Appendix 1

Oblomov

Volkov

Sudbinsky

Penkin

Stolz

Olga

Insignificant connections

Significant connections

Preview:

Appendix 2

Worksheet # 1

Criterion	Oblomov		Stolz
Appearance (when presented to the reader)	"... about thirty-two three years of age, medium height, pleasant appearance, with dark gray eyes, but with the absence of any definite idea ... an even light of carelessness glimmered all over his face "		the same age as Oblomov, "thin, he has almost no cheeks at all, ... the complexion is even, swarthy and no blush; although a little greenish but expressive "
Origin	from a wealthy noble family with patriarchal traditions. His parents, like grandfathers, did nothing: serfs worked for them		a native of the bourgeois class (his father left Germany, wandered around Switzerland and settled in Russia, becoming the manager of the estate). Sh. Graduated brilliantly from university, served with success, and retired to pursue his own business; makes a house and money. He is a member of a trading company that sends goods overseas; as an agent of the company, Sh. travels to Belgium, England, throughout Russia. The image of Sh. Is built on the basis of the idea of \u200b\u200bbalance, the harmonious correspondence of the physical and spiritual, reason and feeling, suffering and pleasure. The ideal of Sh. Is measure and harmony in work, life, rest, love. (or ... from a poor family: his father (Russified German) was the manager of a rich estate, his mother was an impoverished Russian noblewoman
Upbringing	Parents wanted to present Ilya with all the blessings “somehow cheaper, with different tricks.” Parents taught him to be idle and calm (they did not allow him to pick up the dropped thing, dress, pour himself water), labor in breaking was a punishment, it was believed that he was the stigma of slavery.the family had a cult of food, and after eating - a deep sleep		his father gave him the upbringing that he received from his father: he taught him all the practical sciences, forced him to work early, and sent his son, who had graduated from the university, away from him. his father taught him that the main thing in life is money, strictness and accuracy
	Oblomov didn't even let out into the street. "And what are the servants for?" Ilya soon realized that it was calmer and more convenient to give orders. A dexterous, agile child is constantly stopped by his parents and a nanny for fear that the boy will "fall, hurt himself" or catch a cold, he was cherished like a greenhouse flower. "Seekers of manifestations of power turned inward and nickle, fading."		"Breaking away from the pointer, he ran to destroy the birds nests with boys ",
Education	studied in a small boarding house, located five miles from Oblomovka, in the village of Verkhlev. Both graduated from Moscow University
			From the age of eight, he sat with his father at a geographical map, sorted out biblical verses in the warehouses of Herder, Wieland and summed up the illiterate accounts of peasants, burghers and factory workers, and with his mother he read sacred history, taught Krylov's fables and sorted out Telemac's warehouses
Pledged program	Dream. Prosperity and sleep - the passive beginning found consolation in his favorite "conciliatory and soothing" words "maybe", "maybe" and "somehow" and protected himself with them from misfortunes. He was ready to shift the matter onto anyone, not caring about his outcome and the decency of the chosen person (this is how he trusted the swindlers who robbed his estate)		Stolz was afraid to dream, his happiness was constant, energy and vigorous activity are an active principle
Activity	"Lying down for Ilya Ilyich was not a necessity, like a sick person or a person who wants to sleep, nor an accident, like someone who is tired, nor pleasure, like a lazy person: this was his normal state"		"He is incessantly on the move: society needs to send an agent to Belgium or England - they send him; you need to write some project or adapt a new idea to the case - they choose him. Meanwhile, he travels to the light and reads."
Outlook on life	"Life: life is good!" - says Oblomov, - "What is there to look for? The interests of the mind, the heart? Look where the center around which all this revolves: there is no him, there is nothing deep that touches the living. All these are dead, sleeping people, worse than me, these members of the world and society! ... Do they not sleep sitting all their lives? How am I more guilty than they are, lying at home and not infecting their heads with threes and jacks? "		Stolz learns life, asks her: "What to do? Where to go next?" And it goes! Without Oblomov ...
	the kind, lazy one worries most about his own peace. happiness for him is complete peace and good food. he spends his life on the couch without taking off his comfortable robe. does nothing, is not interested in anything, loves to withdraw into himself and live in the world of dreams and dreams he created, the amazing childish purity of his soul and introspection, worthy of a philosopher the embodiment of gentleness and meekness		strong and intelligent, he is in constant activity and does not shy away from the dirtiest work. Thanks to his hard work, willpower, patience and enterprise, he became a rich and famous person. a real "iron" character was formed. But in some ways he resembles a machine, a robot, a dryish rationalist
Love test	“Life is poetry. People are free to distort it! " Frightened that he was not worthy of love. He needs not equal love, but maternal love (the kind that Agafya Pshenitsyna gave him)		he needs a woman of equal views and strength (Olga Ilyinskaya). I am glad that I met her abroad, glad that she listens to him and does not even notice that sometimes she does not understand Olga's sadness
	"Two faces" Oblomov
	Honesty, conscientiousness, kind-heartedness, meekness, striving for ideals, dreaminess, "heart of gold"	Infantilism, lack of will, inability to act, apathy, slowness, "Russian laziness"

Preview:

Appendix 3
Worksheet # 2
criteria	education	the purpose of life	activities	attitude to a woman	family a life	vital position
Oblomov.	"I am a master, and I don't know how to do anything." Oblomovka is the ideal of life. Love and affection of relatives.	"the poetic ideal of life;" the goal was - "all life is thought and labor"; Now: "What is my goal? There is none." There is no lofty goal.	Drawing up a plan for the reconstruction of the estate; "volcanic work of an ardent head"; "not used to the movement."	"was not their slave, worshiped from afar ";" recognized her power and rights "; mother woman and never a mistress.	wife, children, good friends sit down, chores are in dreams; "he has nowhere else to go, nothing to look for, the ideal of his life has come true, although without poetry "- life with Pshenitsyna.	"... the soul is not torn, the mind sleeps peacefully."
Stolz.	"labor, practical education"; "there is no one to bless"; possibility Determine your own way of life.	"work is the goal of life"; stolz's life with oblomov's point of view: "daily empty shuffle days. " There is no lofty goal.	"He has no unnecessary movements it was ";" I was going to sit on Oblomov's wide sofa and take away and calm down an anxious or tired soul ... "empty vanity, in the end -" as if I lived a second time. "	"Life itself and work is the goal of life, not a woman"; "he doesn't like bodies of impetuous passion, as Oblomov did not want it ";" he dreamed of a creator mother ";" was not a slave, did not experience fiery joys. "	"silence has come, the impulses also subsided "; "everything as dreamed and Oblomov. "	"we are not titans ... we will not go to daring struggle with rebellious questions, we will not accept their challenge, we bow our heads and we will humbly survive the difficult moment. "
Output.	Antipode.	Double.	Double in pain Shey degree.	Double.	Double.	Double.
Answer to problematic issue.	"Stolz at the high stage of his active life turned out to be the same Oblomov ..." (Ya.I. Kuleshov.)

Preview:

Research lesson summary

"Oblomov and Stolz (based on the novel by I.A. Goncharov" Oblomov ")"

(2 hours)

Objectives:

1. Educational: check and evaluate homework; analyze the image of Oblomov; analyze the image of Stolz; select criteria for character matching; draw conclusions and formulate them in a small written work.

2. Developing: develop the skill of working with artistic text; develop the skill of analyzing the character of a work of art; improve the skill of pair and independent work; improve the logical and creative thinking of students; create a psychologically comfortable environment in the lesson.

3. Educational: continue to instill a sense of respect for 19th century Russian literature; foster a respectful attitude towards the creative heritage of Russian literature; develop the ability to listen and hear each other.

Form of work: research lesson, conversation, analysis of literary text.

Teaching methods: euretic, explanatory and illustrative.

Lesson type: combined.

Literary concepts: main character, character, portrait, speech, interior, comparative characteristics.

Interdisciplinary connections: history, music.

Equipment: portrait of I.A. Goncharova, illustrations for the novel "Oblomov", projector, screen, handouts, presentation in MS.ppt format.

During the classes:

1. Greetings. Goal setting.

Teacher's word: Our today's lesson will be devoted to two characters in the novel by I.A. Goncharov "Oblomov" is Ilya Ilyich himself and his childhood friend Andrei Stolts. Let's think together and decide what we need to explore in today's lesson. After all, it is declared as a lesson-study.

Student responses: We must analyze the images of Oblomov and Stolz, choose criteria for comparing them, and draw a conclusion.

Teacher's word: Well done! In addition, at the end of our lesson, we will write down the resulting conclusions and try to supplement them ourselves as part of a little independent work.

2. Motivation.

Teacher's word: One of the characteristics of a literary hero is his relationship with other characters, which helps in many ways to understand this hero. We have already dealt with the characterization of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov in previous lessons, casually touching on the image of another character - Andrei Stolts. To continue working on compiling the characteristics of Oblomov, you and I must correlate the names of the characters in the novel with the philosophical concepts of "relationship", "essential connections", "insignificant ties." (Appendix 1. ) To do this, first remember what these concepts mean.

Student responses:Interrelation - the interconnection of objects, phenomena, etc. with each other, their dependence on each other.

Essential ties are those ties that are most significant in a relationship between someone or something.

Insignificant connections are those connections that do not play any role in revealing the character of a character.

Teacher's word: Next, you will need to determine what connections between the characters in the novel by I.A. Goncharov's "Oblomov" will be significant and which will not. In our notebooks we draw a diagram. The work is a pair. When answering, you will need to substantiate your opinion.

(The students work with the scheme, as a result, they come to the conclusion that among the characters presented, only Olga and Andrei have a significant connection with Oblomov, since it was Ilyinskaya and Stolz who could change Oblomov's lifestyle.)

Teacher's word: Do you think Oblomov himself is ready to change his life? Prove with text.

Student response: Yes, since the text contains a quote: "Give me your will and mind and lead me wherever you want. Maybe I'll follow you ..."

Teacher's word: In the lesson, we must analyze the relationship between Oblomov and Stolz. Let's formulate the problematic questions of the lesson.

Student responses : 1) Why did Andrei Stolz fail to change the lifestyle of Ilya Oblomov?

2) Andrey Stolz - the antipode or the double of Ilya Oblomov?

If the students formulate only the first (problematic) question, the teacher helps with the formulation of the second question: this research question is more specific and helps to answer the problematic question of the lesson. Students write down the topic and questions of the lesson in a notebook.

3. Learning new material. Study. Working in groups.

Teacher's word: To answer the question "Is Andrei Stolts an antipode or a double of Ilya Oblomov?" we need to formulate the criteria by which we will compare or contrast the characters, and give the meaning of the words "antipode" and "double". Let's start by defining terms. (Implementation of homework.)

Students' word: Antipodes - (Greek antipodes - facing feet to feet). 1. only plural. Inhabitants of two opposite points of the earth, two opposite ends of one of the diameters of the globe (geogr.). 2. to someone or someone to something. A person of opposite properties, tastes or beliefs (book). He is his perfect antipode or he is his perfect antipode.

A double is a person who has complete resemblance to another (both about a man and a woman).

Teacher's word: Well thank you. Now let us turn to the criteria by which the writer Stolz and Oblomov is characterized, which you were able to identify while reading the text.

Student responses: Appearance (when they appeared before the reader), origin, upbringing, education, the program laid down, outlook on life, the author's characteristics, the test of love.

Teacher's word: It is by these criteria that we will characterize and compare the characters. Plus, I propose to add one more criterion to the table - "Two faces of Oblomov".

4. Work in groups (3 groups).

In accordance with these criteria for comparing heroes, students are given an assignment for research:

1) for each group, choose 2 criteria for comparing the heroes (if the children cannot do this themselves, the teacher himself distributes the tasks);

3) find material for comparison according to this criterion (write out quotations);

4) give an answer to the research question "Is Andrei Stolts an antipode or a double of Ilya Oblomov?";

5) formulate an answer to the problematic question of the lesson "Why did Andrei Stolz fail to change the way of life of Ilya Oblomov ?;

6) arrange a worksheet.

5. Exchange of information.

After the study, the guys exchange information using worksheets (Appendix 2, Appendix 3.)

6. Summing up.

Teacher's word: We see that Andrei Stolts is Ilya Oblomov's double by most criteria. This will also be the reason why Andrei could not change the life of Ilya Oblomov.

7. Reflection. Assessment.

8. Assignment to the house.

A written answer to the question "Why did Olga prefer Stolz to Oblomom?"

The novel by Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov "Oblomov" rightfully occupies an important place in the luggage of Russian classical literature of the nineteenth century. A work that reveals the characters of people living at the same time and in the same society cannot but attract attention, and the biographies of two friends, Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolts, deserve special attention.

Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is an ambiguous and very curious character. He spends his days on his beloved couch, being in eternal half-asleep and a kind of state of relaxed apathy. He is not interested in active work, or in the economy, or in self-development - his whole life is like a sluggish river flow, measured and unhurried. It can be noted that this lifestyle was also encouraged by Ilya Ilyich's parents - he was brought up in love and tenderness, and sometimes he was too much taken care of, which led to the formation of a frankly infantile attitude towards life at a conscious age. Dreams, dreams and memories of a happy childhood - this is what Oblomov's world consists of.

Oblomov's childhood friend, Andrei Ivanovich Stolz, is the complete opposite of the main character of the novel. Stolz is hardworking, and this trait was instilled in him from the earliest years of life. Parents of Andrei Ivanovich, by their example, showed the hero how important it is to be an economic and active person, so as not to simply live your life in vain. But, in my opinion, there are a number of misconceptions in Stolz's life style - the character literally "lives" by work, his whole life is planned out by the hour and minute, there is no place for surprises and simple human joys, not clouded by the constant oppression of the need to work and it is banal to keep Everything's under control.

Despite the fact that Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolts are completely different, their friendship lasts more than one decade. Stolz respects Oblomov for his kindness and honesty, and Oblomov appreciates high moral qualities and decency in a friend. Observing the history of their friendship, you begin to think about how minor character traits, life guidelines and goals can be, if the main thing lives in the soul of people - goodness, justice, openness and willingness to help and support.

In my opinion, in the novel Oblomov, Goncharov shows readers how important it is to respect and appreciate each other, even if we are talking about people who are completely different from each other. Neither Stolz nor Oblomov can be called ideal people, but they are able to demonstrate their best qualities and be loyal friends, and this is worth a lot.

Option 2

Goncharov, creating a novel called Oblomov, showed readers two specific types of people. Such different people. And both are inherently unhappy ... Drawing the images of Oblomov and Stolz, the author captured in them qualities that were different from each other. It cannot be argued that the qualities of any of the heroes presented are negative. No, these are some kind of flaws that sometimes you don't pay attention to. And often habits are too difficult to get rid of ...

Ilya Oblomov ... A real dreamer, a true romantic. Since childhood, he grew up carefree. The child did not know what commitment and curiosity were. All his life he was away from fame and luxury. The hero grew up at home, completely unprepared for life's circumstances.

At an early age, his son's mother took too much care of him, which is why Oblomov left the family as a sloven and inexperienced person. The character loves to be in the fantasy world so much that he forgets about reality. That is why often his pastime is in dreams, rarely the hero wanders the streets. Oblomov is not able to work, he is too gentle and weak for work. However, the character is notable for the fact that in any situation, his feelings are above all. Not the material in priority, but the spiritual component!

What can I say about Stolz? This character is the complete antipode of Oblomov. He dresses brilliantly, well-educated, hard-working man. Since childhood, he showed curiosity about all the oddities in this world. From an early age his mother managed to bring art into Stolz's life, to introduce the boy to music and books. The father did not infringe upon the freedom of his own child. He knew that if a person is interested, then in no case should this curiosity be ruled out. Otherwise, the child will lose all attachment to the world. Therefore, the hero often left home for the night in order to explore new areas and outskirts. He himself was responsible for his own life. He himself took on the punishment for disobedience. Already in the early period of childhood, the child learned the important qualities of adults. Responsibility, integrity, pursuit of excellence. That is why Stolz was known as a successful person. He has an excellent job that brings in huge income. His wardrobe is gorgeous. However, the hero does not care about family relationships. It is tied in numbers and calculations. His calling is to work like a machine. But behind this, Stolz has nothing ... Feelings do not come out ...

Comparing the two heroes of Goncharov's novel, it should be noted that Stolz and Oblomov are completely different personalities. If the first is a hard worker, then the other is a real dreamer. For Stolz, it is important to set goals and achieve them. For Oblomov to draw a heavenly life in his head. But, remarkably, Stolz's beloved initially longed to be with Oblomov. Why? The answer is simple: Oblomov had real feelings. A sincere smile, beautiful eyes, childish slovenliness. All this attracted. However, due to the fear of Ilya, the beloved doves could not find each other. But with Stolz, the heroine was not happy either. They didn't even have children. So understand where the right choice is!

Composition of Oblomov and Stolz

One of the topics touched upon by Alexander Goncharov in the novel Oblomov is friendship between completely different people and how it is capable of changing a person in one direction or another.

Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is the son of hereditary nobles. He grew up a cheerful, cheerful, active boy, but his parents, with their excessive care, made him a lazy, passive, not purposeful, unable to express himself. He was spoiled. I did not strive for knowledge either at the boarding school or at the university. He was always overweight, often complained of health.

After graduating, he enters the service, where he receives the rank of collegiate secretary. But his career does not work out due to simple stupidity, Ilya sends documents to the wrong address.

At thirty-two, Oblomov only lies on the couch, not trying to find something to do. He is a dreamy homebody. The parents' estate brings only losses, since Ilya does not want to deal with it, and he is not strong in financial matters either.

In dealing with women, he is always tactful. He was in love with Olga Ilyinskaya, whom he caused a lot of suffering. As a result, he tied the knot with the widow Pshenitsyna, she did not demand anything from him and this completely suited him.

Andrei Ivanovich Stolz, on the contrary, was brought up in severity, he was always an inquisitive, smart boy. He strove for knowledge. He is quite hardworking and not a bit spoiled. He grew up as a strong, courageous, self-confident person. Andrey is thin, there are no cheeks at all, his skin is dark. Travels a lot, reads books, loves life as it is. From him comes masculinity and health.

Thanks to dedication and hard work, Stolz becomes a wealthy person. He is respected in society.

In a relationship with Olga Ilyinskaya, she behaves like a real man and achieves her goal - to marry her beloved woman.

Andrey has always been a realist, so dreams are meaningless for him. There are always clearly defined goals in his head, and he knows exactly how to achieve them.

Oblomov and Stolz are best friends since childhood. Whenever possible, they always came to each other's aid. Andrei helped Ilya in life, everyday problems, and Ilya Andrei just with emotional conversations that helped to restore peace of mind.

The life of a teenager is very difficult. This is a difficult age in which many problems can be expected. It is very difficult to cope with them alone. Most adults say teenage life is easy because they live in their parents' house.

Characteristics of the heroes of the work Three comrades Remarque

Remarque in his work "Three Comrades" described the life and fate of ordinary soldiers and veterans and victims of political repression. Through the images of heroes, the author wanted to show

Nature fascinates with its fantastic landscapes, pleases the human eye, brings a lot of positive emotions. The beauty of nature is unique at any time of the year.

Autumn is known to everyone as a very rainy season. Not everyone is pleased to come home after a short walk in clothes soaked through.

In the novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov” one of the main methods for disclosing images is the method of antithesis. With the help of opposition, the image of the Russian master Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is compared with the image of the practical German Andrei Stolz. Thus, Goncharov shows what is the similarity and what is the difference between these heroes of the novel.

Ilya Ilyich Oblomov - a typical representative of the Russian nobility of the 19th century. His social position can be briefly described as follows: "Oblomov, a nobleman by birth, a collegiate secretary in rank, has been living in St. Petersburg for twelve years without a break." By nature, Oblomov is a gentle and calm person, trying not to disturb his usual way of life. "His movements, when he was even alarmed, were also restrained by gentleness and laziness, not devoid of a kind of grace." Oblomov spends whole days at home, lying on his couch and thinking about the necessary transformations in his Oblomovka estate. Moreover, his face often lacked any definite idea. “The thought walked like a free bird over the face, fluttered in the eyes, sat on half-open lips, hid in the folds of the forehead, then completely disappeared, and then an even light of carelessness glimmered in my whole face”. Even at home “he was lost in the tide of everyday worries and kept lying, tossing and turning from side to side”. Oblomov shuns secular society and generally tries not to go out. His serene state is disturbed only by visitors who come to Oblomov only for selfish purposes. Tarantiev, for example, simply steals from Oblomov, constantly borrowing money from him and not returning it. Oblomov turns out to be a victim of his visitors, not understanding the real purpose of their visits. Oblomov is so remote from real life that light for him represents eternal vanity without any purpose. "No sincere laughter, no glimpse of sympathy ... what kind of life is this?" - Oblomov exclaims, considering communication with secular society an empty pastime. But suddenly the calm and measured life of Ilya Ilyich is interrupted. What happened? His youth friend Stolz arrives, with whom Oblomov connects hopes for improving his situation.

“Stolz is the same age as Oblomov: he is already over thirty years old. He served, retired, went about his business and really made a house and money. " The son of a burgher, Stolz, can be considered the antipode of the idle 19th century Russian master Oblomov. From early childhood he was brought up in harsh conditions, gradually getting used to the hardships and hardships of life. His father is German, his mother is Russian, but Stolz inherited practically nothing from her. His father was fully involved in his upbringing, so the son grew up as practical and purposeful. "It is all composed of bones, muscles and nerves, like a blood English horse." Unlike Oblomov, Stolz "was afraid of every dream," "the mysterious, the mysterious had no place in his soul." If Oblomov's normal state can be called lying, then Stolz's is movement. Stolz's main task was "a simple, that is, a direct, real outlook on life." But what then connects Oblomov and Stolz? Childhood and school - this is what connected such people who are so different in character and in views for the rest of their lives. However, in his youth, Oblomov was just as active and passionate about knowledge as Stolz. They spent long hours together reading books and studying various sciences. But upbringing and a gentle character still played a role, and Oblomov soon departed from Stolz. Subsequently, Stolz tries to bring his friend back to life, but his attempts are fruitless: Oblomovism swallowed Oblomov.

Thus, the method of antithesis is one of the main methods in the novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov”. With the help of the antithesis, Goncharov compares not only the images of Oblomov and Stolz, he also compares the objects around them and reality. Using the method of antithesis, Goncharov continues the tradition of many Russian writers. For example, N. A. Ostrovsky in his work "The Thunderstorm" contrasts Kabanikh and Katerina. If for Kabanikha “Domostroy” is the ideal of life, for Katerina above all love, honesty and mutual understanding. And, S. Griboyedov in the immortal work "Woe from Wit", using the method of antithesis, compares Chatsky and Famusov.

• In the novel "Oblomov" the mastery of Goncharov as a prose writer was fully manifested. Gorky, who called Goncharov "one of the giants of Russian literature," noted his special, plastic language. The poetic language of Goncharov, his talent for figurative reproduction of life, the art of creating typical characters, compositional completeness and the enormous artistic power of the picture of Oblomovism and the image of Ilya Ilyich presented in the novel - all this contributed to the fact that the novel "Oblomov" took its rightful place among the masterpieces [...]
• There is a type of book where the reader is carried away by the story not from the first pages, but gradually. I think Oblomov is just such a book. Reading the first part of the novel, I was inexpressibly bored and did not even imagine that Oblomov's laziness would lead him to some kind of sublime feeling. Gradually, the boredom began to go away, and the novel captured me, I read it with interest. I have always liked books about love, but Goncharov gave it an interpretation unknown to me. It seemed to me that boredom, monotony, laziness, [...]
• In his novel Oblomov, the remarkable Russian prose writer of the second half of the 19th century, Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov, reflected the difficult time of transition from one era of Russian life to another. Feudal relations, the estate type of economy were replaced by the bourgeois way. For centuries, the established views of people on life were crumbling. The fate of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov can be called an "ordinary story" typical of landowners who lived serenely at the expense of the labor of serfs. The environment and upbringing made them weak-willed, apathetic people, not [...]
• Despite the significant volume of the work, there are relatively few characters in the novel. This allows Goncharov to give detailed characteristics of each of them, to compose detailed psychological portraits. Female images in the novel were no exception. In addition to psychologism, the author widely uses the method of oppositions and the system of antipodes. These pairs can be called "Oblomov and Stolz" and "Olga Ilyinskaya and Agafya Matveevna Pshenitsyna". The last two images are complete opposites of each other, their [...]
• Andrey Stolts is Oblomov's closest friend, they grew up together and carried their friendship through life. It remains a mystery how such dissimilar people with such different outlooks on life could remain deeply attached. Initially, the image of Stolz was conceived as a complete antipode to Oblomov. The author wanted to combine German prudence and the breadth of the Russian soul, but this idea was not destined to come true. As the novel developed, Goncharov realized more and more clearly that in the given conditions it was so simple [...]
• Introduction. Some people find Goncharov's novel Oblomov boring. Yes, indeed, the entire first part of Oblomov lies on the couch, receiving guests, but here we get to know the hero. In general, there are few intriguing actions and events in the novel that are so interesting to the reader. But Oblomov is “our people's type”, and it is he who is a bright representative of the Russian people. Therefore, the novel interested me. In the main character, I saw a particle of myself. Do not think that Oblomov is only a representative of Goncharov's time. And now they live [...]
• Olga Sergeevna Ilyinskaya Agafya Matveevna Pshenitsyna Character traits Fascinating, delightful, promising, good-natured, warm-hearted and unfeigned, special, innocent, proud. Good-natured, open, trusting, sweet and restrained, caring, thrifty, neat, independent, constant, stands his ground. Appearance Tall, light face, delicate thin neck, gray-blue eyes, fluffy eyebrows, long braid, small compressed lips. Gray-eyed; nice face; well-fed; […]
• Oblomov's image in Russian literature closes the row of "superfluous" people. An inactive contemplator, incapable of active action, at first glance really seems incapable of a great and bright feeling, but is this really so? In the life of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, there is no place for global and cardinal changes. Olga Ilyinskaya, an extraordinary and beautiful woman, strong and strong-willed nature, undoubtedly attracts the attention of men. For Ilya Ilyich, an indecisive and timid person, Olga becomes an object [...]
• IA Goncharov's novel is all permeated with various opposites. The reception of the antithesis on which the novel is built helps to better understand the character of the characters, the author's intention. Oblomov and Stolz are two completely different personalities, but, as they say, opposites converge. They are connected by childhood and school, which you can learn about in the chapter "Oblomov's Dream". From it it becomes clear that everyone loved little Ilya, caressed him, did not allow him to do anything himself, although at first he was eager to do everything himself, but then they resorted to him [...]
• Oblomov's personality is far from ordinary, although other characters treat him with slight disrespect. For some reason, they read it almost flawed in comparison with them. This was precisely the task of Olga Ilyinskaya - to wake Oblomov, to make him show himself as an active person. The girl believed that love would move him to great achievements. But she was deeply mistaken. It is impossible to awaken in a person what he does not have. Because of this misunderstanding, people's hearts broke, the heroes suffered and it was hard [...]
• Oblomov Stolz comes from a wealthy noble family with patriarchal traditions. his parents, like grandfathers, did nothing: serfs from a poor family worked for them: his father (a Russified German) was the manager of a rich estate, his mother, an impoverished Russian noblewoman, was upbringing, his parents taught him to be idle and calm (they did not allow him to pick up the dropped thing, dress, pour yourself some water) labor in oblomovka was a punishment, it was believed that it bears the stigma of slavery. the family had a cult of food, and [...]
• By the middle of the XIX century. Under the influence of the realistic school of Pushkin and Gogol, a new remarkable generation of Russian writers grew up and formed. The brilliant critic Belinsky already in the 40s noted the emergence of a whole group of talented young authors: Turgenev, Ostrovsky, Nekrasov, Herzen, Dostoevsky, Grigorovich, Ogarev, etc. Among these promising writers was Goncharov, the future author of Oblomov, the first novel whose "Ordinary History" was highly appreciated by Belinsky. LIFE AND CREATIVITY I. [...]
• Created eight centuries ago by the genius of the Russian people, The Lay retains the meaning of an unfading model for the present, for the future - both with its powerful patriotic sound, and inexhaustible richness of content, and the unique poetry of all its elements. The dynamic style is very characteristic of Ancient Russia. He finds himself in architecture, painting and literature. It is a style within which everything that is most significant and beautiful appears majestic. Chroniclers, authors of lives, church words [...]
• Fet's literary fate is not entirely common. His poems, written in the 40s. XIX century, were received very favorably; they were reprinted in anthologies, some of them were set to music and made Fet's name very popular. Indeed, lyric poems, imbued with spontaneity, liveliness, sincerity, could not fail to attract attention. In the early 50s. Fet was published in Sovremennik. His poems were highly appreciated by the editor of the magazine Nekrasov. He wrote about Fet: “Something strong and fresh, pure [...]
• Sonya Marmeladova for Dostoevsky is the same as Tatyana Larina for Pushkin. We see the author's love for his heroine everywhere. We see how he admires her, idolizes and somewhere even protects her from misfortune, no matter how strange it sounds. Sonya is a symbol, a divine ideal, a sacrifice for the salvation of humanity. She is like a guiding thread, like a moral model, despite her occupation. Sonya Marmeladova is the antagonist of Raskolnikov. And if we divide the heroes into positive and negative, then Raskolnikov will [...]
• This is not an easy question. The path that must be traversed to find the answer to it is painful and long. And will you find it? Sometimes it seems that this is impossible. Truth is not only a good thing, but also a stubborn thing. The further you go in search of an answer, the more questions you face. It’s not too late, but who’s going halfway? And there is still time, but who knows, maybe the answer is two steps away from you? Truth is tempting and multifaceted, but its essence is always the same. Sometimes a person thinks that he has already found the answer, but it turns out that this is a mirage. […]
• The theme of Petersburg was set in Russian literature by Pushkin. It is in his "Bronze Horseman", in "The Queen of Spades" that we encounter a two-faced city: the beautiful, mighty Petersburg, the creation of Peter, and the city of poor Eugene, a city whose very existence turns into a tragedy for the little man. In the same way, Gogol's Petersburg is two-faced: a brilliant fantastic city is sometimes hostile to a person whose fate can be broken not on the streets of the northern capital. Petersburg of Nekrasov is sad - Petersburg of ceremonial [...]
• Among the best students I had the opportunity to go to Moscow. The day after arrival we were taken on an excursion to the State Tretyakov Gallery. I entered the huge hall. I was surrounded by a "society" of paintings. I walked slowly through the hall, carefully examining every work of great, famous artists, and suddenly stopped for some reason near the most, in my opinion, ordinary picture. It depicted the landscape of a Russian village. Examining it carefully, I finally found the creator of this [...]
• In general, the history of the creation and the idea of \u200b\u200bthe play "The Thunderstorm" is very interesting. For some time, there was an assumption that this work was based on real events that occurred in the Russian city of Kostroma in 1859. “In the early morning of November 10, 1859, the Kostroma bourgeoisie Alexandra Pavlovna Klykova disappeared from her home and either threw herself into the Volga, or was strangled and thrown there. The investigation revealed a dull drama played out in an unsociable family living with narrowly commercial interests: [...]
• Nekrasov's poem "Who Lives Well in Russia" occupies a special place both in the history of Russian classical literature and in the poet's creative heritage. It is a synthesis of Nekrasov's poetic activity, the completion of the many years of creative work of the revolutionary poet. Everything that Nekrasov developed in individual works for thirty years is collected here in a single concept, grandiose in content, scope and courage. All the main lines of his poetic quests merged in him, most fully [...]

The novel "Oblomov" is one of the iconic works of the 19th century, covering many social and philosophical themes. An important role in revealing the ideological meaning of the work is played by the analysis of the relationship in the book of the two main male characters. In the novel "Oblomov", the characterization of Oblomov and Stolz reflects their completely different natures, opposed by the author.
According to the plot of the work, the heroes are best friends from an early age, helping each other as much as possible even in adulthood: Stolz Oblomov - by solving many of his pressing problems, and Ilya Ilyich to Andrei Ivanovich - with pleasant conversations that allow Stolz to restore peace of mind.

Portrait characteristics of heroes

Comparative characteristics of Oblomov and Stolz in Goncharov's novel Oblomov are given by the author himself and is most remarkable when comparing their portrait characteristics, as well as characters. Ilya Ilyich is a soft, quiet, kind, dreamy, reflective goof who makes any decision at the behest of his heart, even if his mind leads the hero to the opposite conclusions. The appearance of the introverted Oblomov fully corresponds to his character - his movements are soft, lazy, round, and the image is characterized by excessive effeminacy, not typical for a man.

Stolz, both internally and externally, is completely different from Oblomov. The main thing in the life of Andrei Ivanovich is the rational grain, in all matters he relies only on reason, while the dictates of the heart, intuition and the sphere of feelings for the hero are not only something secondary, but also inaccessible, incomprehensible to his rational reflections. Unlike Oblomov, "flabby beyond his years", Stolz seems to consist of "bones, muscles and nerves." His life is a rapid race forward, an important attribute of which is the constant self-development of the individual and continuous work. The images of Oblomov and Stolz seem to be a mirror image of each other: active, extroverted, successful in society and in the career field, Stolz is contrasted with the lazy, apathetic, unwilling to communicate with anyone, let alone re-enter the service, Oblomov.

Differences in raising heroes

When comparing Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolz, as well as for a better understanding of the characters' images, it is important to briefly describe the atmosphere in which each of the characters grew up. Despite the "addictive", as if covering with a veil of half-sleep and laziness, Oblomovka's environment little Ilya was a cheerful, active and curious child, which at first is very similar to Stolz. He wanted to learn as much as possible about the world around him, but the excessive care of his parents, the "hothouse" upbringing, the inculcation of obsolete, obsolete and aimed at the ideals of the past, made the child a worthy successor of the traditions of "Oblomovism", the bearer of the "Oblomov" worldview - lazy, introverted, living in his own illusory world.

However, Stolz also did not grow the way he could have grown. At first glance, the combination in his upbringing of the strict approach of a German father and the tenderness of a noble mother of Russian origin would allow Andrei to become a harmonious, comprehensively developed personality. Nevertheless, as the author points out, Stolz grew "a cactus accustomed to drought." The young man lacked love, warmth and gentleness, since he was mainly raised by his father, who did not believe that a man needed to be instilled in sensitivity. However, Stolz's Russian roots until the end of his life were looking for this warmth, finding it in Oblomov, and then in the idea of \u200b\u200bOblomovka, which he denied.

Education and career of heroes

The contradictory character of Stolz and Oblomov manifests itself already in his youth, when Andrei Ivanovich, trying to learn as much as possible about the world around him, tried to instill in Ilya Ilyich a love of books, to light a flame in him that would make him strive forward. And Stolz succeeded, but for a very short time - as soon as Oblomov remained on his own, the book for him became less important than, for example, a dream. Somehow, more likely for his parents, Ilya Ilyich graduates from high school, and then from university, where he was absolutely not interested, since the hero did not understand how mathematics and other sciences could be useful to him in life. Even a single failure in the service was the end of his career for him - it was too hard for the sensitive, soft Oblomov to rebuild under the strict rules of the capital world, far from the norms of life in Oblomovka.

Stolz, on the other hand, with his rational, active outlook on the world, is much easier to move up the career ladder, because any failure was more likely another incentive for him than a defeat. Andrei Ivanovich's continuous activity, high working capacity, ability to please others made him a useful person at any workplace and a pleasant guest in any society, and all thanks to the purposefulness laid down by his father and the continuous thirst for knowledge, which his parents developed in Stolz as a child.

Characteristics of Oblomov and Stolz as carriers of two opposite principles

In the critical literature, when comparing Oblomov and Stolz, it is widely believed that the characters are two opposites, two types of “superfluous” heroes who, in their “pure” form, cannot be found in real life, even though Oblomov is a realistic novel , and, therefore, the described images must be typical images. However, when analyzing the upbringing and formation of each of the characters, the reasons for Oblomov's apathy, laziness and dreaminess become clear, as well as excessive dryness, rationality, even a similarity with a certain Stolz mechanism.

Comparison of Stolz and Oblomov makes it possible to understand that both heroes are personalities not only typical of their time, but also tendentious images for any time. Oblomov is a typical son of wealthy parents, brought up in an atmosphere of love and heightened care, protected by his family from the need to work, decide something and actively act, because there will always be "Zakhar" who will do everything for him. Stolz, on the other hand, is a person who is taught from an early age to the need to work and work, while being deprived of love and care, which leads to a certain inner callousness of such a person, to a misunderstanding of the nature of feelings and emotional deprivation.

Product test

The ingenious novel by Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov introduces us to two diametrically opposed images: their characterization can take pages and pages. After all, they are completely different: in their temperament, in their attitude to life and worldview. Goncharov wrote it for ten years! What do you think, dear readers, would an academician of the St. Petersburg Academy of Literature “steam” for a whole decade, writing a novel in the form of a “one-layer” pie? What is easier for a Corresponding Member to compose a story about two friends! One is lazy beyond measure. The other is amazingly efficient. But no. A novel has been written about all of us! And we will try to prove it. Oblomov and Stolz will help us in this study.

The image of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov

The landowner Oblomov outwardly is a plump, loose man with dark gray eyes, who prefers a passive lifestyle, lying on the couch, doing nothing. In all his appearance, carelessness is visible, but his face is spiritualized. And the thought is constantly present in him, it glows in the eyes, hides in the wrinkles of the forehead, bends along with the lips. However, this idea is "toothless", it has no practical application. Comparative and Stolz are clearly not in favor of Ilya Ilyich. He is a hereditary landowner. He has 350 serf souls. Nice, solid mansion in St. Petersburg, dacha, country house. Oblomov has no idea how to take care of all this property in his possession. He is like a child, at first he is robbed by the clerk, and then the fraudsters Mikhei Andreevich Tarantiev and Ivan Matveyevich Mukhoyarov are driven to ruin.

He is educated but has no practical work experience. Under the influence of his first failures in the service, a psychological "sloth complex" was formed, which Ilya Ilyich was unable to overcome.

The image of Andrei Stolz

According to the plot of the novel, they are familiar and friendly from school: Oblomov and Stolz. Comparative characteristics indicate the closeness of their caste origin. Andrei Stolts was born in the family of a German clerk Ivan Bogdanovich and a simple but educated Russian woman. The relationship between his status and that of a friend-landowner is similar to the relationship between a business owner and a top manager. From childhood, his father taught him to be industrious through regular studies in science and bookkeeping. Andrey is a lean man with sunken cheeks, dark skin and greenish expressive eyes. He is hyperactive: he is constantly on the move, like a shark. The writer speaks of his hero as if he consists of only muscles and tendons. He knows languages, is quick-witted, therefore it is he who is sent by the trading company-employer as an agent to Belgium. In addition, Stolz is able to use his knowledge creatively. Therefore, colleagues prefer to invite him to develop projects. Oblomov and Stolz have a different attitude to money. Comparative characteristics indicate the prudence of the latter.

Secret subtext of Goncharov's images?

The fact that, by and large, the images of Stolz and Oblomov are not independent, but allegorical, the author of the novel shows in their relationship with Olga Ilyinskaya. On the one hand, she can neither win nor keep, but the spineless Ilya Ilyich invariably attracts with his romanticism, pure childish soul. On the other hand, Stolz, who became her husband, pathologically does not feel the difference between business cooperation and sincerity. On a romantic wedding trip to Paris, he is, to put it mildly, unconvincing.

Why did Goncharov create these two images: Oblomov and Stolz? Is the comparative characterization of these images just an instructive conclusion? Contrasting characters? Or maybe we need to look at it more broadly? After all, each of us, of course, knows how much "Stolz" is in it and how much "Oblomov" is in it. What is a dream that does not touch the ground. A global dream, devoid of any desire for realization. And what is Stolz? It is down-to-earthness, business acumen, a sense of partnership. So let's ask ourselves the question: "If you create something global, is it possible to discard a dream in principle?" (As you know, Stolz avoided dreaming.) Hardly.

And you, dear readers, do you agree with the conclusion below? To create a truly successful personality promoting fantastic projects, you need to mix in one glass 30% of the dreamer-Oblomov and 70% of the fanatic of Stolz's work. Isn't that what Goncharov wanted to tell us? After all, an adopted son appeared in the Stolts family. Of course, a proper education will develop his business acumen. But what about the ability to dream? Genes after all, you know ...