Chatsky's life ideals in the comedy "Woe from Wit" by Griboyedov. An essay on the topic: The life ideals of Famus society in the comedy Woe from Wit Griboyedov The image of Famusov life principles ideals moral

The comedy "Woe from Wit" was enthusiastically received by the revolutionary-minded nobles. It reflected the life of Russia, the spirit of the era, exposed the state of Russian society. The basis of the comedy by Griboyedov was the clash of the views of the Decembrists with the reactionary mass of the nobility. In his work, Griboyedov posed a number of important problems: the problem of serfdom and the relationship between the noble landowners and the serf peasantry, the problem of public service, education and culture, false and true patriotism. The problematic gave the comedy an acute political character.

"A bunch of monsters of society, of which each caricatured some opinion, rule, thought, perverting their legitimate meaning in their own way ..." (Gogol).

Griboyedov, a realist, brought to the stage a whole crowd of inhabitants of noble Moscow. These are "aces", as they proudly call themselves, rich and noble nobles. They are famous not only for their merits in the service field, not for their excellent performance of civic duty, not for orders and wounds received on the battlefields. No! We know that a certain Tatiana Yurievna is respected here for the fact that she

Balls can not be richer
From Christmas to Lent
And summer holidays in the country.

Drawing to himself the ideals of a person from whom one should learn to live, Famusov says:

He's not right on silver
I ate on gold, a hundred people at service,
All in medals, he went forever in a train.
Wealth is the main thing for them,
Be inferior, but if you have enough
Souls of one thousand two generic
He and the groom.

They treated people poorer than themselves with contempt. They can "admit" the poor man to themselves if they need him, but they never miss an opportunity to arrogantly reproach him:

“I warmed Bezrodny and brought him into my family.
Gave the rank of assessor and took him to secretaries
Transferred to Moscow through my assistance,
And if it weren't for me, you would smoke in Tver "-

reminds Famusov Molchalin.

The Moscow nobility is a circle of closely related acquaintances. Connections help them do business, get new ranks and positions. They help out here, but only a "dear person", here they go to visit Tatyana Yurievna, but more because

Officials and officials -
All her friends and all her relatives.

They are promoted here only to

And take the award and have fun.

Famusov enthusiastically tells young people about the nobleman Maxim Petrovich, who served even under Catherine. This is the ideal of the entire noble society. Maxim Petrovich, seeking a place at the court, did not show any business merits or talents, but only, as Chatsky wittily remarks, "courageously sacrificed the back of his head," that is, he fell in the favor of the empress, and became famous for the fact that his neck often bent in bows.

And many visitors to Famusov's house create honor and wealth for themselves in the same way as this old nobleman.

“Whoever needs it, the arrogance in the dust,
And to those who are higher, flattery was woven like lace. "

For example, Repetilov, in order to take his place in society, used the same workarounds:

"Baron von Klaz as ministers methyl,
And I -
I went straight to his son-in-law. "

And Skalozub? From his story we learn that in August 1813 he "sat down in a trench", that is, apparently hiding in a hiding place. After such a "brilliant" military feat, Skalozub not only received an order "on the neck", but is about to be promoted to general. And here he hopes not for his own merits, but for completely different reasons:

“The vacancies are just open,
Then the elders will turn off others,
Others, you look killed. "

The Moscow higher nobility lives monotonously and is not interesting. Let's go to Famusov's house. Guests gather here every day. What are they doing? Dinner, playing cards, talking about money and clothes, gossip. Everyone here knows about others: they envy successes, gloatingly celebrate failures. Chatsky has not yet appeared, but here they are already slandering about his failures in the service. Princess Tugoukhovskaya is jealous of Princess Khryumina, and Countess Khryumina is “evil to the whole world,” Khlesgova starts a quarrel with Famusov and Skalozub.

With what pleasure these bored gossips seized on Sophia's invention about Chatsky's madness. The rumor instantly spreads through the rooms, the gossip is picked up and fanned by people who do not even know, who have not seen Chatsky.

Here are their little thoughts and ridiculous inventions. Turns out to be crazy because

I went according to my mother, according to Anna Alekseevna,
The deceased went crazy 8 times.

He allegedly drank champagne in "glasses", "bottles," and large and "forties barrels." And what awareness of other people's affairs these bored bums show! A lively conversation turns into an argument - but about what? Yes, of course, about Chatsky's wealth. How many serf souls does he have? The furious Khlestova raps out:

"No, three hundred - I really don't know other people's estates!"

Is there any other information in their minds besides other people's wealth? No, none of them reads newspapers, and if they come across a printed word, how many evil thoughts it will evoke!

Enlightenment for them is a plague, a danger that threatens the usual structures of life. Famusov says with hatred:

"Learning is the plague, learning is the reason,
What's more important now than when
Insane divorced people, and deeds and opinions ", -

and ends his thought with a categorical demand:

"...no! if you do not stop:
Collect all the books and burn! "

Moscow nobles are arrogant and arrogant. He treats people poorer than himself highly. But especially contempt is heard in the remarks addressed to the serfs. They are "filki", "fomki", "chumps", "lazy teteries". One conversation with them

“To work you! To settle you! "

The nobles do not see in their servants people similar to themselves. Moreover, this applies to people of a different race. Talking about her purchase, Khlesgova forgets that she bought not a little animal, but a man:

“What is my arap for services:
Curly! The hump of the shoulder blade!
Angry! All cat grips!
After all, the Lord created such a tribe!
Damn it. "

And in the monologue "Who are the judges?" Chatsky tells with indignation how the nobles, “overflowing in feasts and extravagance,” dispose of the lives of their serfs. Here is a portrait of a serf owner:

“That Nestor of noble villains,
A crowd surrounded by servants
Zealous, they are in the hours of wine and fight
And honor and his life saved him, suddenly
He traded three greyhounds for them !!! "

The Moscow nobles boast of their patriotism, their love for their native city, for their country Famusov enthusiastically tells Skalozub about "a special imprint on all Moscow people." But we notice that there is just little Russian, simple and natural in them. On the contrary, everything in them, starting from their semi-Russian language, outfits "with taffeta, marigold and haze" and their attitude to their people, is deeply alien to the Russian. The girls sing French romances, read French books, Russian names in a foreign way in Moscow.

“The door is open for the invited and uninvited,
Especially from foreign ones. "

In a closed formation, the Famusians oppose everything new and advanced. Here Skalozub tells with irritation about his cousin, who

“I've got a lot of new rules,
Chin followed him, he suddenly left the service,
I began to read books in the village. "

This behavior is "not correct" according to Famusov and Skalozub. They themselves can be polyberal, but they are afraid of radical changes:

“It's not that novelties were introduced - never,
Save us, god! No".

And when Chatsky dared to "publicly" announce five or six "sound" thoughts, how frightened the old master Famusov! He called Chatsky a "dangerous man" and his thoughts "cheating ideas." For him, brought up in the spirit of the Maximov Petrovich, in the past 18th century, the 19th century seems to be a dangerous time. In every person like him, Famusov sees "carbonara", "freemason", "Voltairian".

There are many members of the Famus society, each of them has its own personal traits, but all of them are united in one camp by the ideals “And take reward and live happily”, “And the golden bag marks the generals!” in front of advanced people.

Ideals and views of Chatsky (Griboyedov)

The action of the comedy by A. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" takes place in those years when the split in the nobility is becoming more and more obvious. This was the beginning of the 20s of the 19th century.

The influence of the ideas of the French enlighteners, the growth of Russian national consciousness after the war of 1812 and foreign campaigns united many young nobles in an effort to change society.

But most of the Russian nobility remained deaf or hostile to new trends. It was this situation, this conflict that Griboyedov captured in his work.

note

The main conflict of comedy is a conflict of two worldviews, a clash of the "present century" with the "past century."

In the comedy, there is also a second conflict - love (there is even a classic love triangle: Chatsky - Sofya - Molcha-lin), but it is not the main one, although both conflicts are closely intertwined and complement each other, both of them find their resolution at the end of the play.

The bearer of new, progressive ideas is Alexander Chatsky, his ideological opponent in comedy is the entire Famus society. Why was their collision inevitable? Because Ideals and views of Chatsky did not coincide and could not coincide with the views and ideals of Famusov.

First of all, they have different views on the service. If for Famusov service is only a source of ranks, wealth, then for Chatsky it is a civic duty of every young nobleman. Chatsky is ready to serve, but "to the cause, not to persons", to the Fatherland, and not to a higher-ranking official.

He tried to serve, he even knew the ministers, but then he retired and broke off his previous acquaintances, as he was convinced that it was impossible to serve honestly, without serving, at that time. Chatsky replies to Famusov's advice "to go to serve": "I would be glad to serve, it is sickening to serve."

In the monologue “And sure enough, the world began to become stupid,” he indignantly speaks of those officials who “not in war, but in the world, took their foreheads, knocked on the floor without regret!”. Chatsky calls the past century very accurately: "The century of obedience and fear was direct."

But for Famusov it was a "golden" age; it is not for nothing that he sets his uncle Maxim Petrovich as an example for Chatsky, who, having stumbled at the reception, managed to make the tsarina laugh and win her favor.

For Skalozub and Molchalin, careers are the main thing in life, and they are ready to achieve ranks by any means, even humiliation and flattery. Skalozub's dream is “if only I could become a general”.

Alexander Andreevich appears in comedy as a fierce opponent of serfdom. And this is understandable: he expresses views on the social structure of Russia not only of the author himself, but also of many of his Decembrist friends, who believed that an educated, enlightened person should not own other people.

Chatsky speaks with anger about a certain serf-owner, "Nestor of the noble scoundrels", who exchanged his faithful servants, who more than once saved his life and honor "in the hours of wine and fight", for "three greyhounds".

Chatsky in the monologue "Who are the judges?" denounces those "fatherland of fathers" who, "are rich in robbery", "found protection from the court in friends, in kinship, splendid edifices of chambers, where they spill in feasts and extravagance", denounces "the most vile features of the past life." Himself
Chatsky treats the people with great respect, he calls them "our smart, cheerful people."

It is impossible to imagine Chatsky in the role of a serf-owner; it is not for nothing that Famusov advises him not to manage "the estate in error. Chatsky values \u200b\u200ba person according to his intelligence, education, and not according to the number of serf souls or rank. Therefore, for him, a certain Foma Fomich, a well-known and important official, is just "an empty person, of the most stupid."

Chatsky stands up for the freedom of the individual, for the human right to decide his own destiny: to serve or not to serve, to engage in science or art, to live in a village or in a city. Chatsky is a supporter of enlightenment, education, and all these Chatsky's views cause horror of rejection among his ideological opponents.

Ideals and views of Chatsky - this is Ideals and views a true patriot; he sarcastically speaks of a certain Frenchman from Bordeaux, who, at an evening in Famusov's house, told the assembled guests “how he got ready for the journey to Russia, to the barbarians, with fear and tears,” but when he arrived, “he found that there was no end I did not meet the sound of a Russian or a Russian face ... ”. This Frenchman felt like a "little tsar", and Chatsky yearns with all his soul,

So that the Lord destroy this unclean spirit
Empty, slavish, blind imitation ...

In the comedy, Chatsky is tragically lonely, he has no supporters among the main characters, but there are two off-stage characters that we can attribute to the main character's supporters.

First of all, this is Skalozub's cousin, who unexpectedly retired and “began reading books in the village,” and Princess Tugouhovskoy's nephew, about whom she indignantly says: “Chinov does not want to know! He is a chemist, he is a botanist, Prince Fyodor, my nephew. "

In a clash with Famusian society, Chatsky is defeated. This defeat was inevitable, since the Chatskys were still too few in society. As IA Goncharov wrote in the critical study “Million of Torments”: “Chatsky is broken by the amount of old power, inflicting a mortal blow on it with the quality of fresh power”.

But such as Chatsky, Goncharov called "advanced warriors, skirmishers" who are the first to enter the battle and almost always die.

But thoughts, ideas, Ideals and views of Chatsky were not in vain, such Chatskys will come out to Senate Square on December 14, 1825, where they will clash with the world of the Famusovs, the silent ones and the puffers.

Griboyedov, Woe from Wit. What are the moral and life ideals of the Famus society?

Woe from Wit - the famous work of Griboyedov, which depicts the life of the country after the Patriotic War of 1812. This is a life where two camps collided.

The first camp is an advanced, Decembrist outlook, a new outlook on life, on its foundations. The second camp is the nobility, or the past century, they are also Famus society.

We will talk about the ideals of Famus society in this essay, having considered both their moral and life ideals.

To understand what are the ideals in Famus society, to highlight their ideals and values, it is enough to get acquainted with the work of Griboyedov. In it, the author, depicting the past century, creates images of the noble nobles of Moscow, who call themselves aces, they are also representatives of the Famus society.

The life ideals of the Famus society

Who is a person from this circle and what are their life ideals? Here we see only the rich, noblemen, so to speak, the capital's elite. They all come from noble families, and the ideals of these people are simple and understandable.

Famusov, talking about the ideals of a person, says so, be inferior, but if there are two thousand family souls, he is the groom. So, Skalozub was a good candidate for suitors, because he was aiming for generals, besides, he also had a golden bag.

note

But if there is no money, if a person is poor, then the Famus society will treat him with contempt. You can not even talk about serfs, because they are generally not considered people, calling them chumps and crowbars. Again, to be respected by the elite, you need wealth.

So for example, Tatyana Yuryevna is respected, because she arranges rich balls.

The moral ideals of the Famus society

He just sacrificed the back of his head, his neck just often bowed. Worst of all, many members of this environment also receive honor and wealth. The same Skolozub is no better.

According to his story, in 1813 he just sat out in hiding, and after such an outstanding feat he received a medal, and now he is expecting a general's rank.

The ideal of Famusian society is definitely not enlightenment, because enlightenment and teaching are like a plague for them. People who are engaged in science and creativity are useless people for society. Famusov believes that education only hurts, so he would simply burn all the books. And they themselves don't even read newspapers.

Famus' entourage is also false patriots. They only talk about patriotism, they themselves do nothing for the country. Although there are ranks, they are not deserved in the performance of military or civic duty. In their conversation, foreign words are constantly heard, they listen to French romances, they follow French fashion.

So what characterizes Famus society? And here we can summarize. Famus society is characterized by fear of the new, fear of progress, and the ideal is lack of education and conservatism. So they live by the principle: take reward and have fun.

Chatsky's ideals (based on the comedy "Woe from Wit")

Works ›Griboyedov A.S. ›Woe from Wit

Ready Homework

In my comedy, there are 25 fools for one sane person. And this person, of course, in contradiction with the society around him, no one understands, no one wants to forgive, why is he a little taller than others.

A.S. Griboyedov

A.S. Griboyedov brought to the stage two opposing camps - the camp of young Russia and the camp of the serf-owners. Their struggle was a phenomenon of Russian life in the tenties and twenties of the XIX century.

At this time, noble revolutionaries stood out from the general mass of the nobility - supporters of the struggle against everything that had become obsolete in the social and political system, supporters of the battle for a new thing for the movement of the country forward.

How does Molchalin reveal himself during a dialogue with Chatsky? How does he behave and what gives him the right to behave this way?

Molchalin is cynical and frank with Chatsky about his views on life. He talks, from his point of view, with a loser (“You were not given the ranks, did you fail in the service?”), Gives advice to go to Tatyana Yurievna, is sincerely surprised by Chatsky’s sharp comments about her and Foma Fomich, who “under three ministers was the head of the department ". His condescending, even instructive tone, as well as the story of his father's will, are explained by the fact that he does not depend on Chatsky, that Chatsky, for all his talents, does not enjoy the support of Famus society, because their views are sharply different. And, of course, a considerable right to behave this way in a conversation with Chatsky gives Molchalin his success with Sophia. The principles of Molchalin's life may seem only ridiculous ("to please all people without exception", to have two talents - "moderation and accuracy", "after all, you must depend on others"), but the well-known dilemma "Is Molchalin ridiculous or scary?" in this scene it is decided - terrible. Molchalin spoke and expressed his views.

What are the moral and life ideals of the Famus society?

Analyzing the monologues and dialogues of the characters in the second act, we have already touched upon the ideals of Famus society. Some principles are expressed aphoristically: "And take awards, and have fun", "I just got to be a general!" Famusov's guests' ideals are expressed in the scenes of their arrival at the ball. Here Princess Khlestova, knowing well the price of Zagoretsky ("He is a liar, a gambler, a thief / I was from him and the door was locked ..."), accepts him, because he is a "master to please", got a little arap girl as a gift. Wives subordinate their husbands to their will (Natalya Dmitrievna, a young lady), the husband is a boy, the husband is a servant becomes the ideal of society, therefore, and Molchalin has good prospects to enter this category of husbands and make a career. They all strive for kinship with the rich and noble. Human qualities are not appreciated in this society. Gallomania became the true evil of noble Moscow.

Why did gossip about Chatsky's madness arise and spread? Why are Famusov's guests so willing to support this gossip?

The emergence and spread of gossip about Chatsky's madness is a very interesting dramatic series of phenomena. At first glance, gossip appears by chance. GN, having caught Sophia's mood, asks her how she found Chatsky. "He is not quite all there". What did Sophia mean, being under the impression of the just ended conversation with the hero? I hardly put a direct meaning in my words. But the interlocutor understood exactly that and asked again. And here in the head of Sophia, insulted for Molchalin, an insidious plan arises. The remarks to Sophia's further remarks are of great importance for the explanation of this scene: "after a pause, he looks at him intently, to the side." Her further remarks are already aimed at consciously introducing this thought into the head of secular gossips. She no longer doubts that the rumor will be picked up and overgrown with details.

He is ready to believe!

Ah, Chatsky! you like to play around as jesters,

Is it good to try on yourself?

The rumor of insanity is spreading with astonishing speed. A series of "little comedies" begins, when everyone puts their own meaning into this news, tries to give their own explanation. Someone speaks with hostility about Chatsky, someone sympathizes with him, but everyone believes, because his behavior and his views are inadequate to the norms accepted in this society. In these comedy scenes, the characters of the characters that make up the Famus circle are brilliantly revealed. Zagoretsky supplements the news on the go with a fictitious lie that the rogue uncle has packed Chatsky into the yellow house. The Countess-granddaughter also believes, Chatsky's judgments seemed insane to her. The dialogue about Chatsky of the Countess-grandmother and Prince Tugoukhovsky, who, due to their deafness, add a lot to the rumor started by Sophia: “the accursed Voltairean”, “transgressed the law”, “in the busters he”, etc. Then comic miniatures are replaced by a mass scene (third act, phenomenon XXI), where almost everyone recognizes Chatsky as a madman.

Explain the meaning and define the meaning of Chatsky's monologue about a Frenchman from Bordeaux.

The monologue "Frenchie from Bordeaux" is an important scene in the development of the conflict between Chatsky and Famus society. After the hero had conversations separately with Molchalin, Sophia, Famusov, his guests, in whom a sharp opposition of views was discovered, here he delivers a monologue in front of the entire society gathered at the ball in the hall. Everyone has already believed in the rumor about his madness and therefore expect from him clearly delusional speeches and strange, perhaps aggressive, actions. It is in this vein that the guests perceive Chatsky's speeches condemning the cosmopolitanism of the noble society. It is paradoxical that the hero expresses sound, patriotic thoughts ("slavish blind imitation", "smart and cheerful our people"; by the way, condemnation of Gallomania sometimes sounds in the speeches of Famusov), he is mistaken for insane and they leave him, stop listening, diligently circling in a waltz , the old people scatter on the card tables.

Which depicts the life of the country after the Patriotic War of 1812. This is a life where two camps collided. The first camp is an advanced, Decembrist outlook, a new outlook on life, on its foundations. The second camp is the nobility, or the past century, they are also the Famus society. We will talk about the ideals of Famus society in particular, considering both their moral and life ideals.

The life ideals of the Famus society

For these people, only money is important, with the help of which both ranks and orders can be obtained. These are people who are not famous for their services to the Fatherland, for them civic duty does not mean anything, the main thing is that the groom has a thicker wallet and then he will be a respected person. Famusov, talking about the ideals of a person, says so, be inferior, but if there are two thousand family souls, he is the groom. So, Skalozub was a good candidate for suitors, because he was aiming for generals, besides, he also had a golden bag. But if there is no money, if the person is poor, then the Famusian society will treat him with contempt. You can not even talk about serfs, because they are generally not considered people, calling them chumps and crowbars. Again, to be respected by the elite, you need wealth. So for example, Tatyana Yuryevna is respected, because she arranges rich balls.

The moral ideals of the Famus society

If we talk about moral ideals and views in Famus society, then here for Famusov his uncle is the ideal, whom he sets as an example to everyone. His uncle served under Catherine, but he did not receive his place at court with the help of any talents or merit. He just sacrificed the back of his head, his neck just often bowed. Worst of all, many members of this environment also receive honor and wealth. The same Skolozub is no better. According to his story, in 1813 he just sat out in hiding, and after such an outstanding feat he received a medal, and now he is awaiting the rank of general.

The ideal of Famusian society is definitely not enlightenment, because enlightenment and teaching are like a plague for them. People who are engaged in science and creativity are useless people for society. Famusov believes that education only hurts, so he would simply burn all the books. And they themselves don't even read newspapers.

Famus' entourage is also false patriots. They only talk about patriotism, but they themselves do nothing for the country. Although there are ranks, they are not deserved in the performance of military or civic duty. In their conversation, foreign words are constantly heard, they listen to French romances, they follow French fashion.

The life ideals of the Famus society

A. Griboyedov wrote his famous comedy "Woe from Wit" in the first half of the 19th century, in the midst of preparations for the December uprising. Revolutionary sentiments already prevailed in society. It seemed to be invisibly divided into the nobility that had taken shape by that time and new people, carrying progressive ideas to the masses. Griboyedov himself belonged to the second camp, so A.A. Chatsky became the main character of the work.

And he condemns the well-established worldview of wealthy officials.

One of such Moscow noble landowners was Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov, in whose house the entire elite of the city gathered. Thanks to this hero, the expression “Famus society” has existed for more than two centuries. Who are the people from the Famusov circle? All of them, without exception, come from noble families, and therefore people who are poorer are treated with contempt.

They have a very prejudiced attitude towards serfs. They are for them “parsley”, “block”, “crowbar”, etc. Famusov himself, addressing his employees, says: “Into your work! To settle you! "

These so-called Moscow nobles boast of their patriotism while doing nothing for the country. They even earned their ranks not with a brave military duty. They distort Russian names in the French manner, wear dresses according to the models of foreign fashionistas, read French books, and sing French romances.

This is precisely what Chatsky condemns in them, for whom it is unpleasant to see such false patriotism in his surroundings. Indifference to service and negative attitude to learning can also be attributed to the life ideals of Famus society. For them, people engaged in science or creativity are useless subjects for society.

As Famusov says about Chatsky's “madness”: “Learning is the plague, learning is the reason that now, more than when, crazy people, and deeds and opinions, are divorced.” And everyone readily agrees with him.

To be precise, the “past” century in the work of Griboyedov is represented by the families of the Tugoukhovsky, Gorich, Khryumin, the elderly Madame Khlestova, Skalozub, Zagoretsky and Repetilov. The Tugoukhovskys come to the Famusovs' ball to find "worthy" husbands for their daughters. Gorichi are Chatsky's longtime friends, but he perceives this couple with a slight irony, because Natalya Dmitrievna skillfully subdued her husband and made him a weak-willed person.

Countess Khryumina: grandmother and granddaughter. The latter is especially disliked by Chatsky for the caustic manner of remarks and imitation of French milliners. Madame Khlestova is a domineering and wayward old woman who has taken with her a dog and a little girl.

Skalozub, Repetilov and Zagoretsky occupy a special place in the comedy. The first one was chosen by Famusov as a husband for his daughter Sophia, as he is rude, uneducated, uncouth, but has a good material condition and occupies an “important” post. Zagoretsky is a former gambler, swindler and thief, and Repetilov is a thoughtless chatterbox, who, however, was lucky to marry the daughter of a wealthy official. With the tacit consent of these heroes, the fates of other people are decided in comedy.

Thus, all representatives of the Famusian society are united by a commonality of ideals, which include inertia, ignorance, fear of progress, fear of everything that is new.

(No Ratings Yet)

How does Molchalin reveal himself during a dialogue with Chatsky? How does he behave and what gives him the right to behave this way? Molchalin is cynical and frank with Chatsky about his views on life. He talks, from his point of view, with a loser (“You were not given the ranks, failure in the service?”), Gives advice to go to Tatyana Yurievna, is sincerely surprised by the sharp [...] ...
Mind in the understanding of Chatsky and Famus society In the work of A. Griboyedov “Woe from Wit” the central place is occupied by the problem of mind or what different people mean by it, representatives of two polar communities. The writer himself calls sensible in his work only the protagonist A. A. Chatsky - a young nobleman, not rich, but with progressive views and high [...] ...
New trends came to Russia after the victory in the war of 1812. As always with the introduction of a new ideology, there was a polarization of high society, and the government consolidated around itself conservative forces, which were called upon to fight free-thinking. It was this society, which did not want and actively resisted changes, and became the prototype of the Famus society for A.S. Griboyedov when creating [...] ...
In the comedy Woe from Wit, Griboyedov portrayed the life of Russia after the Patriotic War of 1812. Close in his views to the Decembrists, Griboyedov showed the clash of two camps in Russian public life: the advanced Decembrist and the old serfdom, the “present century” and the “past century”. Depicting the “past century”, Griboyedov brought on the stage a whole crowd of inhabitants of noble Moscow. They are rich and noble [...] ...
Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" was created in 1822-1824. It reflected the current position of the author in society. Through everyday life, Griboyedov showed not only the moral and ethical state of the Russian nobility. He painted a portrait of the social and political life of the country, split into two camps: conservatives and people of progressive views. Woe from Wit is, in fact, the first Russian realistic work. [...] ...
The comedy "Woe from Wit" gives a general picture of the entire Russian life of the 10-20s of the XIX century, reproduces the eternal struggle of the old and the new, which unfolded with great force at that time not only in Moscow, but throughout Russia, between two camps : advanced, Decembrist-minded people and serf-owners, a stronghold of antiquity. Famus society, which firmly kept the traditions of the “past century”, [...] ...
- Hello, dear radio listeners! The program “Theater and Life” is on the air, and the director of the theater named after Vakhtangov Evgeny Arbenin. We are meeting with him in connection with a significant event - the other day the premiere of the play "Woe from Wit" took place. Evgeny Vasilievich - production director. - Please tell me why exactly the work of Griboyedov? - Good afternoon, dear [...] ...
1. The history of the creation of the comedy "Woe from Wit". 2. The reason for the disagreement between the representatives of the “present century” and the “past century”. 3. The immortality of the comedy by A. S. Griboyedov. A. Griboyedov created the comedy "Woe from Wit" at the beginning of the 19th century. In those years, new trends began to come to replace the orders of Catherine's era, new people appeared in Russian society, with advanced [...] ...
A noble husband thinks about his due. The low person thinks about what is profitable. Confucius The comedy "Woe from Wit" was completed by A. Griboyedov by the fall of 1824. The work put the writer on a par with the first poets of the country. Indeed, one cannot argue with the genius of this comedy - it fully reveals the most important problems of Russia in the 19th century. [...] ...
The present century and the past century Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov's satirical comedy "Woe from Wit" was written in 1824. It was created at a time when people changed one worldview to another. The people of the “past century” continued to live according to the old established laws, and the people of the “present century” were striving for new changes. Famusov and the environment [...] were among the representatives of the “past century”.
Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov wrote the first realistic comedy in Russian literature. Some meaning is put into the title of each work. The name of the comedy "Woe from Wit" reflects the life drama of the main character - Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky. Chatsky is a very intelligent and educated person, but this does not bring him happiness. He returns to his girlfriend, but she betrayed him and already [...] ...
School based on the comedy "Woe from Wit" by A. Griboyedov. The comedy by Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov “Woe from Wit” depicts the life of society in Russia in the first two decades of the nineteenth century. Griboyedov vividly and fully showed the struggle of the old against the new, the struggle of the new generation against the old serf foundations of society. The main character representing the new generation is Alexander Andreevich Chatsky, who [...] ...
Female Images Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov's satirical comedy, Woe from Wit, was written in the first half of the nineteenth century. At this time, everyone worshiped someone else's fashion, language and culture, imitated Europe, mainly France. The society rejected doctrine, books, judged a person by wealth and the number of serfs. Moscow noblewomen are represented by Natalya Dmitrievna Gorich, Anfisa Nilovna Khlestova, Countess Tugoukhovskaya [...] ...
Is Sophia worthy of Chatsky's love The comedy “Woe from Wit”, written by A. S. Griboyedov in the first half of the 19th century, is undoubtedly a work of great social significance. The main character of the comedy, Alexander Andreevich Chatsky, is opposed to the camp of representatives of the Famus society, namely to the society of people of the "past" century. He, without fear and regret, goes alone against the Moscow bureaucratic families, openly mocking [...] ...
And who are the judges? After the Patriotic War of 1812, a period of gloomy government reaction began in Russia. Society has split into representatives of the "past" century and into people with new aspirations for the future. The former include the so-called “Famus society” from the work of Griboyedov “Woe from Wit”, and the latter of Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky, an intelligent man who managed to oppose [...] ...
The Problem of the Mind in Comedy About his work "Woe from Wit" AS Griboyedov wrote: "In my comedy there are 25 fools for one sane person." This expression alone characterizes the meaning of the book. We understand that we will be talking about the eternal problem of mind and stupidity. For its time, it was a cutting edge comedy promoting a new movement. The main character in his own [...] ...
Conflict of two eras Reading the comedy of A.S. Griboyedov, we become witnesses of the collision of two eras, which actually took place in Russia at the beginning of the 19th century. This is a conflict between the “present century” and the “past century”. It cannot be said that this topic has lost its relevance. After all, the conflict between generations has been and will always be. However, Griboyedov showed it from the point of view of an advanced [...] ...
In the comedy "Woe from Wit" by A. Griboyedov, a magnificent generalized image of the lordly Moscow of the early 19th century is created. From the first pages, the author introduces us to the life of a noble family, acquaints us with the customs of the noble society, reveals the relationship of the characters. The first scenes in Famusov's house introduce us to some characters (Famusov, Sophia, Molchalin, Liza) and prepare the appearance of others (Skalozub, [...] ...
For what and against what Chatsky is fighting Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov wrote the comedy “Woe from Wit” after the Patriotic War of 1812 and shortly before the December uprising in the country. Thus, the work fully conveys the mood that was in the air at that time. Society has actually split into two opposition camps. The first group included the people of the “past century” - [...] ...
Funny or scary Molchalin The appearance at the beginning of the 19th century of Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" opened a new milestone in the history of Russian literature. All characters created by the writer have not only literary, but also social significance. The heroes of the comedy are divided into two camps: "the past century" and "the present century", but there are those who have nowhere to be attributed. For example, Alexey Stepanych Molchalin, [...] ...
Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov is one of the main characters in the comedy by A. S. Griboyedov “Woe from Wit”. Famusov is a Moscow gentleman, Sophia's father and an old friend of Chatsky's father. It is in his house that the events of the play unfold. Pavel Afanasyevich is a widower, he loves his daughter very much, takes care of her upbringing and is looking for a worthy groom for Sophia. Do [...] ...
Does a book help a person to better understand himself “Reading is the best teaching” - said Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin. Literature helps a person to learn something new, interesting, broaden his horizons, solve some of his problems, and most importantly, to know himself. The books that have come down to us from distant times are a reflection of the entire life experience of past generations. Many of them […]...
What is Sophia's fault and trouble In the comedy of A. S. Griboyedov, new Moscow nobles of the 19th century are presented, for whom only a high position in society and the presence of significant ranks are valuable. The author skillfully shows the conflict between the landowners-serfs with the young, positive-minded generation. This is a clash of two camps: the "past" century and the "present" century. Defending their mercantile interests and personal [...] ...
Letter to Sofya Dear Sofya Pavlovna, I am writing this letter in response to your previous letters with a story about the current situation in your home. I thought for a long time how to help you and what to advise. Alas, it seems to me that the person with whom you are now in love is unworthy of you and pursues only his own goals, although I may be wrong. I know, […]...
Famusov is one of the main characters in Griboyedov's great creation Woe from Wit. This is a very bright and memorable hero, so I cannot but describe his image and character. Full name - Pavel Afanasevich Famusov. He is a very rich man who is a manager in a government institution. He always uses his high position both in society and [...] ...
Chatsky and the Famus Society The satirical comedy by Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov describes a noble society of 10-20 years of the XIX century. The main character of the work, Alexander Andreevich Chatsky, is a young, noble, honest and free-thinking man. In the comedy, he is opposed not only to individual characters, but also to the entire Famus society, which lived according to the traditions of the “past century”. Famusov, in whose house events unfolded, [...] ...
There are several conflicts in the play “Woe from Wit”, while the necessary condition for a classic play was the presence of only one conflict. Woe from Wit is a comedy with two storylines, and at first glance it seems that the play has two conflicts: love (between Chatsky and Sophia) and public (between Chatsky and Famus' society). The play begins with a love conflict [...] ...
The entire action of the drama takes place in Moscow in the Famusov house, where our character actually lives. The author does not give a complete description of his appearance, but from small phrases we can understand that Famusov is an elderly man, obese, loud-voiced, with hair gray as ashes “... [...] ...
Chatsky Alexander Andreevich is the main character of Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit". Returning to his homeland, to the house of Famusov, where he once met his first love, he hopefully tries to return the feelings of Sophia, who by that time no longer loved him. Having met on his way lies, deceit, hypocrisy, ignorance, he furiously begins to express his opinion about [...] ...
1. Moscow "light" values \u200b\u200bits nobility, reliably protects serf ideals. Griboyedov emphasizes the cruelty of the landowners towards the serfs. “Aliens” - Molchalin, Zagoretskiy - must be hypocritical, please, pretend. 2. Representatives of Famusovskaya Moscow regard the service as a means of “getting ranks”, “taking awards and having fun”. 3. The main human value in the Moscow world is the "golden bag", and [...] ...
The main characters of the comedy "Woe from Wit" are Chatsky and Famusov. A.S. Griboyedov shows the clash of Chatsky's mind and the stupidity of Famus society. Famus society is characterized by deceit, stupidity, ignorance and unwillingness to overcome their shortcomings. This is proved by many episodes of the comedy. The main ideologist Famusov says: Tell me that it is not good for her to spoil her eyes And it’s not very useful in reading: She [...] ...
The heroine of Griboyedov's play "Woe from Wit" Sophia is presented in the work rather ambiguously. Her image is indeed contradictory. What is this contradiction? On the one hand, she was greatly influenced by the environment in which her ideals were formed. She was brought up by the Famus society and in many ways learned the rules of life and behavior of this world. One of these ideals is “husband-boy, [...] ...
The main theme of the play "Woe from Wit" is the conflict of a strong personality with the philistine views of the surrounding society. This is most clearly illustrated by the example of the Famus house. Chatsky came to the silence of this house with his stormy and sincere feelings. He turned out to be an uninvited guest in a society where everything is built on pretense and lies. Sophia hides her love for Molchalin, father [...] ...
In what ways do the views on the life of Chatsky and the "Famus society" differ? Describe the social and moral ideals of the various heroes. The blatant immorality of the opportunistic bureaucrat Molchalin, the lack of spirituality of the "silovik" Skalozub - all this is a Russian reality, which the official, military man and thinker Griboyedov knew from within. He also knew the "imported" romantic ideas with which Chatsky, who had returned from abroad, was overwhelmed. The writer gives them their due, shows them [...] ...
In his monologue, Chatsky touches on many issues of society in the 19th century. At the beginning of the monologue, Chatsky speaks of the old judgments, that the worldview of people still has not changed "since the time of the Ochakovskys and the conquest of the Crimea." Further, he points to the wrong moral values \u200b\u200bof "Famus society", saying that the rich make themselves wealth by theft and shut their mouths to all those [...] ...
A.S. Griboyedov does not accidentally select his surname for Famusov. In Latin, "fama" sounds like "rumor", and "famosus" in Latin means "famous". Knowing this, every reader understands from the very first lines of the work that we are talking about an important person holding a high position in society. The titled landowner, a wealthy gentleman, related to the eminent nobleman Maxim Petrovich, Pavel [...] ...
The characters of Chatsky and Molchalin are opposed to each other. Chatsky is undoubtedly the main character of the comedy, because it is with his appearance that events in Famusov's house begin to develop. Chatsky is not a wealthy person by origin, but this is not the main thing for him. Others say well about him: "Who is so sensitive and cheerful and sharp ...". Previously, he served as an official, but left the service, [...] ...
Chatsky comes to Moscow, hoping for great changes in society, and the remaining former Sophia. But he finds himself in a completely different situation. Sophia turned everything past into laughter, but in the city everything remained unchanged. Chatsky does not immediately notice the change that has occurred with Sophia. For her sake, after so many years, he came to Moscow, which has never seduced him, [...] ...
The comedy "Woe from Wit" by Griboyedov was initially frivolous, comedic in nature. But at the end of the work, it becomes clear that it is dramatic and carries a deep meaning. The expression “woe from wits” sounds somewhat paradoxical, because what grief can there be from the fact that a person is smart and educated? But it turns out that it can! And Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov is excellent [...] ...
Griboyedov wrote his comedy for several years. The author tirelessly monitored the trends in the development of society and its aspirations. The result of these observations was the writing of the brilliant creation "Woe from Wit", reflecting the interaction and contradiction of representatives of such worlds as the henchmen of feudalism and the progressive nobility. The defenders of serfdom cannot come to terms with the fact that the time of slavery has sunk [...] ...

Essay on the topic: The life ideals of the Famus society in the comedy Woe from Wit Griboyedov

Griboyedov, Woe from Wit. What are the moral and life ideals of the Famus society?

The life ideals of the Famus society

The moral ideals of the Famus society

Chatsky's ideals (based on the comedy "Woe from Wit")

The life ideals of the Famus society

The moral ideals of the Famus society

Related posts: