian History of Modern Times. Head of the department - Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor Dmitry Viktorovich Lukyanov (famous professors: A. A. Igolkin).
• Department of History and Theory of Historical Science. The head of the department is Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor Elena Vladimirovna Barysheva.
• Department of Theoretical and Applied Political Science. The head of the department is Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Valentina Dmitrievna Zimina.
• Department of History and Theory of State and Law. The head of the department is Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor Ryazanov Evgeniy Enkirovich.
• Department of Culture of Peace and Democracy. Head of the Department - Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Logunov, Alexander Petrovich(Deputy - Candidate of Historical Sciences Maria Aleksandrovna Gordeeva).
• Department of Social Communications and Technologies. Head - Associate Professor Michaelson Viktor Mikhailovich (deputy - Rev. Olga Anatolyevna Pichugina; head of the section "sociocultural service and tourism" - Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Lidiya Grigorievna Berezovaya).
• Department of Theory and Practice of Public Relations. The head of the department is Doctor of Philosophy, Professor Sergey Vyacheslavovich Klyagin.
• Educational and Scientific Mesoamerican Center named after. Yu. V. Knorozova . Director - Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Galina Gavrilovna Ershova.
• Department of Modern Oriental Studies. Director - Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Korotaev, Andrey Vitalievich(famous professors of the Center: Gromova, Nelly Vladimirovna ; Kosach, Grigory Grigorievich ; Nepomnin, Oleg Efimovich).

Links

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

See what "Faculty of History, Political Science and Law of the Russian State University for the Humanities" is in other dictionaries:

Faculty of History, Political Science and Law is a type of faculty in Russian universities. Known for: Faculty of History, Political Science and Law of the Russian State University for the Humanities Faculty of the Russian State University for the Humanities Faculty of History, Political Science and Law... ... Wikipedia

Faculty of History, Political Science and Law of the Russian State Humanitarian University The Faculty of History, Political Science and Law (FIPP) of the Russian State University for the Humanities was created in 1993. Dean of the Faculty Logunov, Alexander Petrovich, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor... ... Wikipedia

The "RGGU" request is redirected here. See also other meanings. Russian State Humanitarian University (RGGU) Founded 1991 Rector ... Wikipedia

- (IAI RSUH) Year of foundation 1930 Director Alexander Bezborodov ... Wikipedia

The "RGGU" request is redirected here; see also other meanings. Russian State Humanitarian University (RGGU) ... Wikipedia

The "RGGU" request is redirected here. See also other meanings. Russian State Humanitarian University (RGGU) Founded 1991 Rector ... Wikipedia

The "RGGU" request is redirected here. See also other meanings. Russian State Humanitarian University (RGGU) Founded 1991 Rector ... Wikipedia

The "RGGU" request is redirected here. See also other meanings. Russian State Humanitarian University (RGGU) Founded 1991 Rector ... Wikipedia

Books

• , The collection presents materials from the participants of the round table "Tolerance as the basis of liberal political discourse", held on August 12, 2013 in Moscow. Organizer... Publisher: Lenand,
• Tolerance as the basis of liberal political discourse, Medushevsky N.A. , The collection presents materials from participants in the round table 'Tolerance as the basis of liberal political discourse', held on August 12, 2013 in Moscow. Organizer... Publisher: LENAND, Manufacturer:

The journal was founded in 1996 (issue was resumed in 2006) and over the years of its existence has gained fame among the scientific community. The publication published articles by leading Russian (Yu.V. Irkhin, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Professor of RANEPA, A.D. Voskresensky, Doctor of Political Sciences, PhD, Professor of MGIMO (U) Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, etc.) and foreign (S. Beebe, PhD, Professor Emeritus at the University of San Marcos (USA), President of the National Communication Association (2013), T. Mottet, PhD, Professor at the University of Northwestern Missouri (USA), I. Klyukanov, PhD, Professor at Eastern Washington University ( USA), editor-in-chief of the peer-reviewed scientific journal Russian Journal of Communication, etc.) researchers, as well as graduate students, doctoral students and applicants who have successfully defended their dissertations; reports on major scientific conferences (International Conference “Cultural and Political Aspects of American Studies”, International Scientific Conference “Modeling Reality in the Space of Diversity”, International Conference “Political Design in the Space of Social Communications”, International Conference “Revolution as Transit: Domestic and International Contexts” ", International Scientific Conference "The First World War and the Consequences of the Collapse of European Empires", Regional Forum "Gender Equality in the Millennium Value System", etc.); reviews of scientific monographs.

The name and content of the headings of the publication correspond to the branches of science in accordance with the Nomenclature of scientific specialties for which academic degrees are awarded, approved by Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated February 25, 2009 No. 59 (as amended by Orders of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated August 11, 2009 No. 294, dated November 16 .2009 No. 603, dated January 10, 2012, No. 5, dated February 20, 2015, No. 114): 07.00.00 – Historical sciences, 23.00.00 – Political science.

O.I. Zaznaev, V.V. Sidorov
Presidential systems in the post-Soviet space: is Juan Linz's hypothesis correct?

History and modernity: current research

Bookshelf

Archive of numbers

Series “Oriental Studies. African Studies"

2009	2011	2012	2014
№ 8	№ 2 (64)	№ 20 (100)	№ 6 (128)
№ 13

Series “International Relations. Foreign regional studies"

2013	2014
№ 21 (122)	№ 18 (140)

Series " International relations. Regional studies»

2009	2010	2012	2014	2015
№ 14	№ 4 (47)	№ 7 (87)	№ 7 (129)	№ 13 (156)
		№ 19 (99)

Series “Political Science. Social and communication sciences"

2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014