Comparative characteristics of Oblomov and Stolz love. Comparative characteristics of the images of the main characters of Ivan Goncharov's novel "Oblomov". Composition of Oblomov and Stolz

In the novel Oblomov, Alexander Goncharov touches on the theme of friendship between people who are completely different in character and views.

Comparative characteristics of the image of Oblomov and Stolz will help the reader to understand whether she is capable of changing a person for the better.

Childhood and upbringing

Ilya Ilyich Oblomov grew up as a spoiled child. Parents took care of their son too much, did not give him the opportunity to prove himself. I didn’t like to study. He believed that science was sent to people as a punishment for sins. As a thirteen-year-old boy, he was enrolled in a boarding house. I often asked my mother for permission to stay at home, not to go to study. I didn't get enough knowledge at the university because of my own laziness.

Andrey Ivanovich Stolts was a smart boy. I absorbed knowledge like a sponge. His father raised him in severity. The mother did not encourage "labor education." When the father sent his son to the university, he did not take him to the city. He said goodbye at the gate without unnecessary emotions, put on his cap, and pushed him so hard that he knocked him off his feet.

Appearance

Ilya is overweight. His "plump arms and soft shoulders" gave the appearance a certain delicacy. "His complexion was not rosy or swarthy, he seemed positively pale." There were always some thoughts in the gray eyes, which quickly disappeared before they had time to sit in my head.

Andrei thin, he has no cheeks at all, his skin is dark. "It was made of bones, nerves and muscles, like an English horse." His face bore expressive green eyes. From him comes masculinity and health.

Aspirations and wealth

Ilya Oblomov in his thirty-two years, he has made absolutely nothing on his own. He left the service because of a stupid mistake, sending important documents to the wrong address. He was unable to complete a simple assignment. He lives in a rented apartment. The estate inherited from the parents suffers losses, does not bring the proper wealth. Ilya Ilyich knows nothing about financial matters.

Doesn't try to keep up and create something in life. Lies on the couch, constantly drowsy.

Stolz “I served, retired, took up my own business and made a house and money. He is involved in some company that sends goods abroad. " Does not allow mistakes in work. He achieved respect in society and material wealth through his own efforts. “It is incessantly on the move: if a society needs to send an agent to England or Belgium, they send him. Should you create a new project or disassemble a new idea - they choose Stolz. "

Love for a woman

Andrei respects the opposite sex. In relations with Olga Ilyinskaya, he shows himself to be a true gentleman, able to solve all the worries of his beloved, to please her. He achieved his goal - he married the one he loves.

Ilya always tactful in dealing with women. He loved Olga Ilyinskaya, but could not overcome laziness and reluctance to change. He was afraid of the routine of marriage. He gave his beloved a lot of trouble, she often cried because of his caustic speeches. He married the widow Pshenitsyna, from whom he rented a room. She asked absolutely nothing of him. Such a relationship suited Oblomov.

Attitude to life

Andrey Stoltsfull of health, wishes to live for many more years. Although he is a realist, phrases are often heard from his lips that he wants to "live for two or three hundred years." Adheres to the goal that everything should be carried out on the basis of clearly set tasks. The dream had no place in his soul.

Ilya Oblomov calls himself an "old caftan". Sometimes she voices thoughts that I would go to bed and fall asleep forever. Loves to dream. His imagination often draws fictional pictures. Especially clearly highlights the images of the future wife and children.

Goncharov's novel Oblomov was highly praised by critics of the second half of the 19th century. In particular, Belinsky noted that the work fell on time and reflected the socio-political thought of the 50-60s of the nineteenth century. Two lifestyles - Oblomov and Stolz - are compared in this article.

Oblomov's characteristic

Ilya Ilyich was distinguished by his desire for peace, inaction. Oblomov cannot be called interesting and varied: he is used to spending most of the day in thought, lying on the couch. Plunging into these thoughts, he often did not get up from his bed, did not go out into the street, did not learn the latest news throughout the day. He did not read newspapers on principle, so as not to bother himself with unnecessary, and most importantly, meaningless information. Oblomov can be called a philosopher, he is worried about other issues: not everyday, not momentary, but eternal, spiritual. He seeks meaning in everything.

When you look at him, you get the impression that he is a happy free-thinker, not burdened with the hardships and problems of external life. But life "touches, gets everywhere" Ilya Ilyich, makes him suffer. Dreams remain only dreams, because he does not know how to translate them into real life. Even reading tires him: Oblomov has a lot of started books, but they all remain unread, not understood. The soul seems to be asleep in him: he avoids unnecessary worries, worries, worries. In addition, Oblomov often compares his calm, secluded existence with the life of other people and finds that the way others live is not good for living: "When should we live?"

This is what Oblomov's ambiguous image is. "Oblomov" (Goncharov I.A.) was created in order to outline the personality of this character - uncommon and extraordinary in its own way. Impulses and deep emotional experiences are not alien to him. Oblomov is a true dreamer with a poetic, sensitive nature.

Stolz characteristic

Oblomov's lifestyle cannot be compared with Stolz's worldview. The reader first meets this character in the second part of the work. Andrei Stolz loves order in everything: his day is scheduled by the hour and minute, dozens of important things are planned that need to be urgently redone. Today he is in Russia, tomorrow, you see, he has unexpectedly left abroad. What Oblomov finds boring and meaningless is important and significant for him: trips to cities, villages, intentions to improve the quality of life of those around him.

He opens in his soul such treasures that Oblomov cannot even guess about. Stolz's way of life consists entirely of activities that feed his whole being with the energy of vigor. In addition, Stolz is a good friend: more than once he helped Ilya Ilyich in business matters. The lifestyle of Oblomov and Stolz is different from each other.

What is Oblomovism?

As a social phenomenon, the concept denotes a focus on the idle, monotonous, devoid of color and any changes in life. Andrei Stolts called Oblomov's lifestyle itself, Oblomov's striving for endless peace and lack of any activity. Despite the fact that a friend constantly pushed Oblomov to the possibility of changing the way of existence, he did not budge at all, as if he did not have enough energy to do it. At the same time, we see that Oblomov admits his mistake, saying the following words: "I have long been ashamed to live in the world." He feels useless, unnecessary and abandoned, and therefore he does not want to dust off the table, disassemble the books that have been lying for a month, leave the apartment once again.

Love in the understanding of Oblomov

Oblomov's lifestyle did not in any way contribute to the acquisition of real, and not fictional, happiness. He dreamed and made plans more than he really lived. Amazingly, in his life there was a place for quiet rest, philosophical reflections on the essence of life, but there was not enough strength for decisive action and implementation of intentions. Love for Olga Ilyinskaya temporarily pulls Oblomov out of his usual existence, makes him try new things, start taking care of himself. He even forgets old habits and sleeps only at night, and does business during the day. But still, love in Oblomov's worldview is directly related to dreams, thoughts and poetry.

Oblomov considers himself unworthy of love: he doubts whether Olga can love him, whether he suits her enough, whether he is able to make her happiness. Such thoughts lead him to sad thoughts about his useless life.

Love as understood by Stolz

Stolz approaches the question of love more rationally. He does not indulge in ephemeral dreams in vain, as he looks at life soberly, without imagination, without the habit of analyzing. Stolz is a business man. He does not need romantic walks in the moonlight, loud declarations of love and sighs on the bench, because he is not Oblomov. Stolz's lifestyle is very dynamic and pragmatic: he makes an offer to Olga at the moment when he realizes that she is ready to accept him.

What did Oblomov come to?

As a result of protective and careful behavior, Oblomov misses the opportunity to build a close relationship with Olga Ilyinskaya. His marriage was upset shortly before the wedding - it took too long to get ready, to explain, to ask himself, to compare, to figure out, to analyze Oblomov. The characterization of the image of Oblomov Ilya Ilyich teaches not to repeat the mistakes of an idle, aimless existence, raises the question of what is love really? Is she the subject of lofty, poetic aspirations, or is it the calm joy, peace that Oblomov finds in the house of the widow Agafya Pshenitsyna?

Why did Oblomov's physical death come?

The result of Ilya Ilyich's philosophical reflections is as follows: he chose to bury in himself former aspirations and even lofty dreams. with Olga, his life focused on everyday life. He knew no greater joy than a delicious meal and an afternoon nap. Gradually, the engine of his life began to stop, subside: ailments and cases became more frequent.Even previous thoughts left him: there was no longer a place for them in a quiet room that looked like a coffin, in all this sluggish life that lulled Oblomov, more and more distanced him from reality. Mentally, this man had long been dead. Physical death was only a confirmation of the falsity of his ideals.

Stolz's achievements

Stolz, unlike Oblomov, did not miss his chance to become happy: he built family prosperity with Olga Ilyinskaya. This marriage was accomplished out of love, in which Stolz did not fly into the clouds, did not stay in destructive illusions, but acted more than reasonably and responsibly.

The lifestyles of Oblomov and Stolz are diametrically opposed and opposed to each other. Both characters are unique, inimitable and significant in their own way. This may explain the strength of their friendship over the years.

Each of us is close to either the Stoltz or Oblomov type. There is nothing wrong with that, and the coincidences are likely to be only partial. Those who are deep, loving to reflect on the essence of life, most likely, will understand Oblomov's experiences, his restless mental rushes and searches. Business pragmatists, who left romance and poetry far behind, will embody themselves with Stolz.

The characters of the main characters in Goncharov's novel Oblomov are depicted exceptionally true and talented by the author. If the artist's task is to snatch and capture the essence of life, inaccessible to the understanding of the layman, then the great Russian writer coped with it brilliantly. Its main character, for example, personifies a whole social phenomenon named in his honor "Oblomovism". No less noteworthy is the phenomenal friendship between Oblomov and Stolz, two antipodes, who, it would seem, should have irreconcilably argued with each other or even despised each other, as is often the case in communication between completely different people. However, Goncharov goes against stereotypes, tying the antagonists with a strong friendship. Throughout the novel, observing the relationship between Oblomov and Stolz is not only necessary, but also interesting for the reader. The clash of two life positions, two worldviews is the main conflict in Goncharov's novel Oblomov.

Differences between Oblomov and Stolz are easy to find. First, the appearance catches the eye: Ilya Ilyich is a burly gentleman with soft features, plump hands, and slow gestures. His favorite clothing is a spacious robe, which does not restrict movement, as it were, protects and warms a person. Stolz is fit and slender. Constant activity and business acumen characterize his practical nature, so his gestures are bold, and his reaction is quick. He is always dressed appropriately to spin in the light and make the right impression.

Secondly, they have different upbringing. If little Ilyusha was cared for and cherished by parents, nannies and other inhabitants of Oblomovka (he grew up a pampered boy), then Andrei was brought up in severity, his father taught him how to conduct business, leaving him to make his own way. Stolz, in the end, did not have enough parental affection, which he was looking for in his friend's house. Oblomov, on the contrary, was too kind, his parents pampered him: he is not fit either for the service or for the landowner's work (taking care of the estate and its profitability).

Thirdly, their attitude to life differs. Ilya Ilyich does not like fuss, does not spend efforts to please society, or at least to wedge himself into it. Many condemn him for laziness, but is it laziness? I think not: he is a nonconformist who is honest to himself and to the people around him. A nonconformist is a person who defends his right to behave differently from what is customary in his contemporary society. Oblomov had the courage and resilience to silently, calmly adhere to his position and go his own way, not exchanging for trifles. In his demeanor of self-conduct, a rich spiritual life is guessed, which he does not expose to the social showcase. Stolz lives in this window, because fiddling in a good society always benefits the businessman. We can say that Andrei had no other choice, because he is not a master, his father earned capital, but no one will leave villages to him by inheritance. He was taught from childhood that he himself must earn his living, so Stolz adapted to the circumstances, developing hereditary qualities: perseverance, hard work, social activity. But if he is so successful by modern standards, why does Stolz need Oblomov? From his father, he inherited an obsession with affairs, the limitations of a practical person, which he felt, and therefore subconsciously reached for the spiritually rich Oblomov.

They were drawn to the opposite, feeling the lack of certain properties of nature, but they could not adopt good qualities from each other. None of them could make Olga Ilyinskaya happy: with one and the other, she felt dissatisfaction. Unfortunately, this is the truth of life: people rarely change in the name of love. Oblomov tried, but still remained true to his principles. Stolz was also only enough for courtship, and after that the routine of common life began. Thus, in love, the similarities between Oblomov and Stolz were manifested: they both failed to build happiness.

In these two images, Goncharov reflected the contradictory trends in the society of that time. The nobility is the backbone of the state, but its individual representatives cannot take an active part in its fate, if only because it was trivial and petty for them. They are gradually replaced by people who have gone through a harsh school of life, more skillful and greedy Stolz. They do not have the spiritual component that is needed for any useful work in Russia. But apathetic landlords will not save the day either. Apparently, the author believed that the merger of these extremes, a kind of golden mean, is the only way to achieve the well-being of Russia. If we consider the novel from this angle, it turns out that the friendship between Oblomov and Stolz is a symbol of the unification of different social forces for a common goal.

Interesting? Keep it on your wall!

The novel "Oblomov" is one of the iconic works of the 19th century, covering many social and philosophical themes. An important role in revealing the ideological meaning of the work is played by the analysis of the relationship in the book of the two main male characters. In the novel "Oblomov", the characterization of Oblomov and Stolz reflects their completely different natures, opposed by the author.
According to the plot of the work, the heroes are best friends from an early age, helping each other, if possible, even in adulthood: Stolz Oblomov - by solving many of his pressing problems, and Ilya Ilyich to Andrei Ivanovich - with pleasant conversations that allow Stolz to return peace of mind.

Portrait characteristics of heroes

Comparative characteristics of Oblomov and Stolz in Goncharov's novel Oblomov are given by the author himself and is most remarkable when comparing their portrait characteristics, as well as characters. Ilya Ilyich is a soft, quiet, kind, dreamy, reflective goof who makes any decision at the behest of his heart, even if his mind leads the hero to the opposite conclusions. The appearance of the introverted Oblomov fully corresponds to his character - his movements are soft, lazy, round, and the image is characterized by excessive effeminacy, not typical for a man.

Stolz, both internally and externally, is completely different from Oblomov. The main thing in the life of Andrei Ivanovich is the rational kernel, in all matters he relies only on reason, while the dictates of the heart, intuition and the sphere of feelings for the hero are not only something secondary, but are also inaccessible, incomprehensible to his rational reflections. Unlike Oblomov, "flabby beyond his years", Stolz seems to consist of "bones, muscles and nerves." His life is a rapid race forward, an important attribute of which is the constant self-development of the individual and continuous work. The images of Oblomov and Stolz seem to be a mirror image of each other: active, extroverted, successful in society and in the career field, Stolz is contrasted with the lazy, apathetic, unwilling to communicate with anyone, let alone re-enter the service, Oblomov.

Differences in raising heroes

When comparing Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolz, as well as for a better understanding of the characters' images, it is important to briefly describe the atmosphere in which each of the characters grew up. Despite the "addictive", as if covering with a veil of half-sleep and laziness, Oblomovka's environment little Ilya was a cheerful, active and curious child, which at first is very similar to Stolz. He wanted to learn as much as possible about the world around him, but the excessive care of his parents, the "hothouse" upbringing, the inculcation of obsolete, obsolete and aimed at the ideals of the past, made the child a worthy successor of the traditions of "Oblomovism", the bearer of the "Oblomov" worldview - introverted, living in his own illusory world.

However, Stolz also did not grow the way he could have grown. At first glance, the combination in his upbringing of the strict approach of a German father and the tenderness of a noble mother of Russian origin would allow Andrei to become a harmonious, comprehensively developed personality. Nevertheless, as the author points out, Stolz grew "a cactus accustomed to drought." The young man lacked love, warmth and gentleness, since he was mainly raised by his father, who did not believe that a man needed to be instilled in sensitivity. However, Stolz's Russian roots until the end of his life were looking for this warmth, finding it in Oblomov, and then in the idea of \u200b\u200bOblomovka, which he denied.

Education and career of heroes

The inconsistency of the characters of Stolz and Oblomov manifests itself already in his youth, when Andrei Ivanovich, trying to learn as much as possible about the world around him, tried to instill in Ilya Ilyich a love of books, ignite a flame in him that would make him strive forward. And Stolz succeeded, but for a very short time - as soon as Oblomov remained on his own, the book for him became less important than, for example, a dream. Somehow, more likely for his parents, Ilya Ilyich graduates from high school, and then from university, where he was absolutely not interested, since the hero did not understand how mathematics and other sciences could be useful to him in life. Even a single failure in the service was the end of his career for him - it was too hard for the sensitive, soft Oblomov to rebuild under the strict rules of the capital world, far from the norms of life in Oblomovka.

Stolz, on the other hand, with his rational, active outlook on the world, is much easier to move up the career ladder, because any failure was more likely another incentive for him than a defeat. Andrei Ivanovich's continuous work, high efficiency, ability to please others made him a useful person at any workplace and a pleasant guest in any society, and all thanks to the purposefulness laid down by his father and the continuous thirst for knowledge that his parents developed in Stolz as a child.

Characteristics of Oblomov and Stolz as carriers of two opposite principles

In the critical literature, when comparing Oblomov and Stolz, it is widely believed that the characters are two opposites, two types of “superfluous” heroes who, in their “pure” form, cannot be found in real life, even though Oblomov is a realistic novel , and, therefore, the described images must be typical images. However, when analyzing the upbringing and formation of each of the characters, the reasons for Oblomov's apathy, laziness and dreaminess become clear, as well as excessive dryness, rationality, even a similarity with a certain Stolz mechanism.

Comparison of Stolz and Oblomov makes it possible to understand that both heroes are personalities not only typical of their time, but also tendentious images for any time. Oblomov is a typical son of wealthy parents, brought up in an atmosphere of love and heightened care, protected by his family from the need to work, decide something and actively act, because there will always be "Zakhar" who will do everything for him. Stolz, on the other hand, is a person who is taught from an early age to the need to work and work, while being deprived of love and care, which leads to a certain inner callousness of such a person, to a misunderstanding of the nature of feelings and emotional deprivation.

Product test