Preparation for the exam in Russian language - Collection of texts. Text of beauty. EGE It would seem Beauty concept Wide essays

(1) It would seem: Beauty is a broad concept, and it is not always clear what exactly it means.

(2) When Great Fedor Mikhailovich said that this most beauty will save the world, he probably had the least to mean beautiful people and beautiful views. (H) It was about the beauty of the act, about the beauty of courage and femininity, the beauty of faith, transparent and honest.

(4) Good beautifully, mercy is beautiful, the feat is beautiful. (5) Beautiful prayer, honesty is beautiful, tenderness is beautiful.

(6) The world is filled with beauty as happiness. (7) Another question is that beauty probably will not save anyone.

(8) Since the beginning of the century, we learned to use the beauty as it is convenient for us. (9) Soak meanness and vulgarity inside out, making beautiful any weaknesses and dimensions.

(10) At the time, the beauty was infinitely far from the center of the universe - and any passionate and honest heart sought to this center. (11) The highest point of beauty, its focus, one could call harmony. (12) The world was looking for harmony.

(13) Today, beauty has become a man's maid with his infinite desire to give the nobility and meaning any of his unsightly act.

(14) Harmonious existence, a harmonious look at things, harmonious Being is completely replaced by something else. (15) for modern man Harmony is comfort. (16) The current harmonious look at things is a steady habit of seeing and know what I want to see and know, and the refusal of knowledge about things difficult, complex and untidy.

(17) The authenticity, which, of course, is the main content and bloodary system of beauty, has become somewhat obscene, shameful, strange.

(20) The feat is no longer. (21) It became, in fact, it is not focused - because he insults a person who is not inclined to the empires. (22) Naturally, there are no national heroes. (23) Rather, there are rare passing in national heroes, which are still unknown where place.

(24) Similarly, harmony with the resulting essence has become a comorter and the authenticity replaced the image. (25) The image is a sub-linency with a carved heart and light. (26) A mannequin remained - with a glued smile, with empty glass eyes ... (27) But if you look closely at him - you immediately notice that he does not blink her eyes.

(28) The world becomes more and more Triune, and our current trinity is the image, comfort, glamor. (29) They are inseparable and interrelated. (30) Image and comfort create glamor. (31) Glamor and comfort make an image. (32) Where is there, in these deadlocks, under the emulsion of heaven, squeeze the beauty, how to manifest itself on the light of God?

(ZZ) Beauty Everything does not come, everything does not come in any way. (34) How does she squeeze into our new, wonderful world? (35) We have here and so around a lot of pleasant and smooth to the touch of things.

(36) And the abstract concepts occupy too much space.

(37) Absoral concepts occupy too much heart. (38) Absoral concepts are forced to breathe too often and it's still sometimes to fall from incomprehensibleness of being. (39) We expelled them. (40) We wish to live specifically. (41) for specific concepts.

(42) But, driving abnormal concepts, we left themselves from beauty.

(43) Beauty is non-specific. (44) It can not be formulated, package, and then use as needed.

(45) We must be distracted from specific concepts. (46) Too many serious people around. (47) Too little beautiful.

(By 3. Prilepin *)

* Zakhar Prilepin (real name Evgeny Nikolaevich Prilepin; born in 1975) - Russian writer, philologist, journalist, politician, businessman, actor, musician. Laureate of many literary awards, such as the "Russian Booker of Decade" (2011), "Super Natsbest", "Bronze Snail" for the best fantastic romance of the year - "Black Monkey" (2012) and others. His novel "Sin" is named best Book decades (2011).

(1) It would seem: Beauty is a broad concept, and it is not always clear what exactly it means.

(2) When the Great Fedor Mikhailovich said that this most beauty would save the world, he probably had the least of all meaning beautiful people and beautiful views. (H) It was about the beauty of the act, about the beauty of courage and femininity, the beauty of faith, transparent and honest.

(4) Good beautifully, mercy is beautiful, the feat is beautiful. (5) Beautiful prayer, honesty is beautiful, tenderness is beautiful.

(6) The world is filled with beauty as happiness. (7) Another question is that beauty probably will not save anyone.

(8) Since the beginning of the century, we learned to use the beauty as it is convenient for us.

(9) Soak meanness and vulgarity inside out, making beautiful any weaknesses and dimensions.

(13) Today, beauty has become a man's maid with his infinite desire to give the nobility and meaning any of his unsightly act.

(14) Harmonious existence, a harmonious look at things, harmonious Being is completely replaced by something else. (15) For a modern man, harmony is comfort. (16) The current harmonious look at things is a steady habit of seeing and know what I want to see and know, and the refusal of knowledge about things difficult, complex and untidy. (17) The authenticity, which, of course, is the main content and bloodary system of beauty, has become somewhat obscene, shameful, strange.

(18) Genuine mercy is almost not heard, almost lost among the lush and vulgar gestures of people are obvious and thoroughly through the mercies. (19) a man who committed an authentic feat is easier to die three times in a row than to gain attention to him by the people. (20) The feat is no longer. (21) It became, in fact, it is not focused - because he insults a person who is not inclined to the empires. (22) Naturally, there are no national heroes. (23) Rather, there are rare passing in national heroes, which are still unknown where place.

(24) just like harmony with the resulting essence has become comfortable and the authenticity replaced the image. (25) The image is authenticity with a carved heart and light. (26) A mannequin remained - with a glued smile, with empty glass eyes ... (27) But if you look closely at him - you immediately notice that he does not blink her eyes.

(28) The world becomes more and more Triune, and our current trinity is the image, comfort, glamor. (29) They are inseparable and interrelated. (З0) Image and comfort create glamor. (31) Glamor and comfort make an image. (32) Where is there, in these deadlocks, under the emulsion of heaven, squeeze the beauty, how to manifest itself on the light of God?

(33) Beauty does not come, everything does not come. (34) How does she squeeze into our new, wonderful world? (35) We have here and so around a lot of pleasant and smooth to the touch of things.

(36) And the abstract concepts occupy too much space. (37) Absoral concepts occupy too much heart. (38) Absoral concepts are forced to breathe too often and it's still sometimes to fall from incomprehensibleness of being. (39) We expelled them. (40) We wish to live specifically. (41) for specific concepts.

(42) But, driving abnormal concepts, we left themselves from beauty.

(43) Beauty is non-specific. (44) It can not be formulated, package, and then use as needed.

(45) We must be distracted from specific concepts. (46) Too many serious people around. (47) Too little beautiful.

(By 3. Prilepin *)

* Zakhar Prilepin (real name Evgeny Nikolaevich Prilepin; born in 1975) - Russian writer, philologist, journalist, politician, businessman, actor, musician. Laureate of many literary premiums, such as "Russian Booker Decade" (2011), "Super Natzbest", "Bronze Snail" for the best fantastic romance of the year - "Black Monkey" (2012) and others. His Roman "Sin" is named the best book of the decade (2011).

Show text entirely

What is beauty? What is it manifested? The Zakhar Prilepin reflects on these issues.

In this text, the author's focus is the actual problem of true human beauty. Relying on the words of Fedor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky, who spoke that "beauty saves the world", We need to understand that it is not at all about the external beauty, but "... about the beauty of the act, about the beauty of courage and femininity, about the beauty of faith ...". An impressive appearance is not always a guarantor of the appeal of the soul.

The position of Zakhar Prilepina is as follows: in modern world Top there is no place left for beauty, as an abstract concept. It exists only as a means of achieving goals. People do not think that beauty is inner world, not appearance.

I agree with the opinion of the author and I think that in our time to find truly beautiful man - The task is not the lungs. My contemporaries are convinced that

Kofanova Victoria, Vishneva Elizabeth, Perovskaya Elena, Borisova Olga, Vishneva Anastasia, Dubovitsky Alexander

Overactions-reasoning

Download:

Preview:

There is no more indefinite concept in this world than "happiness." Everyone presents it in different ways: for someone it is a huge amount of money, for others - a large and friendly family, for some - freedom, the ability to do everything that wants. Options are infinite set. But most people think that happiness is something far and often incomprehensible. They forget that there are so many reasons for him that everything depends only on how to evaluate what is happening with man. It is this problem that is the problem of being happy - and raises the passage presented to us Zakhar Prilepin, a Russian writer and journalist.

Commenting on this problem, the author invites you to remember how simple things did we happy in childhood, asks if the man I remembered, I learned and saw a reason for happiness. And a little later, he remembers the episode of own LifeWhen those who have seen in the subway, the fears and their parents who collect alms, forced him to cry, and then call his wife and offer her to be happy. The contrast of these two parts of the text makes the reader closer to the heart to take the problem, to understand the writer's thoughts deeper.

The position of the author in relation to the problem is expressed quite clearly. He believes that happiness comes only to those who are configured to comprehend the main dream of mankind: to live a man, to be a man, love to man. He also claims that people simply do not have the right to feel unhappy against the background of how many living souls have disappeared before the term on this earth, how many of them were wildly and terribly dismissed, mercilessly and disappeared.

Personally, I fully agree with the opinion of the author. The world around us is filled with such unbearable sadness and sorrow that we are simply obliged to "sentence" fortunately at least themselves. People should understand how much we who live at this time is lucky: we are alive, are not surrounded by war and death, we have the opportunity to get education and work, to realize the abilities and fulfill dreams. We must learn to appreciate it and look for happiness in simple things.

And how often the problem of happiness affects the works of Russian literature. Recall at least Natasha Rostov, the heroine of the novel of Leo Tolstoy "War and Peace". There were many sad events in her life: she lost his brother, was forced to flee from Moscow with his family, leaving all his property, cared for the wounded beloved, Andrei Bologkoe, to his very death. But the world comes to her life, and Natasha finds his happiness in the family - her husband, Pierre Bezukhov, and children.

Another example may be the story of A.P. Chekhov "Lady with a dog", in which the resort novel in Yalta turns around present love. The author follows his own traditions and leaves the final of the work open, demonstrating the heroes, still bound by the circumstances, families and children, but they understand that they found their happiness and will not be able to live without each other.

What can I say in conclusion? How often ask yourself questions "Are I happy?" And "What can I do to be happy?" After all, we have only one life, and you should not spend her wasted.

(Cofanova Victoria, EGE-2014)

The question of happiness throughout the time caused a huge number of contradictions in people, exciting the minds of the great thinkers. But what is happiness? How to understand what are you happy?

The Russian writer and journalist Zakhar Prilepin are trying to answer these questions. In his article, he affects the problem of people's relationship to happiness, argues what importance it has in achieving this cherished feeling.

The writer draws attention to how simply a person "make you embarrass", experience joy, remembering the lives lived - after all, he could not remember anything, not to know, not to see.

The author's position in this work is expressed clearly. Emotionic speech give funds artistic expressiveness: In particular, syntax. Rhetorical issues, exclamation proposals - all this helps us see how the author is not indifferent to the problem raised by him in the work. Prilepin is confident that the person whom the soil and food is surrounded everywhere for happiness is simply no right to feel unhappy. According to the author, the person produces happiness himself, as energy, you only need to contribute to it.

It is difficult to disagree with the writer and his arguments. I fully share the belief of Prilepin, that happiness is the fruit of the imagination of one person, in the very best sense of this word. Poets, prose, publicists in their works reflect their vision of happiness. So the great Russian poet Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin in his poem "Time, my friend, it's time" wrote: "There is no happiness in the world, there is only peace and will." Is the poet denied the opportunity to be happy? In no case. After all, the condition of happiness always inspired creative people to especially emotional works. The question is that a person puts into the concept of happiness, the exact definition of which for the entire existence of the land was not given. According to Pushkin, a person for happiness requires feelings of "rest" and "will", calm and freedom, peace and opportunity to choose their destiny.

Seven men, the heroes of the poem Nekrasov "Who lives well in Russia", went searching for happy man. During his search, men found that the material benefits do not make people satisfied with life. Happiness inside, in the soul of man, in his thoughts and affairs. Alas, people often forget that everything comes to comparison - it does not allow them to fully experience love for life.

The Americans considered happiness as an important attribute of the worthy existence of a person, which even included lines about him into the text of the State Constitution: "We all proceed from the obvious truth that all people are created equal and endowed with the Creator a number of inalted rights that are entitled to life, freedom And the desire for happiness. " The desire for happiness Many put one of the main goals in life, not realizing that happiness, like power, cannot be an end in itself. This is a way to achieve goals, which is useful for health.

What conclusion did we come to? Regardless of the contradictions of people's relationship to happiness, its reasons and manifestations, "the world around us is filled with such unbearable sorrow and sadness that we simply have no other choice than irrevocably and forever to sentence themselves at least yourself", multiplying this feeling of the day From day, after all, happiness is the state of the soul.

(Vishneva Elizabeth, EGE -2014)

I read the article by Vladimir Alekseevich Solowkina with great interest about the work of outstanding Russian poets. In his arguments, the author raises the problem of the influence of nature on the formation of a person.

Commenting the problem, the Soviet writer and the poet, analyzes the works famous poets, there is a reflection of Russian landscapes and places in which these creative personalities have grown, in verses written by them. The author notes the oaks in Lermontov poems, birch in the works of Yesenin, herbs, swamps, fogs in the creations of the block. Thanks to Vladimir Alekseevich, we notice the impact of the species and beauties around us on our activities. In addition, the author highlights the poems in Russian poems to a homeland uniting all Russians to this day.

Solochina's position is obvious. He is convinced of a huge power of the influence of Russia's nature on the formation of a person. He writes: "Some become bright and clean colors, some - breadfall, some - evil thistle." The author compares us with plants, makes it possible to understand the character of a person through the Wednesday in which he has grown.

I fully agree with the author's opinion. A man who grown in the picturesque edges, in the beauty of his beloved country will be significantly different from the hostage of concrete jungle. The same type of houses will never be the subject of human reeble; In the heart west only natural medium. Our heart is often asked for freedom, to the beloved place in the distance from the city, to the clean air and the penetration sensuality of nature, to a relaxed atmosphere. It is in such regions that we gain harmony with the world around the world, love for homeland and mental changes.

In the literature, it is often possible to notice the effect of nature on the work of certain writers and poets. Recall Mikhail Privain's stories, full descriptions of various landscapes. He described the world around the world with such a thrill and accuracy, as if drawing in words the picture in our consciousness. In his story "Storeroom Sun" you can feel the admiration of the main characters (brother and sisters) by the beauty and danger of the forest. Nastya, collecting cranberries, completely forgot about the brother, who experienced all the cunning swamps on himself. Privain writes about the salvation of the boy, but warns us to be careful with such beauty.

In addition to the literature figures, many artists and musicians succumbed to the influence of the beauty of Russia. By visiting the art gallery in the winter, I still remember the magnificent landscapes of Serov and Shishkin, who did not leave me indifferent. Feeling in love with their work, I recognize my beautiful country. All artists, writers, poets, musicians in their works and works give us a part of the soul, which they adopted in Russia in childhood.

Thus, it can be said that nature bears the greatest role in the formation of the person. Native edges give a person a sense of patriotism, responsibility for themselves, for loved ones, for their homeland, and most importantly, understanding the beautiful.

(Persian Elena, 2014)

I read the excerpt from the article by Vladimir Alekseevich Solowkina with great interest. In it, the famous Russian writer and the poet raises the problem of childhood importance in the formation of the character and qualities of the human soul. But is it only childhood is a decisive factor in the formation of a person?

Commenting on this problem, the author leads an example of the effect of the beauty of Russian nature on the creativity of poets. Most often, this is manifested in repeated mentions of various symbols of the Motherland in poetry: this is the Lermontic poems about Oak, and Esenin's addiction to the description of Bereza, and the leitmotif of Russia in the work of the block. The author accents the attention of the reader is not the fact that the foundation of love for the native nature was the children's impressions that only fixed over time.

So, the position of the author is expressed clearly. Mainly, he transmits it through a judgment: "If any fantastic mind could trace and find a connection of phenomena, he would see that every feature of the character of an adult, every quality of his soul was sown in childhood and have their germ since then , your seed. "

I partially divide the author's point of view on this problem. After all, in the life of everyone there is a place for an event that can fully change the worldview, a look at life, character. An event that can incorporate the idea that the perception of the past was erroneous.

A striking example of this is the story of V. Hugo "Rejected". She tells the story of the thief, at one moment he experienced genuine rebirth. The act of the priest, who justified him before the police, is stunning the hero, after which he becomes an honest and decent person.

In the work of the "Fate of Man", Mikhail Sholokhov also illuminates the problem of the case of the case in human life. Andrei Sokolov, who lost all those close in the war, is called the father of the orphan boy. Love, the desire to do good allows him to fight with the despair, life difficulties, changes his views on the current situation. Roman-Epopea L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace" proves once again that a person is able to change contrary to the established polls and habits.

Thus, the nature of each of us harde the difficulties arising from life path. Therefore, sometimes the impression of the present may affect the person much stronger than the impressions of childhood.

(Borisova Olga, 2014)

I read an excerpt from the story of the Russian Soviet writer Alexey Silantyevich Novikov Syntove, in which the author affects the problem of the courage of the Russian people.

So, at the beginning of the essay, we formulated one of the problems that the author reflected on which the author of the text was thought. Then in the comments, we showed exactly how this problem is revealed in the source text. The next step is to identify the position of the author.

Remember that if the problem of text is some question, the author's position is the answer to the question in the text, then what the author sees the solution to the problem.

If this does not happen, the logic of the presentation of thought in the composition is violated.

The author's position manifests itself, first of all, in relation to the author to the depicted phenomena, events, heroes and their actions. Consequently, reading the text, pay attention to the language means, in which the author's attitude is expressed to the subject of the image (see the table on the next page).

When identifying a copyright position, it is important to take into account that the text can use such a reception as irony - the use of words or expressions in such a context, which gives the word (expression) to the opposite value. As a rule, irony is a condemnation under the guise of praise: My God, what are the wonderful positions and services! How they rise and delight the soul! But, alas! I do not serve and deprive the pleasure to see a subtle handling of my chiefs (N. Gogol). Literal reading of ironic statements leads to a distorted understanding of the content of the text and the author's plan.

In addition, provinging his point of view, many authors are repelled from various statements of their real or possible opponents, i.e., they do not agree with which they disagree: "Take care of the honor", - bequeathed Pushkin in his " Captain's daughter" "What for?" - asks another modern "ideologist" of our market life. Why take care of the goods on which there is a demand: if I pay well for this very "honor", then I will sell it (S. Kudryashov). Unfortunately, students often attribute similar statements to the author himself, which leads to an incorrect understanding of the author's position.

For example, in the text below, V. Belova, the author's position is not expressed verbally and can be detected only with the attentive reading of the fragment and comparative analysis All of its parts.

Everything is already recognized two weeks after returning to the native village, everything is offended, negotiated almost with everyone. And only on my own home I try not to look and go around him. I think: Why Bedit Past? Why remember what is forgotten by even my countrymen? Everything went forever - good and bad, "bad it is not a pity, but you will not return good. I will irrigate from the heart. This is the past, never return to him.

It is necessary to be modern.

We must be ruthless to the past.

Pretty walking on the ashes of Timonihi, sit on coppers. It must be remembered that day and night on Earth - as Hikmet said - reactors and phazotrons work. That one counting machine acts faster than a million collective farm accounts that ...

In general, it is not necessary to look at the native house, you do not need to go there, nothing needs.

But once I mock my wrist on my fist and throw a corner. Run on the stairs. In Wans, look around.

Our house was outstanding down, to the river. As in a dream, I come to our birches. Hello. Didn't you know me? High steel. The bark burst in many places. Ants run on the trunk. The lower branches are cut down, so as not to obscure the windows of the winter hut. The vertex became above the pipe. Please do, please, jacket. When I was looking for you with my brother Yurka, you were silent, thin. I remember, there was spring and your leaves already crumpled. They could be counted, so Mala you were then. My brother and I found you in Skirt on Vakhrunskaya Mountain. I remember cuckoo cuckoo. We cut the two big roots. Carried through the lava, and the brother said that you would dry, do not take care under the winter window. We planted, two buckets of water poured. True, after all, you barely survived, two summer leaves were small, pale. Brother was no longer at home when you strengthened and scored power. And where did you get this power under the winter window? It is necessary to wash so much! Already above the father's house.

It is necessary to be modern. And I'm pushing out of birch, as from a poisonous tree. (According to V. Belov)

At first glance, the author calls to abandon the past in favor of modernity: "We must be modern. We must be ruthless to the past. " However, the true attitude of the author to the past is manifested in its touching memories of Birch, who are essentially a live dialogue with a tree. We see that for external indifference ("you have to be modern. And I'm pushing out from birch, like a poisonous tree") is hidden by love for childhood, to the past, which is impossible to strike out human life.

For proper understanding of the text, it is also important to distinguish the concepts author and narrator (narrator). The author of the artwork can lead his story from his face or on behalf of someone from the characters. But the first person, on behalf of which the work is written, is still a narrator, even if the writer uses the pronoun "I": after all when the author creates work of fictionHe describes life, making his fiction, its estimates, its addiction, sympathy and antipathy. In any case, the sign of equality between the author and the hero-storyteller should not be put.

Such a mismatch can be detected, for example, in the following text.

I still remember this jar with ink. In the morning, she stood on the table near the father's drawings, and by noon on the sheet of Watman, from where a huge black blossom appeared, through which the results of painstaking weekly labor were vaguely disadvantaged ...

Sergey, tell me honestly: you shed out mascara? - Father asked strictly.

Not. It's not me.

Who is then?

I do not know ... Probably a cat.

Cat Mashka, Mine Friend, sat on the edge of the sofa and somehow frightened on us with his yellow eyes.

Well, you will have to punish it. From now on, the entrance to her house is ordered. Will live in Chulana. However, maybe it's still not to blame? - the father looked at me.

Honestly! I am here! - I replied, looking at him straight ...

After a couple of days, the Masha disappeared without a trace, apparently, did not bother the unfair exile from the house. Mom was saddened. Father never remembered this case. Forgot, probably. And I still wash my soccer ball from treacherous black spots ...

Then I was naive convinced: the relationship between people is most important, the main thing is not to upset the parents. As for the cat ... She's just an animal nor say nor thinking. And yet so far in any cat eyes seemed to me a dumb repro ... (Andreev)

The position of the author is not stated directly. However, in the thoughts of the hero about his act we hear the voice of the sick conscience. It is not by chance that the punishment of the cat is named unfair, and in cat eyes, Sergey reads "Majoy Ukore". Of course, the author condemns the hero, convincing us that it is dishonest and low with his guilt on another, especially on a defenseless creature that cannot answer and stand up for himself.

Typical structures

The author believes that ...
The author comes to the reader to the conclusion that ...
Arguing over the problem, the author comes to the following conclusion ...
The position of the author is such ...
The position of the author, as it seems to me, can be formulated as follows ...
The author calls us (what)
The author convinces us that ...
The author condemns (who / what, for what)
The author's attitude to the problem is ambiguous.
The main goal of the author is that ...
Although the author's position is not expressed clearly, the logic of the text convinces that ...

Typical errors in formulating the position of the author

Advice

1) Typically, the position of the author is contained in the final part of the text, which the author summarizes the result, reflects on the events given above the events, actions of heroes, etc.
2) Pay attention to the estimated vocabulary of the text, lexical reasons, introductory words, exclamation and motivating proposals - all these means of expressing author's position.
3) The formulation of the position of the author must allocate its essay in a separate paragraph.
4) Try to formulate copyright In your own words, avoiding complex metaphors.
5) When quoting, select offers in which the author's thought is pronounced and clear if possible. (Remember that not in any text you can find quotes, exactly expressing the opinion of the author!)

What does the expert check?

The expert verifies the ability to adequately perceive and correctly formulate the position of the author: a positive, negative, neutral, double, etc. Attitude towards the told, proposed by the author's response to the questions set by him in the text.

1 point is set by an expert if you correctly formulated the position of the author of the original text on the commented problem and did not allow actual errors associated with the understanding of the position of the author of the source text.

Practice

Before me article russian writer, Philologist and journalist Zakhar Prilepina, in which the problem of true beauty rises.

Revealing this problem, the author argues over the attitude of people of modern society to such concepts as image, glamor and comfort. Zakhar Prilepin is indignant about the fact that a person, forgetting about the fact that genuine beauty is actually, turned it into his own "servant."

On the example of Helen Kuragina from the novel L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace" you can make sure that the excellent appearance of a person can hide cruelty, calcability and neglected egoism. Each of her act says that Helen take care only about himself. She should not lie anything to people, hiding behind with her excellent appearance. She is even ready to go to betrayal her husband.

Let us turn to the novel by F.M.Dostoevsky "Crime and Punishment". Sonya Marmeladova, the soul of which radiates kindness and love, is engaged in humiliating work in order to help his family survive. Not extremely attractive, untidy, in dirty clothes, she is not used to hitting her external beauty. But the beauty of her soul could not overshadow nothing. Sonya becomes a spiritual instructor Skolnikov, helps him to find peace and peace, stand on the path of truth. Readers of the novel remains no doubt about the truth of the beauty of this girl.

Summing up the foregoing, it can be concluded that the world can save only true beauty, which is very important to be able to distinguish from illusions and deception.

Option 2.

How many disputes about beauty? People over time changed their representation of this concept. And what about true human beauty? It is such a problem that raises Zakhar Prilepin in the text. The question of the true beauty of a person cannot leave anyone indifferent, he is more or less concerned with each of us. The problem nominated by Zakhar Prilepin is particularly relevant today, because people in our time make up an erroneous beauty judgment. The narrator argues over the question raised by them not detained, his interest is that he writes about. This is noticeable in his bold arguments. The author says that people began to use the beauty as it is convenient to them, turning meanness and vulgarity inside out, making beautiful any weaknesses and dimensions. Arguing over true human beauty, the writer mentions the words of Fedor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky that the beauty will save the world. And adds from himself that it was not about external A, the author convinces us that the true human beauty is in inner beauty. The thought, expressed by Z. Perelepin, is close and understandable to me. Probably, each of us had to think about such a question. Personally, in my opinion, for people inner beauty is more important, despite the overestimated value of beauty external. In this convinced classic literature. So for example, in the fairy tale of "Beauty and the Beast" Charles Perro, we show a wonderful history of love. Beauty, despite the fact that her satellite was externally similar to the monster, still fell in love with him. And mystically saved him from curse. And as I suppose, in this main role played beauty inner. From personal experience I would like to note the fact that the person is not always that the outside will be the same inside. After all, when you get closer with a person, you communicate with him, you start friendship, you no longer care how it looks. And often it happens that the one who is not beautiful outward, actually turns out to be good and interesting person. Thus, we are convinced that true human beauty has nothing like the beauty of the soul.

Updated: 2017-04-09

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl + Enter..
Thus, we will have the invaluable benefit of the project and other readers.

Thanks for attention.