The novel Oblomov is one of the iconic works of the 19th century, covering many social and philosophical themes. An important role in revealing the ideological meaning of the work is played by the analysis of the relationship in the book of the two main male characters. In the novel "Oblomov", the characterization of Oblomov and Stolz reflects their completely different natures, opposed by the author.
According to the plot of the work, the heroes are best friends from an early age, helping each other as much as possible even in adulthood: Stolz Oblomov - by solving many of his pressing problems, and Ilya Ilyich to Andrei Ivanovich - with pleasant conversations that allow Stolz to return to peace of mind.

Portrait characteristics of heroes

Comparative characteristics of Oblomov and Stolz in Goncharov's novel Oblomov are given by the author himself and is most remarkable when comparing their portrait characteristics, as well as characters. Ilya Ilyich is a soft, quiet, kind, dreamy, reflective goof who makes any decision at the behest of his heart, even if his mind leads the hero to the opposite conclusions. The appearance of the introverted Oblomov fully corresponds to his character - his movements are soft, lazy, round, and the image is characterized by excessive effeminacy, not typical for a man.

Stolz, both internally and externally, is completely different from Oblomov. The main thing in the life of Andrei Ivanovich is the rational grain, in all matters he relies only on reason, while the dictates of the heart, intuition and the sphere of feelings for the hero are not only something secondary, but are also inaccessible, incomprehensible to his rational reflections. Unlike Oblomov, "flabby beyond his years", Stolz seems to consist of "bones, muscles and nerves." His life is a rapid race forward, an important attribute of which is the constant self-development of the individual and continuous work. The images of Oblomov and Stolz seem to be a mirror image of each other: active, extroverted, successful in society and in the career field, Stolz is opposed to the lazy, apathetic, unwilling to communicate with anyone, let alone re-enter the service, Oblomov.

Differences in the upbringing of heroes

When comparing Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolz, as well as for a better understanding of the characters' images, it is important to briefly describe the atmosphere in which each of the characters grew up. Despite the "addictive", as if covering with a veil of half-asleep and laziness, Oblomovka's environment little Ilya was a cheerful, active and curious child, which at first is very similar to Stolz. He wanted to learn as much as possible about the world around him, but the excessive care of his parents, the "hothouse" upbringing, the inculcation of obsolete, obsolete and aimed at the ideals of the past, made the child a worthy successor of the traditions of "Oblomovism", the bearer of the "Oblomov" worldview - lazy, introverted, living in his own illusory world.

However, Stolz also did not grow the way he could have grown. At first glance, the combination in his upbringing of the strict approach of a German father and the tenderness of a noble mother of Russian origin would allow Andrei to become a harmonious, comprehensively developed personality. Nevertheless, as the author points out, Stolz grew "a cactus accustomed to drought." The young man lacked love, warmth and gentleness, since he was mainly raised by his father, who did not believe that a man needed to be instilled in sensitivity. However, Stolz's Russian roots until the end of his life were looking for this warmth, finding it in Oblomov, and then in the idea of ​​Oblomovka, which he denied.

Education and career of heroes

The inconsistency of the characters of Stolz and Oblomov manifests itself already in his youth, when Andrei Ivanovich, trying to learn as much as possible about the world around him, tried to instill in Ilya Ilyich a love of books, ignite a flame in him that would make him strive forward. And Stolz succeeded, but for a very short time - as soon as Oblomov remained himself, the book for him became less important than, for example, a dream. Somehow, rather, for his parents, Ilya Ilyich graduates from school, and then the university, where he was absolutely not interested, since the hero did not understand how mathematics and other sciences could be useful to him in life. Even a single failure in the service was the end of his career for him - it was too hard for the sensitive, soft Oblomov to rebuild under the strict rules of the capital world, far from the norms of life in Oblomovka.

Stolz, on the other hand, with his rational, active outlook on the world, is much easier to move up the career ladder, because any failure was more likely another incentive for him than a defeat. Andrei Ivanovich's continuous activity, high working capacity, the ability to please others made him a useful person at any workplace and a pleasant guest in any society, and all thanks to the purposefulness laid down by his father and the continuous thirst for knowledge, which his parents developed in Stolz in childhood.

Characteristics of Oblomov and Stolz as carriers of two opposite principles

In the critical literature, when comparing Oblomov and Stolz, it is widely believed that the characters are two opposites, two types of “superfluous” heroes who, in their “pure” form, cannot be found in real life, even though Oblomov is a realistic novel , and, therefore, the described images must be typical images. However, when analyzing the upbringing and formation of each of the characters, the reasons for Oblomov's apathy, laziness and dreaminess become clear, as well as excessive dryness, rationality, even a similarity with a certain Stolz mechanism.

Comparison of Stolz and Oblomov makes it possible to understand that both heroes are personalities not only typical of their time, but also tendentious images for any time. Oblomov is a typical son of wealthy parents, brought up in an atmosphere of love and heightened care, protected by his family from the need to work, decide something and actively act, because there will always be "Zakhar" who will do everything for him. Stolz, on the other hand, is a person who, from an early age, is accustomed to the need to work and work, while being deprived of love and care, which leads to a certain inner callousness of such a person, to a misunderstanding of the nature of feelings and emotional deprivation.

Product test

Goncharov's novel Oblomov was highly praised by critics of the second half of the 19th century. In particular, Belinsky noted that the work fell on the time and reflected the socio-political thought of the 50-60s of the nineteenth century. Two lifestyles - Oblomov and Stolz - are compared in this article.

Oblomov's characteristic

Ilya Ilyich was distinguished by his striving for peace, inaction. Oblomov cannot be called interesting and varied: he is used to spending most of the day in thought, lying on the couch. Plunging into these thoughts, he often did not get up from his bed, did not go out into the street, did not learn the latest news throughout the day. He did not read newspapers in principle, so as not to bother himself with unnecessary, and most importantly, meaningless information. Oblomov can be called a philosopher, he is worried about other issues: not everyday, not momentary, but eternal, spiritual. He is looking for meaning in everything.

When you look at him, one gets the impression that he is a happy free-thinker, not burdened with the hardships and problems of external life. But life "touches, gets everywhere" Ilya Ilyich, makes him suffer. Dreams remain only dreams, because he does not know how to translate them into real life. Even reading tires him: Oblomov has a lot of started books, but all of them remain unread, not understood. The soul seems to be dormant in him: he avoids unnecessary worries, worries, worries. In addition, Oblomov often compares his calm, secluded existence with the life of other people and finds that the way others live is not good for living: "When should we live?"

This is what Oblomov's ambiguous image is. "Oblomov" (Goncharov I.A.) was created in order to describe the personality of this character - uncommon and extraordinary in its own way. Impulses and deep emotional experiences are not alien to him. Oblomov is a true dreamer with a poetic, sensitive nature.

Stolz characteristic

Oblomov's lifestyle cannot be compared with Stolz's worldview. The reader first meets this character in the second part of the work. Andrey Stolz loves order in everything: his day is scheduled by hours and minutes, dozens of important things are planned that need to be urgently redone. Today he is in Russia, tomorrow, you see, he has suddenly gone abroad. What Oblomov finds boring and meaningless is important and significant for him: trips to cities, villages, intentions to improve the quality of life of those around him.

He opens in his soul such treasures that Oblomov cannot even guess about. Stolz's way of life consists entirely of activity, which feeds his entire being with the energy of vigor. In addition, Stolz is a good friend: more than once he helped Ilya Ilyich in business matters. The lifestyle of Oblomov and Stolz is different from each other.

What is Oblomovism?

As a social phenomenon, the concept denotes a focus on the idle, monotonous, devoid of colors and any changes in life. Andrei Stolts called Oblomov's lifestyle itself, Oblomov's striving for endless peace and lack of any activity. Despite the fact that a friend constantly pushed Oblomov to the possibility of changing the way of existence, he did not budge at all, as if he did not have enough energy to do it. At the same time, we see that Oblomov admits his mistake, uttering the following words: "I have long been ashamed to live in the world." He feels useless, unnecessary and abandoned, and therefore he does not want to dust off the table, take apart books that have been lying around for a month, and leave the apartment once again.

Love in the understanding of Oblomov

Oblomov's lifestyle did not in any way contribute to the acquisition of real, and not fictitious, happiness. He dreamed and made plans more than he really lived. Amazingly, in his life there was a place for quiet rest, philosophical reflections on the essence of life, but there was not enough strength for decisive action and implementation of intentions. Love for Olga Ilyinskaya temporarily pulls Oblomov out of his usual existence, makes him try new things, start taking care of himself. He even forgets old habits and sleeps only at night, and does business during the day. But still, love in Oblomov's worldview is directly related to dreams, thoughts and poetry.

Oblomov considers himself unworthy of love: he doubts whether Olga can love him, whether he suits her enough, whether he is able to make her happiness. Such thoughts lead him to sad thoughts about his useless life.

Love as understood by Stolz

Stolz approaches the question of love more rationally. He does not indulge in ephemeral dreams in vain, as he looks at life soberly, without imagination, without the habit of analyzing. Stolz is a business man. He does not need romantic walks in the moonlight, loud declarations of love and sighs on the bench, because he is not Oblomov. Stolz's lifestyle is very dynamic and pragmatic: he makes an offer to Olga at the moment when he realizes that she is ready to accept him.

What did Oblomov come to?

As a result of protective and careful behavior, Oblomov misses the opportunity to build a close relationship with Olga Ilyinskaya. His marriage was upset shortly before the wedding - it took too long to get ready, explained, asked himself, compared, figured out, analyzed Oblomov. The characterization of the image of Oblomov Ilya Ilyich teaches not to repeat the mistakes of an idle, aimless existence, raises the question of what love really is? Is she the subject of sublime, poetic aspirations, or is it the calm joy, peace that Oblomov finds in the house of the widow of Agafya Pshenitsyna?

Why did Oblomov's physical death come?

The result of Ilya Ilyich's philosophical reflections is as follows: he chose to bury in himself former aspirations and even lofty dreams. with Olga, his life focused on everyday life. He knew no greater joy than a delicious meal and an afternoon nap. Gradually, the engine of his life began to stop, subside: ailments and cases became more frequent.Even previous thoughts left him: there was no longer a place for them in a quiet room that looked like a coffin, in all this sluggish life that lulled Oblomov, more and more distanced him from reality. Mentally, this man had been dead for a long time. Physical death was only a confirmation of the falsity of his ideals.

Stolz's achievements

Stolz, unlike Oblomov, did not miss his chance to become happy: he built family well-being with Olga Ilyinskaya. This marriage was accomplished out of love, in which Stolz did not fly into the clouds, did not stay in destructive illusions, but acted more than reasonably and responsibly.

The lifestyles of Oblomov and Stolz are diametrically opposed and opposed to each other. Both characters are unique, inimitable and significant in their own way. This may explain the strength of their friendship over the years.

Each of us is close to either the Stoltz or Oblomov type. There is nothing wrong with that, and the coincidences are likely to be only partial. Those who are deep, loving to reflect on the essence of life, most likely, will understand Oblomov's experiences, his restless mental rushes and searches. Business pragmatists who have left romance and poetry far behind will embody themselves with Stolz.

All his life Goncharov dreamed of finding harmony of feeling and reason for people. He reflected on the strength and poverty of the "man of reason", on the charm and weakness of the "man of the heart." In Oblomov, this idea became one of the leading ones. In this novel, two types of male characters are opposed: passive and weak Oblomov, with his heart of gold and pure soul, and energetic Stolz, overcoming any circumstances with the strength of his mind and will. However, the human ideal of Goncharov is not personified in either one or the other. Stolz does not seem to the writer a more complete personality than Oblomov, whom he also looks at with "sober eyes." Unbiasedly exposing the "extremes" of the nature of both, Goncharov advocated the completeness and integrity of the human spiritual world with all the diversity of its manifestations.

Each of the main characters of the novel had their own understanding of the meaning of life, their own ideals in life, which they dreamed of realizing.

At the beginning of the story, Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is a little over thirty years old, he is a columnar nobleman, the owner of three hundred and fifty souls of serfs, inherited by him. After serving three years after graduating from Moscow University in one of the Moscow departments, he retired with the rank of collegiate secretary. Since then he lived in St. Petersburg without a break. The novel begins with a description of one of his days, his habits and character. Oblomov's life by that time had turned into a lazy "crawling from day to day." Having retired from vigorous activity, he lay on the sofa and irritatedly argued with Zakhar, his serf servant who looked after him. Revealing the social roots of Oblomovism, Goncharov shows that "it all began with the inability to put on stockings, and ended with the inability to live."

Raised in a patriarchal noble family, Ilya Ilyich perceived life in Oblomovka, his family estate, with its peace and inaction as the ideal of human existence.
Three main acts of life were constantly played out in front of little Ilya in childhood: homeland, weddings, funerals. Then followed their divisions: christenings, name days, family holidays. All life's pathos is focused on this. This was the "wide expanse of the lordly life" with its idleness, which forever became the ideal of life for Oblomov.

All Oblomovites treated work as a punishment and did not like it, considering it something humiliating. Therefore, life in the eyes of Ilya Ilyich was divided into two halves. One consisted of toil and boredom, and these were synonyms for him. The other is out of peace and peaceful fun. In Oblomovka, Ilya Ilyich was also instilled with a sense of superiority over other people. The “other” cleans his own boots, dresses himself, and runs off for whatever is needed. This "other" has to work tirelessly. Ilyusha, however, "was raised tenderly, he did not endure either cold or hunger, he did not know the need, he did not earn bread for himself, he did not engage in black work." And he considered studying as a punishment sent by heaven for sins, and avoided schoolwork whenever possible. After graduating from the university, he was no longer engaged in his education, was not interested in science, art, politics.

When Oblomov was young, he expected a lot from fate and from himself. He was preparing to serve the fatherland, to play a prominent role in public life, and dreamed of family happiness. But days went by, and he was still going to start life, he was drawing his future in his mind. However, "the flower of life blossomed and did not bear fruit."

The future service seemed to him not in the form of harsh activity, but in the form of some kind of "family occupation." It seemed to him that the officials, serving together, constituted a friendly and close family, all members of which tirelessly care for mutual pleasure. However, his youthful ideas were deceived. Unable to withstand the difficulties, he resigned, serving only three years and not having accomplished anything significant.

It happened that, lying on the sofa, he would be inflamed with a desire to point out to mankind its vices. He will quickly change two or three positions, stand up on the bed with sparkling eyes and look around with inspiration. It seems that his lofty effort is about to turn into a feat and bring good consequences to humanity. Sometimes he imagines himself an invincible commander: he will invent a war, organize new crusades, perform feats of goodness and magnanimity. Or, imagining himself as a thinker, an artist, he reaps laurels in his imagination, everyone worships him, the crowd chases after him. However, in reality, he was not able to understand the management of his own estate and easily became the prey of such scammers as Tarantyev and the "brother" of his landlady.

Over time, he developed remorse that haunted him. He was hurt for his underdevelopment, for the heaviness that prevented him from living. He was gnawed by envy that others live so fully and widely, and something prevents him from boldly going through life. He painfully felt that a good and bright beginning was buried in him, as in a grave. He tried to find the culprit outside himself and did not find it. However, apathy and indifference quickly replaced anxiety in his soul, and he again slept peacefully on his sofa.

Even his love for Olga did not revive him to practical life. Faced with the need to act, overcoming the difficulties that got in the way, he was frightened and retreated. Having settled on the Vyborg side, he completely abandoned himself to the cares of Agafya Pshenitsyna, finally removing himself from active life.

In addition to this inability brought up by the lordship, many other things prevent Oblomov from being active. He really feels the objectively existing separation of the “poetic” and “practical” in life, and this is the reason for his bitter disappointment.

If at the beginning of the novel Goncharov speaks more about Oblomov's laziness, then at the end the theme of Oblomov's "golden heart" sounds more and more insistently, which he carried unharmed through life. Oblomov's misfortune is connected not only with the social environment, the influence of which he could not resist. It is also contained in the "fatal excess of the heart." The gentleness, delicacy, vulnerability of the hero disarm his will and make him powerless in front of people and circumstances.

In contrast to the passive and inactive Oblomov, Stolz was conceived by the author as a completely unusual figure. Goncharov strove to make him attractive to the reader by his "efficiency", rational skillful practicality. Until now, these qualities have not been characteristic of the heroes of Russian literature.

The son of a German burgher and a Russian noblewoman, Andrei Stolts from childhood, thanks to his father, received a labor, practical education. It, combined with the poetic influence of his mother, made him a special person. Unlike the rounded Oblomov, he was thin, all consisted of muscles and nerves. Some freshness and strength emanated from him. "As in his body there was nothing superfluous, so in the moral functions of his life, he sought the balance of practical aspects with the subtle needs of the spirit." "Through life he walked firmly, cheerfully, lived on a budget, trying to spend every day like every ruble." He attributed the cause of any failure to himself, "and did not hang it like a caftan on someone else's nail." He strove to develop a simple and direct outlook on life. Most of all he was afraid of the imagination, "this two-faced companion", and any dream, so everything mysterious and mysterious had no place in his soul. Everything that is not subjected to the analysis of experience does not correspond to practical truth, he considered a deception.

Although Oblomov has nothing to object to Stolz's reproaches, some kind of spiritual righteousness lies in Ilya Ilyich's confession that he did not manage to understand this life.

If at the beginning of the novel Goncharov speaks more about Oblomov's laziness, then at the end the theme of Oblomov's “golden heart” sounds more and more insistently, which he carried unharmed through life. Oblomov's misfortune is connected not only with the social environment, the influence of which he could not resist. It is also contained in the "fatal excess of the heart." The gentleness, delicacy, vulnerability of the hero disarm his will and make him powerless in front of people and circumstances.

Page 1 ]

I.A. Goncharov, in his novel, touches on a very relevant topic of the opposition of labor and laziness, which for centuries has remained the most discussed and controversial. In our time, this topic is very problematic, since in our modern society there is a progress in technology and people stop working, laziness develops into the meaning of life.

The heroes of the novel Oblomov and Stolz are friends from early childhood. Their acquaintance takes place while studying in the house of Stolz's father, who taught the basics of the most important sciences.

Ilya Oblomov comes from a noble family, from early childhood little Ilya is cared for and cherished. Parents and nannies forbid him to show any independent activity. Ilya, seeing this to himself, the attitude immediately realized that you can do nothing, since other people will do it all for him. His training took place in the Stolz house, he did not particularly want to study, and his parents indulged him in this. This is how Oblomov's entire youth passed. Adult life was no different from childhood and adolescence, Oblomov continues to lead a calm and lazy lifestyle. His passivity and indolence are reflected in everyday life. He woke up for dinner, slowly climbed out of bed, lazily ate food and was not interested in any business. Laziness, inherent in childhood, did not give Oblomov the slightest chance to strive for science, for knowledge of the world around him. Despite all this, his imagination was very well developed, since due to idleness, Oblomov's imaginary world was very rich. Oblomov was also a very gullible person, and the main whom Ilya trusted was Andrei Stolts. Schtolz is the complete opposite of Oblomov. From early childhood, Andrei was accustomed to order, to work. His parents raised him strictly, but justly. His father, a German by nationality, instilled in Andrey accuracy, hard work and punctuality. From a young age, Andrei carried out various assignments of his father, tempering his character. He studied together with Ilya, with his father, unlike Oblomov, Andrey was good at science, and he studied them with curiosity. Stolz's transition from childhood to adulthood happened very early, so Andrei was a very active person. He strove for constant replenishment of knowledge, because “learning is light, and ignorance is darkness. He had a sober and practical view of the events taking place, he never did anything hastily without thinking about the issue that he needed to solve. Prudence and punctuality, laid down from childhood, found a place for themselves in Stolz's adult life. Mobility and energy helped him in any endeavors. Considering the life positions of Oblomov and Stolz in relation to Olga Ilyinskaya, the following conclusions can be drawn: Oblomov, living in his own world - "Oblomovshchina", was a romantic who took a long time to decide on concrete steps in real life. Their acquaintance with Olga Ilyinskaya is due to Stolz. Their relationship from the very beginning was not strong. Olga, knowing a lot about Oblomov from Stolz's stories, tries to bring Oblomov back to life by means of her love, but she fails to do this and Oblomovshchina wins. The relationship between Olga and Andrei develops by themselves throughout life, "she laughs at his jokes, and he listens with pleasure to her singing." They had a lot in common, but the most important thing was that they strived for life, this contributed to their rapprochement and the formation of a family.

Be that as it may, the fates of both heroes are relatively successful. Stolz finds his happiness with Olga, and Oblomov finds his Oblomovka in a house on the Vyborg side and lives out his life there with the woman he always dreamed of. This denouement shows that the author's position in relation to both of his characters is positive.

After reading the novel by I.A. Goncharova "Oblomov", I am inclined to think that the events described in this work can be applicable to our time, since in modern society there are many people like Stolz and Oblomov. And their confrontation will be eternal.

Introduction

Goncharov's work Oblomov is a socio-psychological novel based on the literary method of antithesis. The principle of opposition can be traced both when comparing the characters of the main characters, and their basic values ​​and life path. Comparison of the way of life of Oblomov and Stolz in the novel "Oblomov" makes it possible to better understand the ideological concept of the work, to understand the reasons for the tragedy of the fate of both heroes.

Features of the heroes' lifestyle

The central character of the novel is Oblomov. Ilya Ilyich is afraid of life's difficulties, does not want to do anything or decide. Any difficulty and the need to act cause sadness in the hero and even more immerse him in an apathetic state. That is why Oblomov, after the first failure in the service, no longer wanted to try his hand at his career and hid from the outside world on his favorite couch, trying not only not to leave the house, but also not even to get out of bed unless absolutely necessary. The way of life of Ilya Ilyich is similar to a slow dying - both spiritual and physical. The hero's personality is gradually degrading, and he himself is completely immersed in illusions and dreams that are not destined to come true.

On the contrary, Stolz's difficulties spur him on, any mistake for him is just an excuse to move on, achieving more. Andrei Ivanovich is in constant motion - business trips, meetings with friends and social events are an integral part of his life. Stolz looks at the world soberly and rationally, in his life there are no surprises, illusions and strong shocks, because he calculated everything in advance and understands what to expect in each specific situation.

The lifestyle of the heroes and their childhood

The development and formation of the images of Oblomov and Stolz is shown by the author from the earliest years of the heroes. Their childhood, adolescence and adulthood pass in different ways, they are instilled with different values ​​and life guidelines, which only emphasizes the dissimilarity of the characters.

Oblomov grew like a greenhouse plant, fenced off from the possible influences of the surrounding world. Parents pampered little Ilya in every possible way, indulged his desires, were ready to do everything to make their son happy and satisfied. The very atmosphere of Oblomovka, the hero's native estate, requires special attention. Slow, lazy, and poorly educated villagers saw labor as a kind of punishment. Therefore, they tried to avoid him in every possible way, and if they had to work, they worked reluctantly, without any inspiration or desire. Naturally, this could not but affect Oblomov, from an early age absorbed the love of an idle life, absolute idleness, when Zakhar can always do everything for you - as lazy and slow as his master. Even when Ilya Ilyich finds himself in a new, urban environment, he does not want to change his lifestyle and start working intensively. Oblomov simply closes himself off from the outside world and creates in his imagination a certain idealized prototype of Oblomovka, in which he continues to “live”.

Stolz's childhood goes on differently, which is primarily due to the roots of the hero - a strict German father tried to raise a worthy bourgeois from his son, who could achieve everything in life on his own, without fear of any work. The refined mother of Andrei Ivanovich, on the contrary, wanted her son to achieve a brilliant secular reputation in society, so from an early age she instilled in him a love of books and arts. All this, as well as the evenings and receptions regularly held at the Stoltsev estate, influenced little Andrei, forming an extroverted, educated and purposeful personality. The hero was interested in everything new, he knew how to confidently move forward, so after graduating from university he easily took his place in society, becoming an indispensable person for many. Unlike Oblomov, who perceived any activity as an aggravating necessity (even university studies or reading a long book), for Stolz his activities were an impetus for further personal, social and career development.

Similarities and differences in the way of life of the heroes

If the differences in the lifestyles of Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolz are noticeable and obvious almost immediately, correlating, respectively, as a passive lifestyle leading to degradation and an active one aimed at all-round development, then their similarity is visible only after a detailed analysis of the characters. Both heroes are "superfluous" people for their era, they both do not live in the present time, and therefore are in a constant search for themselves and their true happiness. The introverted, sluggish Oblomov with all his might clings to his past, to the “paradise”, idealized Oblomovka - a place where he will always feel good and calm.

Stolz, on the other hand, strives exclusively for the future. He perceives his past as a valuable experience and does not try to cling to it. Even their friendship with Oblomov is full of unrealizable plans for the future - about how you can transform the life of Ilya Ilyich, make it brighter and more real. Stolz is always one step ahead, so it is difficult for him to be an ideal husband for Olga (however, Oblomov's "extra" nature in the novel also becomes an obstacle to the development of relations with Olga).

Such isolation from others and inner loneliness, which Oblomov fills with illusions, and Stolz with thoughts of work and self-improvement, and become the basis of their friendship. The characters unconsciously see in each other the ideal of their own existence, while completely denying the lifestyle of their friend, considering him either too active and saturated (Oblomov was even upset that he had to walk in boots for a long time, and not in his usual soft slippers), then excessively lazy and inactive (at the end of the novel, Stolz says that it was "Oblomovism" that killed Ilya Ilyich).

Conclusion

Using the example of the lifestyle of Oblomov and Stolz, Goncharov showed how the fates of people who come from the same social stratum, but received a different upbringing, can differ. Depicting the tragedy of both characters, the author shows that a person cannot live, hiding from the whole world in an illusion or giving himself excessively to others, up to mental exhaustion - in order to be happy, it is important to find harmony between these two directions.

Product test