I. Vladimir Dubrovsky's protest against lawlessness and injustice. Peasant riot
Conversation
We talk about textbook questions for the chapters that were assigned to read at home (p., Part 1).
If chapter III has been read and commented on in the previous lesson, we begin the conversation on questions with chapter IV. It is important that students master the work with the text, learn to confirm their thoughts with quotes.
How did Troekurov take the news of taking possession of the estate?
Troekurov was embarrassed: “By nature, he was not greedy, the desire for revenge lured him too far, his conscience murmured. He knew the condition of his opponent, an old comrade of his youth, and the victory did not please his heart.

What opposing feelings did Troekurov experience?"Satisfied vengeance and lust for power drowned out to some extent nobler feelings, but the latter finally triumphed."
- Why did the reconciliation of former friends turn out to be impossible?
The remorse that Troekurov experienced came too late.

Chapter V
After the death of his father, Vladimir Dubrovsky felt spiritual grief. Pushkin writes that Vladimir's face was terrible, that he could neither cry nor pray. The author does not directly name the feelings that the young man experienced, but we can assume that he hardened, that he experienced a feeling of wounded pride and a desire to avenge the death of his father. Christianity orders to forgive its enemies, but Vladimir Dubrovsky did not want to forgive Troekurov and therefore could not pray.
- Find and read the episode in which the feelings of Vladimir Dubrovsky are revealed. What technique does the author use to describe the state of the hero?
Pushkin conveys Dubrovsky's experiences with the help of a description of the thicket where he went after the funeral. Vladimir walked more often, not understanding the road, "... the branches constantly touched and scratched him, his legs constantly got stuck in the swamp, he did not notice anything."
Just as Dubrovsky could not make out the roads in the thicket, so he could not make out his confused feelings: “... thoughts one another were more gloomy in his soul ... He strongly felt his loneliness.”
- In the passage describing Vladimir in the thicket of the forest, find epithets. How do they help the reader understand the state of the hero?(From the words: "Finally he reached ..." to "He strongly felt his loneliness.")
- How do the judicial officials who came to “take possession” of Troekurov behave?(2nd question of the textbook.)
Judicial officials, representatives of the law, who came to "put into possession" of Troekurov, behave defiantly. They allow shameless statements about Dubrovsky, threaten his peasants, because they feel behind their backs the strength and power, backed up by Troekurov's money.
The anger and indignation of the peasants grows gradually, but the peasants experience particular indignation when an official insults Dubrovsky himself, the master and the rightful owner of the estate, and inspires the peasants that their master is Troekurov. First, a voice from the crowd answers the officials, then a murmur rises in the crowd, it intensifies and turns into the most terrible cries. The crowd is moving.
- Find and read the remark "voices from the crowd", the police officer's answer to it and the objection of the same voice. Why was the police officer so indignant at the words of the peasant?
Why doesn't Vladimir Dubrovsky give the angry peasants the opportunity to deal with officials?(4th question of the textbook.)
Vladimir Dubrovsky does not allow angry peasants to deal with officials, because he does not want to become a toy in the hands of a crowd of peasants, does not want to become an accomplice in the massacre and hopes for the justice of the king.

Chapter VI
Vladimir Dubrovsky came to the decision to burn down the “sad house” after he saw the portrait of his mother in a new way, read her letters to his father, where she talked about her little son, and heard the voices of clerks who demanded one or the other, with their presence and behavior desecrating the bright memory of Dubrovsky's father and mother. Let's help schoolchildren see the antithesis in the second paragraph of the chapter: "the world of family happiness", which Dubrovsky plunged into while reading his mother's letters, is opposed to reality, in which Vladimir Dubrovsky sees the trampled honor of his father and the defiant behavior of clerks.
- What prompted the peasants to join Dubrovsky?(2nd question of the textbook.)
The peasants joined Dubrovsky because they were outraged that they were going to be commanded and disposed not by natural nobles (whose right to own land and people they considered unshakable), but by clerks, people of ignoble origin. Arkhip the blacksmith says: "... have you heard the case, the clerks have planned to own us, the clerks are driving our masters from the manor's court ..." The peasants perceived the insult inflicted on their master as their own insult.
Why does the blacksmith Arkhip destroy clerks, but at the risk of own life save the cat?(3rd question of the textbook.)
The 3rd question is quite difficult. The blacksmith Arkhip destroys the clerks, but at the risk of his life he saves the cat from the roof of the burning barn. He tells the children who laugh at the miserable animal: “You are not afraid of God: God’s creature is dying, and you are foolishly rejoicing ...” Arkhip perceives the cat as God’s creature, saving which will be a matter pleasing to God, but he does not perceive clerks as people, worthy of salvation: in his understanding, they violated the law established by God and the king. Helping Troekurov to administer an unjust judgment, they violated God's commandments: they helped one person steal property from another, they lied and violated the oath, according to which they were obliged to tell the truth.
Let's pay attention to speech characteristic Arkhip the blacksmith in his conversation with Egorovna:
“Arkhipushka,” Yegorovna told him, “save them, the damned, God will reward you.
“How not so,” answered the blacksmith.
Where have we heard these words before?
Let us conclude that in the scene with the clerks (Chapter V) the "voice from the crowd" belonged to the blacksmith.
Consider the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate” (p. 93 of the textbook).
— Make up a story based on this picture.
In the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate”, a young gentleman Vladimir Andreevich Dubrovsky is depicted in the center of the drawing. He seemed to have just brought a torch to the hay, which flared up brightly; "The flames went up and lit up the whole house." Dubrovsky took off his cap, saying goodbye to his home, and looks at the fire. To his left, leaning on his arm, is the nanny Orina Egorovna Buzyreva, in a white scarf and apron, her head sadly bowed. Behind it we recognize the figures of the Dubrovsky serfs: the coachman Anton with black hair and a beard, the fair-haired Grisha, the son of Yegorovna, and behind the figure of Anton the blacksmith Arkhip, who locked the clerks with a key, but at the risk of his life saved the cat from the roof of the burning barn .
On the left we see the fire of the fire. Tongues of flame reach out towards Dubrovsky. Horses stand in the background, above a group of people, sparks from a fire fly up to a black sky.
The whole figure of Dubrovsky expresses pride and a sense of inner dignity. The figures of serfs express a gloomy determination to follow their proud master: "...we will die, we will not leave you, we will go with you."

Conversation

We talk about the questions of the textbook for the chapters that were assigned to read at home (pp. 146-147, part 1).

If chapter III has been read and commented on in the previous lesson, we begin the conversation on questions with chapter IV. It is important that students master the work with the text, learn to confirm their thoughts with quotes.

How did Troekurov take the news of taking possession of the estate?

Troekurov was embarrassed: “By nature, he was not greedy, the desire for revenge lured him too far, his conscience murmured. He knew the condition of his opponent, an old comrade of his youth, and the victory did not please his heart.

What opposing feelings did Troekurov experience? "Satisfied vengeance and lust for power drowned out to some extent nobler feelings, but the latter finally triumphed."

Why reconciliation of former friends was impossible?

The remorse that Troekurov experienced came too late.

Chapter V

After the death of his father, Vladimir Dubrovsky felt spiritual grief. Pushkin writes that Vladimir's face was terrible, that he could neither cry nor pray. The author does not directly name the feelings that the young man experienced, but we can assume that he hardened, that he experienced a feeling of wounded pride and a desire to avenge the death of his father. Christianity orders to forgive its enemies, but Vladimir Dubrovsky did not want to forgive Troekurov and therefore could not pray.

Find and read the episode in which the feelings of Vladimir Dubrovsky are revealed. What technique does the author use to describe the state of the hero?

Pushkin conveys Dubrovsky's experiences with the help of a description of the thicket where he went after the funeral. Vladimir walked more often, not understanding the road, "... the branches constantly touched and scratched him, his legs constantly got stuck in the swamp, he did not notice anything."

Just as Dubrovsky could not make out the roads in the thicket, so he could not make out his confused feelings: “... thoughts one another were more gloomy in his soul ... He strongly felt his loneliness.”

In the passage describing Vladimir in the middle of the forest, find epithets. How do they help the reader understand the state of the hero? (From the words: "Finally he reached ..." to "He strongly felt his loneliness.")

How do the officials of the judiciary behave when they come to "take possession" of Troyekurov? (2nd question of the textbook.)

Judicial officials, representatives of the law, who came to "put into possession" of Troekurov, behave defiantly. They allow shameless statements about Dubrovsky, threaten his peasants, because they feel behind their backs the strength and power, backed up by Troekurov's money.

The anger and indignation of the peasants grows gradually, but the peasants experience particular indignation when an official insults Dubrovsky himself, the master and the rightful owner of the estate, and inspires the peasants that their master is Troekurov. First, a voice from the crowd answers the officials, then a murmur rises in the crowd, it intensifies and turns into the most terrible cries. The crowd is moving.

Why does Vladimir Dubrovsky not give the angry peasants the opportunity to deal with the officials? (4th question of the textbook.)

Vladimir Dubrovsky does not allow angry peasants to deal with officials, because he does not want to become a toy in the hands of a crowd of peasants, does not want to become an accomplice in the massacre and hopes for the justice of the king.

Chapter VI

Vladimir Dubrovsky came to the decision to burn down the “sad house” after he saw the portrait of his mother in a new way, read her letters to his father, where she talked about her little son, and heard the voices of clerks who demanded one or the other, with their presence and behavior desecrating the bright memory of Dubrovsky's father and mother. Let's help schoolchildren see the antithesis in the second paragraph of the chapter: "the world of family happiness", which Dubrovsky plunged into while reading his mother's letters, is opposed to reality, in which Vladimir Dubrovsky sees the trampled honor of his father and the defiant behavior of clerks.

What prompted the peasants to join Dubrovsky? (2nd question of the textbook.)

The peasants joined Dubrovsky because they were outraged that they were going to be commanded and disposed not by natural nobles (whose right to own land and people they considered unshakable), but by clerks, people of ignoble origin. Arkhip the blacksmith says: "... have you heard the case, the clerks have planned to own us, the clerks are driving our masters from the manor's court ..." The peasants perceived the insult inflicted on their master as their own insult.

Why does the blacksmith Arkhip destroy the clerks, but saves the cat at the risk of his own life? (3rd question of the textbook.)

The 3rd question is quite difficult for sixth graders. The blacksmith Arkhip destroys the clerks, but at the risk of his life he saves the cat from the roof of the burning barn. He tells the children who laugh at the miserable animal: “You are not afraid of God: God’s creature is dying, and you are foolishly rejoicing ...” Arkhip perceives the cat as God’s creature, saving which will be a matter pleasing to God, but he does not perceive clerks as people, worthy of salvation: in his understanding, they violated the law established by God and the king. Helping Troekurov to administer an unjust judgment, they violated God's commandments: they helped one person steal property from another, they lied and violated the oath, according to which they were obliged to tell the truth.

Let us pay attention to the speech characteristics of Arkhip the blacksmith in his conversation with Egorovna:

“Arkhipushka,” Yegorovna told him, “save them, damned ones, God will reward you.

How not so, - answered the blacksmith.

Where have we heard these words before?

Let us conclude that in the scene with the clerks (Chapter V) the "voice from the crowd" belonged to the blacksmith.

Consider the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate” (p. 93 of the textbook).

- Make up a story based on this picture.

In the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate”, a young gentleman Vladimir Andreevich Dubrovsky is depicted in the center of the drawing. He seemed to have just brought a torch to the hay, which flared up brightly; "The flames went up and lit up the whole house." Dubrovsky took off his cap, saying goodbye to his home, and looks at the fire. To his left, leaning on his arm, is the nanny Orina Egorovna Buzyreva, in a white scarf and apron, her head sadly bowed. Behind it we recognize the figures of the Dubrovsky serfs: this is the coachman Anton with black hair and a beard, the fair-haired Grisha, the son of Yegorovna, and - behind the figure of Anton - the blacksmith Arkhip, who locked the clerks with a key, but at the risk of his life saved the cat from the roof of the burning barn .

On the left we see the fire of the fire. Tongues of flame reach out towards Dubrovsky. Horses stand in the background, above a group of people, sparks from a fire fly up to a black sky.

The whole figure of Dubrovsky expresses pride and a sense of inner dignity. The figures of serfs express a gloomy determination to follow their proud master: "...we will die, we will not leave you, we will go with you."

Chapter I

What gave Troekurov "great weight in the provinces"?

How do you understand the expression big weight in the provinces?

How can one explain the rudeness and willfulness of Troekurov? (2nd question of the textbook).

Choose a quote that matches the drawing by B. M. Kustodiev (p. 68 of the textbook).

Chapter II

"Dubrovsky's sudden madness had a strong effect" on Troekurov's imagination and "poisoned his triumph" because he did not manage to see how Dubrovsky was humiliated. He went mad, but his pride and honor were not broken.

I. Father and son

Commented reading

Reading the description of Pokrovsky and Kistenevka, we ask:

Homework

Individual task

Prepare an expressive reading of chapter VIII.

Lesson 23

Protest by Vladimir Dubrovsky against lawlessness and injustice.

Peasant riot

Conversation

We talk about the questions of the textbook for the chapters that were assigned to read at home (pp. 146-147, part 1).

If chapter III has been read and commented on in the previous lesson, we begin the conversation on questions with chapter IV. It is important that students master the work with the text, learn to confirm their thoughts with quotes.

What opposing feelings did Troekurov experience? "Satisfied vengeance and lust for power drowned out to some extent nobler feelings, but the latter finally triumphed."

The remorse that Troekurov experienced came too late.

Chapter V

Just as Dubrovsky could not make out the roads in the thicket, so he could not make out his confused feelings: “... thoughts one another were more gloomy in his soul ... He strongly felt his loneliness.”

In the passage describing Vladimir in the middle of the forest, find epithets. How do they help the reader understand the state of the hero? (From the words: "Finally he reached ..." to "He strongly felt his loneliness.")

How do the officials of the judiciary behave when they come to "take possession" of Troyekurov? (2nd question of the textbook.)

Why does Vladimir Dubrovsky not give the angry peasants the opportunity to deal with the officials? (4th question of the textbook.)

Vladimir Dubrovsky does not allow angry peasants to deal with officials, because he does not want to become a toy in the hands of a crowd of peasants, does not want to become an accomplice in the massacre and hopes for the justice of the king.

Chapter VI

Vladimir Dubrovsky came to the decision to burn down the “sad house” after he saw the portrait of his mother in a new way, read her letters to his father, where she talked about her little son, and heard the voices of clerks who demanded one or the other, with their presence and behavior desecrating the bright memory of Dubrovsky's father and mother. Let's help schoolchildren see the antithesis in the second paragraph of the chapter: "the world of family happiness", which Dubrovsky plunged into while reading his mother's letters, is opposed to reality, in which Vladimir Dubrovsky sees the trampled honor of his father and the defiant behavior of clerks.

What prompted the peasants to join Dubrovsky? (2nd question of the textbook.)

Why does the blacksmith Arkhip destroy the clerks, but saves the cat at the risk of his own life? (3rd question of the textbook.)

The 3rd question is quite difficult for sixth graders. The blacksmith Arkhip destroys the clerks, but at the risk of his life he saves the cat from the roof of the burning barn. He tells the children who laugh at the miserable animal: “You are not afraid of God: God’s creature is dying, and you are foolishly rejoicing ...” Arkhip perceives the cat as God’s creature, saving which will be a matter pleasing to God, but he does not perceive clerks as people, worthy of salvation: in his understanding, they violated the law established by God and the king. Helping Troekurov to administer an unjust judgment, they violated God's commandments: they helped one person steal property from another, they lied and violated the oath, according to which they were obliged to tell the truth.

How not so, - answered the blacksmith.

Where have we heard these words before?

Consider the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate” (p. 93 of the textbook).

Make up a story based on this picture.

The whole figure of Dubrovsky expresses pride and a sense of inner dignity. The figures of serfs express a gloomy determination to follow their proud master: "...we will die, we will not leave you, we will go with you."

II.Commented reading
Chapter VII

Pupils read chapter VII.

Commenting on the chapter, let's say that Vladimir Dubrovsky was forced to become a robber by the death of his father and the lack of means of subsistence, but main reason in the fact that, knowing the greed and venality of officials, he lost hope in a fair court decision and did not even hope to find protection from the tsar, because money was needed for this, but Dubrovsky did not have it.
Chapter VIII

The student who completed the individual task reads expressively chapter VIII or the episode "Deforge in the bear's room" (from the words: "In the courtyard of Kirila Petrovich ...").

What qualities did Desforges show in the bear room?

What fact made an indelible impression on Marya Kirilovna? How has Marya Kirilovna's attitude towards Deforge changed?
Homework

Prepare an expressive reading of chapters IX-XI. Answer the textbook questions for the relevant chapters (pp. 147-148).

Lesson 24

The surrounding nobility visiting Troekurov. Despotism of the master

disrespect for human personality. cowardice, servility,

the greed of Anton Pafnutich Spitsyn. Composition
I. The surrounding nobility visiting Troekurov. Despotism of the owner, disrespect for the human person
Chapter IX

The lesson starts with expressive reading chapter IX. Then we talk about:

How does Spitsyn explain his lateness?

What act does Spitsyn consider to be an act "according to conscience and justice"? What really motivated Anton Pafnutich?

How does the owner behave during dinner? Pay attention to his dialogue with the police officer.

What qualities does Troekurov show during dinner?

We will help schoolchildren to answer that Troekurov treats his guests rudely and arbitrarily, mocks them, humiliates their human dignity (“We know you; where do you spend money, you live at home as a pig as a pig ...”).

“The police officer got scared, bowed, smiled, stammered, and finally said:

Let's try, Your Excellency"?

Compare the stories of Spitsyn and Globovoy. What characteristic of Dubrovsky does each of them give?

Anton Pafnutich Spitsyn in his story says about Dubrovsky: "He is not a small mistake, he will not let anyone down, and he will probably tear off two skins from me."

Anna Savishna Globova does not give a direct description of Dubrovsky, but retells the words of the visiting general: “... Dubrovsky does not attack everyone, but famous rich people, but even here he shares with them, and does not rob completely, and no one accuses him of murders. ..” Globova says: “I guessed who His Excellency was, there was nothing for me to talk to him.” But in the words of the landowner, one can feel some sympathy and respect for the person who exposed the trickery of the clerk and thus returned her money.

The author introduces the stories of Spitsyn and Globova into the narrative in order to show the idea that the surrounding landowners had about Dubrovsky, to express the conflicting feelings of people about the robber involuntarily, to more fully present the appearance of the protagonist to readers. The author uses the antithesis to show the cowardice of Anton Pafnutich and the dignified behavior of Anna Savishna.

What did Troekurov say when the police officer read Dubrovsky's signs? Why did Troekurov come to this conclusion?

What qualities did Dubrovsky show during the festive dinner in Pokrovsky? Why didn't any of the guests guess that Deforge was Dubrovsky?

None of Troekurov's guests guessed that Deforge was Dubrovsky, because no one could even expect that Troekurov's enemy would be at his house in the role of a French teacher. Dubrovsky did not give himself away. He did not react to stories about himself and spoke only with Sasha and only in French. No one even suspected that he knew Russian.

II. Cowardice, servility, greed Anton Pafnutich Spitsyn
Chapter X

What did Troekurov do when some of the guests wanted to go home?

How has the character of the evening changed since Troyekurov left?

Why did Spitsyn decide to spend the night with Deforge? Pupils read expressively chapter X (from the words "Coming to the wing ..." to the end).

What qualities of his character does Anton Pafnutich show?
III. Composition

Chapter XI

How did Dubrovsky become Deforge?

Let the students briefly answer this question.

Dubrovsky at the post station met a Frenchman who was on his way to Troekurov's to serve as a teacher at little Sasha. Dubrovsky offered the Frenchman money to give him all the documents and immediately left for France. The French agreed. So Dubrovsky became Deforge.

During his stay at the Troekurov estate, Dubrovsky showed restraint, composure, acting qualities, nobility and self-control.

Why did A. S. Pushkin violate the sequence of presentation?

Pushkin broke the sequence of events so that the reader feels like a dinner guest who listens to talk about Dubrovsky and does not know that he is sitting next to him; so that the reader experiences the same surprise as Anton Pafnutich, who is deprived of his precious bag. Pushkin wanted to create a mystery, intrigue, and he succeeded.
Homework

Draw up (in writing) a plan of the main events of chapters VIII-XI. Read chapter XII.

Lesson 25

Composition. Plot. romantic story love of Vladimir and Masha
I. Composition. Plot

Let's ask the student to write on the blackboard the plan of events drawn up at home for chapters VIII-XI.

Plan of the main events of chapters VIII-XI

1) The French teacher arrived in Pokrovskoye.

2) Kirila Petrovich's conversation with a Frenchman.

3) "Noble amusements of the Russian master."

4) Deforge kills the bear.

5) "... The guests began to arrive."

6) Festive dinner at Pokrovsky.

7) The stories of Spitsyn and Globovoy.

8) Signs of Dubrovsky.

9) The end of the holiday.

10) Anton Pafnutich goes to bed in Dubrovsky's room.

11) Deforge-Dubrovsky robs Spitsyn.

12) The French teacher is waiting for the horses in the caretaker's house.

13) Dubrovsky buys documents from a Frenchman.

14) Dubrovsky, with the Frenchman's papers, comes to Troekurov and becomes Sasha's teacher.

15) Morning departure of the robbed Spitsyn.

Working collectively, to the right of the records with numbers (colored pencil or green pen) we denote the true course of events.

We have restored plot of the work.

* Plot - the sequence and connection of events in a work of art.

Pushkin breaks the temporal sequence of events in order to create a mystery, intrigue, and arouse intense interest in readers.

We read the article of the textbook "Composition" (pp. 149-150). We write out the definition of composition.

* Composition - this construction artwork, location and interconnection of all its parts, images, episodes.
II. Romantic love story of Vladimir and Masha

Why did Dubrovsky look for opportunities to settle in Troekurov's house and abandoned his plans for revenge?

Remember how Masha first treated Deforge. Why?

What event made her change her attitude towards the teacher?

How did she feel when she received the note from Desforges?

How did Masha think through her behavior on a date? Did she manage to behave the way she wanted?

Find the words of Dubrovsky explaining the refusal of revenge.

“I realized that the house where you live is sacred, that not a single creature connected with you by ties of blood is subject to my curse. I have given up vengeance as madness."

What promise did Marya Kirilovna give to Dubrovsky?

Sixth graders may not immediately understand what it means to promise not to reject devotion. Tell them about what medieval Europe there was a tradition of chivalrous service to his lady, not demanding anything from her, except that the lady accepted the devotion of her knight. Dubrovsky understands that Marya Kirilovna cannot become his wife. He only wants to serve her and asks her not to reject his help. This is the kind of love we call now romantic.

Why was Dubrovsky forced to flee Pokrovsky?

How did Troekurov part with his guests?

Let's ask the students to remember how Troekurov ordered the gates to be locked so that the guests could not go home on the day of the temple feast in Pokrovsky. Let's compare this act with how Troekurov at eleven o'clock, being out of sorts, dispersed the guests to their homes. Let us draw a conclusion about Troekurov's despotism and tyranny.
Homework

Lesson 26

Image of the Russian nobility. Troekurov and the prince

Vereisky. The fate of Marya Kirilovna and Dubrovsky
I. Image of the Russian nobility. Troekurov and Prince Vereisky. The fate of Marya Kirilovna

A.S. Pushkin is the greatest, brilliant Russian poet and playwright. In many of his works, the problem of the existence of serfdom can be traced. The issue of the relationship between landlords and peasants has always been controversial and caused a lot of controversy in the works of many authors, including Pushkin. So, in the novel "Dubrovsky" representatives of the Russian nobility are described by Pushkin vividly and clearly. A particularly prominent example is Kirila Petrovich Troekurov.

Kirila Petrovich Troekurov can be safely attributed to the image of a typical old Russian gentleman. He is a retired general-in-chief and the first hero we meet on the pages of the novel. This hero is rich, noble, influential person with a large number of connections in the provinces. As the author writes, from an early age Troekurov was spoiled by "everything that only surrounded him" and indulged impulses of waywardness. The neighbors around him are flatterers and saints who follow any whim and are ready to endure Troekurov's "violent entertainment".

When Pushkin describes Troekurov as a serf landowner - a rich man, he focuses on unlimited power over a person. Despite the strict and capricious treatment of peasants and courtyards, Troekurov's servants were proud of him for his wealth and power.

Troekurov is a person who loves to have fun. Almost all of his days are spent in search of entertainment, traveling around the domain, celebrating and feasting.

Kirila Petrovich does not deny himself anything, everything is permissible for him. He has no sense of proportion even in food.

This hero often commits rash, hasty acts in a fit of feelings, the result of which can be unexpected and unpleasant, causing rejection and hostility.

Troekurov's amusements for a sane person will seem far from reasonable and adequate. For many guests, a meeting with a bear becomes a terrifying and cruel torture. Troekurov, watching how a frightened and exhausted man goes crazy when he meets a bear one-on-one, feels extraordinary pleasure.

Everyone around was afraid of Troekurov, not only because of his power, but also the arrogant character corresponding to it. Troekurov showed a sense of respect only to one person. It was a retired lieutenant of the guard, fellow officer and neighbor Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky. Dubrovsky was distinguished by his "humble state", determination and impatience. In a sense, these two heroes were similar in character, and this is due to the fact that they were the same age, equally brought up in the same class. Their fates were also similar: both of them married for love, and both soon became widowers. The people around were at a loss and envied their friendship and harmony, but the case, misunderstanding and unwillingness to make concessions to each of the heroes destroyed not only their friendship, but also their lives.

Kirila Petrovich owned the best kennel in the area. He was proud of this and was ready to show off to the guest at an opportunity. Dubrovsky, once, being a guest at Troekurov's, noticed that it is unlikely that Troekurov's people live the same way as his dogs. To which one of Troekurov's servants said: "... it would not be bad for another and nobleman to exchange the estate for any local kennel", pointing to Dubrovsky and his modest wealth. This is where the quarrel began. Troekurov wished, in response to his friend's defense of his dignity, to show his strength by taking away Dubrovsky's estate. Taking advantage of his many connections, influence, power and dishonest ways, Troekurov embodied this idea, leaving the only real friend on the street.

The peasants of the village of Kistenevka, which belonged to Dubrovsky, stubbornly did not want to go into the possession of Troekurov. Pushkin points out that the Kistenev peasants never stood out for their benevolent attitude towards Troekurov because of his cruel treatment even of his own peasants. What can we say about strangers.

For example, he was not a mercenary person, and what he did in a fit of revenge awakened his conscience. Troekurov did not consider the case with former friend victorious, because he knew what state Dubrovsky could be in. These conscientious feelings directed him to the idea of ​​reconciliation. The hero followed her, but it was too late. Hatred, indignation and disappointment already lived in Dubrovsky's heart, which severely hit Dubrovsky's unhealthy state. This caused the death of the only person respected by Troekurov.

In relations with his daughter, the author describes the character of Troekurov no less vividly. Simultaneously with warm feelings for the daughter of Kiril Petrovich, he is also self-willed, sometimes cruel and harsh. Therefore, there is no mutual trust between the daughter Masha and the father. Instead of live communication with her father, Masha comes reading novels. Troyekurov shows indifference, coldness, and insensibility to the tears and pleas of his daughter not to marry her to an unloved old rich man. He is unwavering in his decision. For Troekurov, money is the main value and purpose of life, rather than the happiness of his daughter.

Troekurov - a feudal despot and wayward tyrant - a classic example of the Russian nobility. Pushkin showing him negative traits character, describes a negative attitude not to all landowners, but to cruel, despotic, limited tyrants-power-hungry.

Pushkin contrasts Troekurov with another hero of the work - the son of A. G. Dubrovsky - Vladimir. He is a passionate, impetuous, enthusiastic, decisive nature. This is a man who fights against landowners who abuse power, position and influence.

Despite the fact that the action of the novel takes place in the 1820s, this work is vital, vital and modern.

• The controversial and even somewhat scandalous story "Dubrovsky" was written by A. S. Pushkin in 1833. By that time, the author had already grown up, lived in a secular society, and became disillusioned with it and the existing state order. Many of his works, related to that time, were under censorship. And so Pushkin writes about a certain "Dubrovsky", a young, but already experienced, disappointed, but not broken by worldly "storms", a man of 23 years old. There is no point in retelling the plot - I read it and [...]
• Troyekurov Dubrovsky Quality of characters Negative hero Main positive hero Character Spoiled, selfish, dissolute. Noble, generous, determined. Has a hot temper. A person who knows how to love not for money, but for the beauty of the soul. Occupation Rich nobleman, spends his time in gluttony, drunkenness, leads a dissolute life. Humiliation of the weak brings him great pleasure. He has a good education, served as a cornet in the guard. After […]
• We learn about Anton Pafnutich Spitsyn closer to the middle of the story. He comes to Troekurov's temple feast and makes, it must be said, not the most favorable impression. Before us is a "fat man of about fifty", having a round and pockmarked face with a triple chin. Obsequiously, with a sycophantic smile, he “stumbled into the dining room”, apologizing and bowing. Here at the table we learn that he is not distinguished by courage. Spitsyn is afraid of the robbers who have already burned down his barn and are approaching the estate. Fear […]
• The romantic “noble” robber is an image that is well known in world literary practice. As a rule, they were outcast representatives of the nobility, treacherously deceived by friends or offended by a corrupt law. Pushkin's hero Vladimir Dubrovsky is one of such "noble" knights of the night. But he did not immediately become a robber. The reader knows that this young man was educated in the Cadet Corps, then served in the guards regiment of the city on the Neva. Like a typical […]
• The basis of the novel "Dubrovsky" by Pushkin was based on a case very characteristic of the relationship between the landowners that existed at that time. The more influential the landowner was, the more he was able to oppress his weaker, poorer neighbor, not to mention taking away his estate from him. Alexander Sergeevich was very concerned about the credibility of his novel. Everything characters novel "Dubrovsky" are divided as if into social classes, each with its own characteristics. For example, the landowner Troyekurov at first […]
• Spiritual beauty, sensuality, naturalness, simplicity, the ability to sympathize and love - these qualities of A.S. Pushkin endowed the heroine of his novel "Eugene Onegin", Tatyana Larina. A simple, outwardly unremarkable girl, but with a rich inner world, who grew up in a remote village, reads romance novels, loves the scary stories of the nanny and believes in legends. Her beauty is inside, she is deep and bright. The appearance of the heroine is compared to the beauty of her sister, Olga, but the latter, although beautiful on the outside, is not […]
• At the lesson of literature, we studied the poem by Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin "Ruslan and Lyudmila". This interesting work about the brave knight Ruslan and his beloved Lyudmila. At the beginning of the work, the evil sorcerer Chernomor kidnapped Lyudmila right from the wedding. Lyudmila's father, Prince Vladimir, ordered everyone to find their daughter and promised the savior half the kingdom. And only Ruslan went to look for his bride because he loved her very much. There are many in the poem fairytale heroes: Chernomor, sorceress Naina, magician Finn, talking head. And the poem begins […]
• Masha Mironova - daughter of the commandant Belogorsk fortress. This is an ordinary Russian girl, "chubby, ruddy, with light blond hair." By nature, she was cowardly: she was afraid even of a rifle shot. Masha lived rather closed, lonely; there were no suitors in their village. Her mother, Vasilisa Yegorovna, said about her: “Masha, a girl of marriageable age, and what kind of dowry does she have? - a frequent comb, yes a broom, and an altyn of money, with which to go to the bathhouse. Well, if there is good person, otherwise sit yourself in the girls of the age-old […]
• Pushkin's original intention with Eugene Onegin was to create a comedy similar to Griboedov's Woe from Wit. In the poet's letters one can find sketches for a comedy in which main character portrayed as a satirical character. In the course of work on the novel, which lasted more than seven years, the author's intentions changed significantly, as did his worldview as a whole. By genre nature, the novel is very complex and original. This is a "novel in verse". Works of this genre are found in other […]
• Eugene Onegin Vladimir Lensky The age of the hero More mature, at the beginning of the novel in verse and during the acquaintance and duel with Lensky he is 26 years old. Lensky is young, he is not yet 18 years old. Upbringing and education Received a home education, which was typical for most nobles in Russia. The teachers "did not bother with strict morality", "slightly scolded for pranks", but, more simply, spoiled the barchonka. He studied at the University of Göttingen in Germany, the birthplace of romanticism. In his intellectual baggage […]
• Pushkin's story "The Queen of Spades" is based on a real incident that happened to Prince Golitsyn. He lost at cards and came to ask his grandmother Natalya Petrovna Golitsyna for money. She did not give money, but she told a magical secret that helped Golitsyn win back. From this boastful story, told by a friend, Pushkin created a story containing a deep ethical meaning. The main face of the story is Hermann. In the story, he is compared with the whole society. He is prudent, ambitious and passionate. This is definitely […]
• This traditional theme excited such poets as Horace, Byron, Zhukovsky, Derzhavin and others. A. S. Pushkin used the best achievements of world and Russian literature in his poetry. This was most clearly manifested in the theme of the purpose of the poet and poetry. This issue is touched upon in the first published poem, "To a Poetic Friend" (1814). The poet speaks of the sorrows that fall to the lot of poets, who ... are praised by everyone, nourished - only by magazines; The wheel of Fortune rolls past their Fortune ... Their life is a series of […]
• Themes and Problems (Mozart and Salieri). "Little Tragedies" is a cycle of P-n's plays, including four tragedies: "The Miserly Knight", "Mozart and Salieri", "The Stone Guest", "Feast in the Time of Plague". All these works were written during the Boldin autumn (1830 This text is for private use only - 2005). "Little tragedies" is not Pushkin's name, it arose during publication and was based on P-n's phrase, where the phrase "little tragedies" was used in a literal sense. Author's titles […]
• Introduction Love lyrics occupies one of the main places in the work of poets, but the degree of its study is small. There are no monographic works on this topic; it is partially disclosed in the works of V. Sakharov, Yu.N. Tynyanov, D.E. Maksimov, they talk about it as a necessary component of creativity. Some authors (D.D. Blagoy and others) compare love theme in the work of several poets at once, describing some common features. A. Lukyanov considers the love theme in the lyrics of A.S. Pushkin through the prism of […]
• For Pushkin, the feeling of friendship is a great value, which is equal only to love, creativity and inner freedom. The theme of friendship runs through all the work of the poet, from the lyceum period to the end of his life. Being a lyceum student, Pushkin writes about friendship in the light of the "light poetry" of the French poet Parny. The poet's friendly lyceum lyrics are largely imitative and opposed to classicism. In the poem "To Students" a cheerful feast is poeticized, wine and the joy of a friendly carefree […]
• The theme of the poet and poetry excites all poets, since a person needs to understand who he is, what place he occupies in society, what his purpose is. Therefore, in the work of A.S. Pushkin and M.Yu. Lermontov, this topic is one of the leading ones. In order to consider the images of the poet from the two great Russian classics, you must first find out how they define the goal of their work. Pushkin writes in his poem "The Song of the Prophetic Oleg": Magi are not afraid of mighty lords, And they do not need a princely gift; True and […]
• A.S. Pushkin and M.Yu. Lermontov, outstanding poets of the first half of the 19th century. The main type of creativity for both poets is lyrics. In his poems, each of them described many topics, for example, the theme of love of freedom, the theme of the Motherland, nature, love and friendship, the poet and poetry. All Pushkin's poems are filled with optimism, belief in the existence of beauty on earth, bright colors in the depiction of nature, and Mikhail Yuryevich's theme of loneliness can be traced everywhere. Lermontov's hero is lonely, he is trying to find something in a foreign land. What […]
• Writing about Pushkin is a fascinating pastime. This name in Russian literature has acquired a lot of cultural layers (take, for example, literary anecdotes by Daniil Kharms or the film "Trilogy" by director-animator Andrei Yuryevich Khrzhanovsky based on Pushkin's drawings, or the opera "The Queen of Spades" by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky). However, our task is more modest, but no less interesting: to characterize the theme of the poet and poetry in his work. The poet's place modern life far less significant than in the nineteenth century. Poetry is […]
• Landscape poetry of Pushkin is rich and varied. It occupies an important place in the work of the poet. Pushkin saw nature with his soul, enjoyed its eternal beauty and wisdom, drew inspiration and strength from it. He was one of the first Russian poets who revealed to readers the beauty of nature and taught them to admire it. In merging with natural wisdom, Pushkin saw the harmony of the world. It is no coincidence that the poet's landscape lyrics are imbued with philosophical moods and reflections; one can trace its evolution over creative activity […]
• Having gone through many works by A.S. Pushkin, I accidentally stumbled upon the poem "God forbid I go crazy ...", and I was immediately attracted by a bright and emotional beginning that attracts the reader's attention. In this poem, which seems simple and clear and understandable, like many other works of the great classic, one can easily see the experiences of the creator, the true, free-minded poet - experiences and dreams of freedom. And at the time of writing this poem, freedom of thought and speech was severely punished […]

Lesson 1

Topic: On the creation of the novel "Dubrovsky". Historical and cultural context of time. Image of the Russian nobility.

Target: acquaintancewith the concept of "novel", with the history of the creation of the novel "Dubrovsky", with the historical features of that time, the development of t / h: literacy, expressiveness, fluency.

During the classes:
I.Introduction to the concept of romance.

novel - it's a big one epic work with a branched, unfolded plot, in which events take place over a significant period of time and in a wide artistic space.

II. About the creation of the novel "Dubrovsky" teacher's word
In 1826, in September, Pushkin was summoned by Tsar Nicholas II to Moscow. After a conversation with the poet, the tsar said that he was talking with "the smartest man in Russia." Pushkin was allowed to live in Moscow and even work in the archives. In the early thirties, the poet begins to write prose works. Pushkin worked on the novel "Dubrovsky" from October 1832 to February 1833. During the life of the creator, this novel was not published: Pushkin considered it unfinished.
The novel was based on Nashchokin's message to A.S. Pushkin “about a poor nobleman named Ostrovsky ... who had a lawsuit with a neighbor for land. He was ousted from the estate and, left with some peasants, began to rob ... "(P.I. Bartenev).Pushkin heard about such cases before. These facts were creatively comprehended by A. S. Pushkin in the novel "Dubrovsky".

III. Introduction to the historical and cultural context of time Conversation
With the help of questions, we activate the already existing knowledge of children about this era. Let's read the first line of the novel.
When does the novel take place?
It will be important for the teacher to indicate that the action takes place in the first half of the 19th century.
What was the society like at that time?
Autocracy, serfdom. Tsar; estates: nobles, officials, peasants - serfs and freemen. ( General representations.)
- What work about serfdom did we study in the 5th grade?
Recall "Muma" by I. S. Turgenev.
- What was the attitude of the lady towards her serfs? What was the relationship between the serfs? Remember how the old lady's hangers-on behaved.
- Remember the story of L. N. Tolstoy "Prisoner of the Caucasus." What class did Zhilin and Kostylin belong to?
Let us draw the attention of the children that both officers were noblemen, but Kostylin

was rich, and Zhilin was poor. The nobility was heterogeneous. The nobleman owned the estate, which consisted of land and serfs. Some nobles owned vast lands (estates) and a large number of peasants, the possessions of others were small.
Nobles could marry and marry only people from their class. Most of the nobles considered serfdom to be normal and disposed of their property as they saw fit (recall the tyranny of the mistress in Mumu). People who did not belong to noble families, they did not consider worthy of attention and respect. The nobles lived mainly on their estates, did housework and went to visit each other. The peasants called their master the word "master", the mistress - the lady, children - barchuks and barchats.

IV. Chapter I. Image of the Russian nobility
The teacher begins reading the novel to set the right tone for further work. It is good if the episode of the quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troekurov is read in the class (up to the words: “Walking with heavy steps back and forth around the hall ...”).

Homework
Read chapters I, II (pp. 165-175, part 1 of the textbook). Answer questions for these chapters (p. 240, v. 1,4,5). (textbook Merkin, "Literature Grade 6")

Lesson 2

Topic: Image of the Russian nobility. Dubrovsky Sr. and Troekurov. Father and son.

Target: consider in comparison two boyars the image of the Russian nobility, the development of t / h: literacy, expressiveness, fluency; develop the ability to work with text.

During the classes:

I. Image of the Russian nobility. Dubrovsky Sr. and Troekurov
Conversation
We talk on questions to the relevant chapters (p. 240 v. 1,4,5)
Chapter I
- What gave Troekurov "great weight in the provinces"?
"Wealth, a noble family and connections" gave Troekurov "great weight in the provinces."
- How do you understand the expression big weight in the provinces ?
- How can one explain the rudeness and willfulness of Troekurov? (2nd question of the textbook).
“The neighbors were glad to cater to his slightest whims; provincial officials trembled at his name; Kirila Petrovich accepted signs of servility as a proper tribute ... ”Troekurov’s rudeness and willfulness can be explained by great wealth and unlimited power over people. It can be said that he treated his guests in the same way as his serfs. He believed that he could buy everything, and humiliated the dignity of people.
We will ask the children to find the answers to the 3rd question of the textbook directly in the text:
- What kind of person was Kirila Petrovich at home? What did his usual “occupations” consist of?
“In domestic life, Kirila Petrovich showed all the vices of an uneducated person. Spoiled by everything that only surrounded him, he was used to giving full rein to all the impulses of his ardent disposition and all the undertakings of a rather limited mind. Troekurov drank every evening and suffered from gluttony twice a week. “Troekurov’s constant occupations consisted of traveling around his vast possessions, in lengthy feasts and pranks, moreover, invented daily ...”
- Describe two landlord neighbors, highlight their similarities and differences.
Troyekurov, "arrogant in dealings with people of the highest rank," respected Dubrovsky, because "he knew from experience the impatience and decisiveness of his character." Dubrovsky was the only one of the people around him who behaved proudly, was independent and refused the patronage of his former colleague.
Troekurov and Dubrovsky "partially resembled both in characters and inclinations." This similarity was manifested in pride, but Troekurov maintained this feeling in himself with an awareness of wealth and power, and Dubrovsky - with an awareness of the antiquity of his family and noble honor. Both landowners had a hot, quick-tempered character. Both loved dog hunting and kept dogs.
An incident in the kennel characterizes Dubrovsky as a proud man who does not want to turn into a jester who has a sense of his own dignity. Dubrovsky assessed the psar's remark as an insult to noble honor by a serf.
- What do you think, if Troekurov were visiting a richer and nobler person who would offend his dignity, how would Troekurov act in this case?
The quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troyekurov cannot be considered an “accidental incident”. It is natural, because Troekurov treated all his guests haughtily, and Dubrovsky could not endlessly be an exception to this rule.
- Choose a quote that matches the drawing by B. M. Kustodiev (p. 168 of the textbook).
- What method of revenge did Troekurov choose?
- What was the main law of Kirila Petrovich?
It is important that the students, answering this question, find the most expressive phrase that characterizes Troekurov: “That is the power to take away the estate without any right.”
- How did Shabashkin act on behalf of Troekurov?
Let us conclude that for the assessor, assistant judge, who was a representative of the law, money became the main law of life.

Chapter II
Officials of the district court met Dubrovsky and Troekurov in different ways. No one paid any attention to Dubrovsky. When Kirila Petrovich arrived, the clerks “got up and put the feathers behind his ear. Members greeted him with an expression of deep servility, moved him a chair out of respect for his rank, years and stoutness.
The picture of the court evokes a feeling of annoyance, pity for Dubrovsky, indignation against the triumph of Troekurov and protest against the servility and subservience of the judges. Pushkin emphasizes the unnaturalness of this trial with such details: the assessor addresses Troekurov with a low bow, and Dubrovsky is simply presented with a paper; At the same time, Troekurov is sitting in an armchair, and Dubrovsky is standing, leaning against the wall.
- Why does the author highlight a word in a phrase in a different font? "decision court"?
The author highlights the word in a different fontdecision,because he does not believe that the court decided anything at all.
"Dubrovsky's sudden madness had a strong effect" on Troekurov's imagination and "poisoned his triumph" because he did not manage to see how Dubrovsky was humiliated. He went mad, but his pride and honor were not broken.

I. Father and sonCommented reading Start reading from Chapter III: Pushkin's text will be read aloud by several students. Let's make the necessary comments.
Vladimir Dubrovsky led a life in St. Petersburg, in his opinion, a decent one for a Guards officer. His father sent him money, leaving almost nothing for himself, and Dubrovsky, a wasteful and ambitious young man, "allowed himself luxurious whims, played cards and entered into debts, not caring about the future." He hoped for his father and that he could find himself a rich bride.
Dubrovsky received the news of his father's illness "with unusual emotion." He was horrified by the situation of his father, and he "reproached himself for criminal negligence." Dubrovsky's character showed love for his family and readiness to help his father.
The dialogue between Vladimir Dubrovsky and the coachman Anton can be read by roles.
Yards and peasants did not like and were afraid of Troekurov. The coachman Anton told Dubrovsky that Troyekurov “has a bad time with his own people, but strangers will get it, so he will not only skin them, but even tear off the meat.”
Dubrovsky is a person who has a sense of his own dignity, and such a person will not humiliate the dignity of another. Dubrovsky was fair to his serfs, and they did not want another master.
Reading the description of Pokrovsky and Kistenevka, we ask :
- What technique does the author use when describing two manor estates?
- How did Dubrovsky Sr. meet his son?
Homework
Read chapters III-VI. Answer the textbook questions for these chapters (pp. 175-191).
Prepare a retelling of the episode "Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate".

Individual task ( Guk, Korovin, Abramova)
Prepare an expressive reading of chapter VIII.

Lesson 3

Topic: Protest by Vladimir Dubrovsky against lawlessness and injustice. Peasant riot .

Target: to teach how to work with text, the ability to confirm one's thoughts with quotes, to develop the ability to compose an oral story from an illustration,

During the classes:

I. Vladimir Dubrovsky's protest against lawlessness and injustice. Peasant riot Conversation
We talk about the questions of the textbook for the chapters that were assigned to be read at home (pp. 175 - 191, part 1).
We start the conversation with questions chapter IV. It is important that students master the work with the text, learn to confirm their thoughts with quotes.
- How did Troekurov take the news of taking possession of the estate?
Troekurov was embarrassed: “By nature, he was not greedy, the desire for revenge lured him too far, his conscience murmured. He knew the condition of his opponent, an old comrade of his youth, and the victory did not please his heart.
- What opposing feelings did Troekurov experience? "Satisfied vengeance and lust for power drowned out to some extent nobler feelings, but the latter finally triumphed."
- Why reconciliation of former friends was impossible?
The remorse that Troekurov experienced came too late.

Chapter V
After the death of his father, Vladimir Dubrovsky felt spiritual grief. Pushkin writes that Vladimir's face was terrible, that he could neither cry nor pray. The author does not directly name the feelings that the young man experienced, but we can assume that he hardened, that he experienced a feeling of wounded pride and a desire to avenge the death of his father. Christianity orders to forgive its enemies, but Vladimir Dubrovsky did not want to forgive Troekurov and therefore could not pray.
- Find and read the episode in which the feelings of Vladimir Dubrovsky are revealed. What technique does the author use to describe the state of the hero?
Pushkin conveys Dubrovsky's experiences with the help of a description of the thicket where he went after the funeral. Vladimir walked more often, not understanding the road, "... the branches constantly touched and scratched him, his legs constantly got stuck in the swamp, he did not notice anything."
Just as Dubrovsky did not make out the roads in the thicket, so he could not make out and

of his confused feelings: "... thoughts one another more gloomy were embarrassed in his soul ... He strongly felt his loneliness."
- In the passage describing Vladimir in the middle of the forest, find epithets. How do they help the reader understand the state of the hero? (From the words: "Finally he reached ..." to "He strongly felt his loneliness.")
- How do the officials of the judiciary behave when they come to "take possession" of Troyekurov? Judicial officials, representatives of the law, who came to "put into possession" of Troekurov, behave defiantly. They allow shameless statements about Dubrovsky, threaten his peasants, because they feel behind their backs the strength and power, backed up by Troekurov's money.
The anger and indignation of the peasants grows gradually, but the peasants experience particular indignation when an official insults Dubrovsky himself, the master and the rightful owner of the estate, and inspires the peasants that their master is Troekurov. First, a voice from the crowd answers the officials, then a murmur rises in the crowd, it intensifies and turns into the most terrible cries. The crowd is moving.
- Find and read the remark "voices from the crowd", the police officer's answer to it and the objection of the same voice. Why was the police officer so indignant at the words of the peasant?
- Why does Vladimir Dubrovsky not give the angry peasants the opportunity to deal with the officials? Vladimir Dubrovsky does not allow angry peasants to deal with officials, because he does not want to become a toy in the hands of a crowd of peasants, does not want to become an accomplice in the massacre and hopes for the justice of the king.

Chapter VI
Vladimir Dubrovsky came to the decision to burn down the “sad house” after he saw the portrait of his mother in a new way, read her letters to his father, where she talked about her little son, and heard the voices of clerks who demanded one or the other, with their presence and behavior desecrating the bright memory of Dubrovsky's father and mother.Let's help schoolchildren see the antithesis in the second paragraph of the chapter: The “world of family happiness” that Dubrovsky plunged into while reading his mother’s letters is contrasted with reality, in which Vladimir Dubrovsky sees the trampled honor of his father and the defiant behavior of clerks.
- What prompted the peasants to join Dubrovsky? The peasants joined Dubrovsky because they were outraged that they were going to be commanded and disposed not by natural nobles (whose right to own land and people they considered unshakable), but by clerks, people of ignoble origin. Arkhip the blacksmith says: "... have you heard the case, the clerks have planned to own us, the clerks are driving our masters from the manor's court ..." The peasants perceived the insult inflicted on their master as their own insult.
- Why does the blacksmith Arkhip destroy the clerks, but saves the cat at the risk of his own life? This question is difficult enough for

sixth graders. The blacksmith Arkhip destroys the clerks, but at the risk of his life he saves the cat from the roof of the burning barn. He tells the children who laugh at the miserable animal: “You are not afraid of God: God’s creature is dying, and you are foolishly rejoicing ...” Arkhip perceives the cat as God’s creature, saving which will be a matter pleasing to God, but he does not perceive clerks as people, worthy of salvation: in his understanding, they violated the law established by God and the king. Helping Troekurov to administer an unjust judgment, they violated God's commandments: they helped one person steal property from another, they lied and violated the oath, according to which they were obliged to tell the truth.
Let us pay attention to the speech characteristics of Arkhip the blacksmith in his conversation with Egorovna:
“Arkhipushka,” Yegorovna told him, “save them, damned ones, God will reward you.
- How not so, - answered the blacksmith.
- Where have we heard these words before?
Let us conclude that in the scene with the clerks (Chapter V) the "voice from the crowd" belonged to the blacksmith.
Consider the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate” (p. 190 of the textbook).
- Make up a story based on this picture. In the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate”, a young gentleman Vladimir Andreevich Dubrovsky is depicted in the center of the drawing. He seemed to have just brought a torch to the hay, which flared up brightly; "The flames went up and lit up the whole house." Dubrovsky took off his cap, saying goodbye to his home, and looks at the fire. To his left, leaning on his arm, is the nanny Orina Egorovna Buzyreva, in a white scarf and apron, her head sadly bowed. Behind it we recognize the figures of the Dubrovsky serfs: this is the coachman Anton with black hair and a beard, the fair-haired Grisha, the son of Yegorovna, and - behind the figure of Anton - the blacksmith Arkhip, who locked the clerks with a key, but at the risk of his life saved the cat from the roof of the burning barn .
On the left we see the fire of the fire. Tongues of flame reach out towards Dubrovsky. Horses stand in the background, above a group of people, sparks from a fire fly up to a black sky.
The whole figure of Dubrovsky expresses pride and a sense of inner dignity. The figures of serfs express a gloomy determination to follow their proud master: "...we will die, we will not leave you, we will go with you."

II.

Protest by Vladimir Dubrovsky against lawlessness and injustice. Peasant riot.

The purpose of the lesson: reveal the originality of V. Dubrovsky's protest against injustice and lawlessness; to find out the reasons for the protest of Vladimir Dubrovsky, to form their own attitude towards the novel by A.S. Pushkin "Dubrovsky" author's position, to the heroes of the work.

Pedagogical tasks of the lesson: contribute to the formation of an idea about A.S. Pushkin as a prose writer, author of the novel "Dubrovsky", master artistic word; create conditions for getting acquainted with the problems of the work, with the many storylines of the novel.Lesson type : setting and solving educational problems

Planned learning outcomes: For FGOS: Subject: master the skills different kind retellings, understand the role of figurative and expressive language means in creating artistic images literary workPersonal: to realize the personal meaning of the doctrine; show readiness for self-development.Metasubject : cognitive: navigate in the textbook, in the text of a work of art, answer the teacher's questions, be able to generalize, draw conclusions; be able to find the necessary information in the textbook, in the text of the novelRegulatory: organize your workplace; master the ability to understand the learning objectives of the lesson, evaluate their achievements in the lesson.Communicative: show willingness to engage in dialogue; participate in a group discussion.Methods and forms of education : frontal (conversation), individual, work in pairs, work in groups, distributive dictation, blitz survey, Comparative characteristics heroes, unfinished sentence, work with the scheme, problematic issue.

Equipment: portrait of A.S. Pushkin, the epigraph of the lesson is written on the board; presentationia to the lesson, cards for the work of each group.

I .Organizing time.

II .Checking homework A brief story about the relationship between K.P. Troekurov and A.G. Dubrovsky.(Comparative characteristics)

II .Introduction to the topic 1. Guys, have you ever encountered people who do not act according to their conscience, unfairly? 2. And how do you understand what is justice, injustice? Teacher: So, in life situations, you must always act according to your conscience, so as not to tarnish your honor.

Dictionary work

Honor - 1. Moral qualities worthy of respect and pride. 2. A good, spotless reputation of a person, a good name.

Disgrace is a desecration of honor, an insult.

3. What do you guys think, what are we going to talk about today?

IV . The topic of the lesson. “Protest by Vladimir Dubrovsky against lawlessness and injustice. Peasant Revolt"

Epigraph of the lesson “For conscience and for honor, at least take your head off” (Russian proverb)

Teacher: Today in the lesson we will analyze the actions of Vladimir, whether he is the heir to his father's attitude to honor, who protests against lawlessness and injustice, we will draw up a chain of events that allow us to reveal the character of the hero, his actions, we will answer the problematic question: are the families of Dubrovsky and Troyekurov?

V . Learning new material

1. Problematic question “Are families similar?

Kirila Petrovich Troekurov

Andrey Gavrilovich Dubrovsky

Distribution dictation (Distribute into description columns)

1….. did not understand each other. “He is wayward with his daughter. He loves to the point of madness: he caters to her whims, but at the same time is harsh and cruel. She used to hide her thoughts and feelings from him.” Father and daughter do not know and do not understand each other, there is no harmony in this family.

2. In this family there are shrines that they protect; understand and love each other.

3. In the house ..... there is a portrait of his wife ......, letters are kept that were written by her during the Turkish campaign. The memory of love is sacred here.

4. “…… I read and forgot everything in the world, plunging my soul into the world of family happiness.” He recalls his childhood with a feeling of deep tenderness: “he loved family life, managed to enjoy its quiet joys”

five. "……. although he married for love, but having become a widow, he consoled himself too quickly.

6. “... he is having a bad time with his own, but strangers will get him, so he will not only skin them, but even tear off the meat ...”

7. “Do not betray us, but we will become for you”

Kirila Petrovich Troekurov

Andrey Gavrilovich Dubrovsky

1,5,6

2,3,4,7

Output: Fates are similar, but families are different. Andrei could not even imagine that someone else would walk around the house past the portrait of his mother, where he spent his childhood, where he experienced quiet family joys happy life, so he resorts to decisive action.Mutual check (Work in pairs) Slide number 5

2.Blitz survey

1. What did Troekurov want to achieve by taking Kistenevka from Dubrovsky? (to break the pride of Andrei Grigorievich)

2. Did he succeed? 3. Why was his triumph poisoned? (He did not expect such an outcome - Dubrovsky's madness)

4. What do we learn about the state of Kirila Petrovich from the fourth chapter? (His conscience grumbled, he was not greedy, victory did not please him.)

5. Why, when describing the quarrel of the landowners, does A. Pushkin pay so much attention to K. Troekurov? (unbalanced nature, power-hungry, quick-tempered, but also quick-witted. BUT: Dubrovsky is proud, he could never forgive his offender.)

6 How did Troekurov take the news of taking possession of the estate? (Troekurov was embarrassed: “By nature he was not greedy, the desire for revenge lured him too far, his conscience murmured. He knew the state of his opponent, an old comrade of his youth, and victory did not please his heart.”) 7. What opposite feelings did Troekurov experience? (“Satisfied vengeance and lust for power to some extent drowned out nobler feelings, but the latter finally triumphed.”) 8. Why was the reconciliation of former friends impossible?
(The remorse that Troekurov experienced came too late.)

3. Analysis of the episode

I group Read the description of the autumn landscape and answer the questions . Compose TEXT. Present the work to the class. 1. What kind of life did Andrei lead in St. Petersburg? (Vladimir "was brought to St. Petersburg in the eighth year of his age", "was brought up in the cadet corps and was released as a cornet to the guard; his father spared nothing for his decent maintenance, and the young man received from home more than I should have expected.") 2. What does autumn symbolize in this episode? What role does the landscape play here? (Nature reflects the hero’s state of mind. A cold day, half-naked trees, branches that scratch his face, a stream that carries away a few faded leaves - everything speaks of the hero’s loneliness 3. How do you think the death of a father and autumn falling leaves symbolize the end of life in this 4. What feelings does Vladimir experience? (loneliness, a sense of spiritual lack of road, life passes ...)

Find epithets in this episode. How do they reveal the state of the hero? (Epithets are written on yellow leaves that are hung on the KNOWLEDGE tree)OUTPUT: The death of his father and the news from the nanny made Vladimir grow up. He carries himself resolutely and independently.After the death of his father, Vladimir Dubrovsky felt spiritual grief. Pushkin writes that Vladimir's face was terrible, that he could neither cry nor pray. The author does not directly name the feelings that the young man experienced, but we can assume that he hardened, that he experienced a feeling of wounded pride and a desire to avenge the death of his father. Christianity orders to forgive its enemies, but Vladimir Dubrovsky did not want to forgive Troekurov and therefore could not pray.

Slide №6,7II fire scene group. Retell the scene of the fire, answer the questions. Compose the TEXT of your speech and present the work of the group to the class1. How did the peasants of Dubrovsky behave when the judicial officials arrived to take away the estate? (They tried to revolt.) 2. How does Dubrovsky behave? (Vladimir stops the peasants, promises to ask for mercy from the sovereign.) 3. How does this characterize him? (Dubrovsky acts nobly, saving peasants from punishment, and officials from reprisals.) 4. What feelings does Dubrovsky experience in his father's house, where judicial officials are in charge? What does he decide on? (He worries that he will have to leave native home the one who is guilty of the death of his father, the one who ruined his family. Vladimir decides to burn down the house.)

teacher's word . Judicial officials, representatives of the law, who came to "put into possession" of Troekurov, behave defiantly. They allow shameless statements about Dubrovsky, threaten his peasants, because they feel behind their backs the strength and power, backed by Troekurov’s money. The anger and indignation of the peasants grows gradually, but the peasants experience particular indignation when an official offends Dubrovsky himself, the master and the rightful owner of the estate , and inspires the peasants that their master is Troekurov. First, a voice from the crowd answers the officials, then a murmur rises in the crowd, it intensifies and turns into the most terrible cries. The crowd is moving.

- Find and read the remark "voices from the crowd", the police officer's answer to it and the objection of the same voice. Why was the police officer so indignant at the words of the peasant?

Why does Vladimir Dubrovsky not give the angry peasants the opportunity to deal with the officials? (Question 4 of the textbook.) (Vladimir Dubrovsky does not allow angry peasants to deal with officials, because he does not want to become a toy in the hands of a crowd of peasants, does not want to become an accomplice in the massacre and hopes for the justice of the king . Takes responsibility for others, this is an Act of a Person, not a young man living on his father's money.)

III group Attitude of peasants to Vladimir. The motives of the behavior of Vladimir, the leader of the robbers? Compose the TEXT of your speech and present the work of the group to the class 1 .. Why did the yard peasants leave for Dubrovsky? (Firstly, they were devoted to their master, and secondly, they perfectly understood that Troekurov would deal with themThe peasants joined Dubrovsky because they were outraged that they were going to be commanded and disposed not by natural nobles (whose right to own land and people they considered unshakable), but by clerks, people of ignoble origin. Archip Blacksmith says:"... have you heard the case, the clerks have planned to own us, the clerks are driving our masters from the manor's court ..." The peasants perceived the insult inflicted on their master as their own insult.)
2. What idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe leader of the robbers has developed in the district? (That this is a brave, intelligent and generous person.) 3. Why didn’t the robbers touch Troekurov’s house? district. But we understand that he is mistaken. So Pushkin wanted to intrigue the reader.) 4. What circumstances forced Dubrovsky to become a robber? (He was driven by a sense of revenge, a desire to avenge injustice and cruelty, because he lost everything: home, position in society, states.)

VI .Let's consider the scheme that is in front of you: Are the values ​​of the Dubrovskys the lawlessness of Troekurov and the company?

Teacher: Vladimir protests against lawlessness, injustice, but at the same time he himself becomes a robber, committing lynching. The author is clearly on the side of the hero. A. Pushkin shows Dubrovsky as a noble, honest man who defends justice. The idea of ​​the work is that the main human values ​​are justice, honor and loyalty to the given word. We will talk about this in the next lesson. And today let's try to answer the problematic question: 1.Does the hero deserve respect? 2. Will the hero refuse revenge? What factors will influence this decision? What can change his mind?

VII. Reflection of activity

Continue the offer

"Reading Pushkin ..."

“My sympathies are with this hero because…”

“It’s hard to come to terms with the fact that….”

IX. Homework

Prepare a retelling of the episode "Lunch at Pokrovsky" on behalf of one of the characters

Answer in writing to question No. 1 (Chapter VII) page 139

SCHEME. Are the values ​​of the Dubrovskys the lawlessness of Troekurov and company?

Protests against lawlessness, arbitrariness,

injustice. Tries to change his fate

father died

Vladimir's condition after the death of his father

Son of an old nobleman

Preserves human dignity. Terrible and honest "robber"

Lost

Kistenevka

Burned the estate:

HOLY FAMILY

Forces himself to be respected.

Modest and courageous Deforge

The attitude of the peasants towards Vladimir, and therefore the people

Does the hero deserve respect?

Will the hero refuse revenge? What factors will influence this decision?

How can one explain the rudeness and willfulness of Troekurov? (2nd question of the textbook).

“The neighbors were glad to cater to his slightest whims; provincial officials trembled at his name; Kirila Petrovich accepted signs of servility as a proper tribute ... ”Troekurov’s rudeness and willfulness can be explained by great wealth and unlimited power over people. It can be said that he treated his guests in the same way as his serfs. He believed that he could buy everything, and humiliated the dignity of people.

We will ask the children to find the answers to the 3rd question of the textbook directly in the text:

What kind of person was Kirila Petrovich at home? What did his usual “occupations” consist of?

“In domestic life, Kirila Petrovich showed all the vices of an uneducated person. Spoiled by everything that only surrounded him, he was used to giving full rein to all the impulses of his ardent disposition and all the undertakings of a rather limited mind. Troekurov drank every evening and suffered from gluttony twice a week. “Troekurov’s constant occupations consisted of traveling around his vast possessions, in lengthy feasts and pranks, moreover, invented daily ...”

Questions 4, 5, 6 of the textbook help us characterize two landlord neighbors, identify their similarities and differences.

Troyekurov, "arrogant in dealings with people of the highest rank," respected Dubrovsky, because "he knew from experience the impatience and decisiveness of his character." Dubrovsky was the only one of the people around him who behaved proudly, was independent and refused the patronage of his former colleague.

Troekurov and Dubrovsky "partially resembled both in characters and inclinations." This similarity was manifested in pride, but Troekurov maintained this feeling in himself with an awareness of wealth and power, and Dubrovsky - with an awareness of the antiquity of his family and noble honor. Both landowners had a hot, quick-tempered character. Both loved dog hunting and kept dogs.

An incident in the kennel characterizes Dubrovsky as a proud man who does not want to turn into a jester who has a sense of his own dignity. Dubrovsky assessed the psar's remark as an insult to noble honor by a serf.

What do you think, if Troekurov were visiting a richer and nobler person who would offend his dignity, how would Troekurov act in this case?

Choose a quote that matches the drawing by B. M. Kustodiev (p. 68 of the textbook).

What method of revenge did Troekurov choose?

What was the main law of Kirila Petrovich?

It is important that the students, answering this question, find the most expressive phrase that characterizes Troekurov: “That is the power to take away the estate without any right.”

How did Shabashkin act on behalf of Troekurov?

Let us conclude that for the assessor, assistant judge, who was a representative of the law, money became the main law of life.
Chapter II

Officials of the district court met Dubrovsky and Troekurov in different ways. No one paid any attention to Dubrovsky. When Kirila Petrovich arrived, the clerks “got up and put the feathers behind his ear. Members greeted him with an expression of deep servility, moved him a chair out of respect for his rank, years and stoutness.

The picture of the court evokes a feeling of annoyance, pity for Dubrovsky, indignation against the triumph of Troekurov and protest against the servility and subservience of the judges. Pushkin emphasizes the unnaturalness of this trial with such details: the assessor addresses Troekurov with a low bow, and Dubrovsky is simply presented with a paper; At the same time, Troekurov is sitting in an armchair, and Dubrovsky is standing, leaning against the wall.

"Dubrovsky's sudden madness had a strong effect" on Troekurov's imagination and "poisoned his triumph" because he did not manage to see how Dubrovsky was humiliated. He went mad, but his pride and honor were not broken.

I. Father and son

Commented reading

Vladimir Dubrovsky led a life in St. Petersburg, in his opinion, a decent one for a Guards officer. His father sent him money, leaving almost nothing for himself, and Dubrovsky, a wasteful and ambitious young man, "allowed himself luxurious whims, played cards and entered into debts, not caring about the future." He hoped for his father and that he could find himself a rich bride.

Dubrovsky received the news of his father's illness "with unusual emotion." He was horrified by the situation of his father, and he "reproached himself for criminal negligence." Dubrovsky's character showed love for his family and readiness to help his father.

The dialogue between Vladimir Dubrovsky and the coachman Anton can be read by roles.

Yards and peasants did not like and were afraid of Troekurov. The coachman Anton told Dubrovsky that Troyekurov “has a bad time with his own people, but strangers will get it, so he will not only skin them, but even tear off the meat.”

Dubrovsky is a person who has a sense of his own dignity, and such a person will not humiliate the dignity of another. Dubrovsky was fair to his serfs, and they did not want another master.

Reading the description of Pokrovsky and Kistenevka, we ask:

How did Dubrovsky Sr. meet his son?

Homework

Prepare a retelling of the episode "Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate".
Individual task

Prepare an expressive reading of chapter VIII.

Lesson 23

Protest by Vladimir Dubrovsky against lawlessness and injustice.

Peasant riot
I. Vladimir Dubrovsky's protest against lawlessness and injustice. Peasant riot

Conversation

We talk about the questions of the textbook for the chapters that were assigned to read at home (pp. 146-147, part 1).

If chapter III has been read and commented on in the previous lesson, we begin the conversation on questions with chapter IV. It is important that students master the work with the text, learn to confirm their thoughts with quotes.

How did Troekurov take the news of taking possession of the estate?

Troekurov was embarrassed: “By nature, he was not greedy, the desire for revenge lured him too far, his conscience murmured. He knew the condition of his opponent, an old comrade of his youth, and the victory did not please his heart.

What opposing feelings did Troekurov experience? "Satisfied vengeance and lust for power drowned out to some extent nobler feelings, but the latter finally triumphed."

Why reconciliation of former friends was impossible?

The remorse that Troekurov experienced came too late.

Chapter V

After the death of his father, Vladimir Dubrovsky felt spiritual grief. Pushkin writes that Vladimir's face was terrible, that he could neither cry nor pray. The author does not directly name the feelings that the young man experienced, but we can assume that he hardened, that he experienced a feeling of wounded pride and a desire to avenge the death of his father. Christianity orders to forgive its enemies, but Vladimir Dubrovsky did not want to forgive Troekurov and therefore could not pray.

Find and read the episode in which the feelings of Vladimir Dubrovsky are revealed. What technique does the author use to describe the state of the hero?

Pushkin conveys Dubrovsky's experiences with the help of a description of the thicket where he went after the funeral. Vladimir walked more often, not understanding the road, "... the branches constantly touched and scratched him, his legs constantly got stuck in the swamp, he did not notice anything."

Just as Dubrovsky could not make out the roads in the thicket, so he could not make out his confused feelings: “... thoughts one another were more gloomy in his soul ... He strongly felt his loneliness.”

In the passage describing Vladimir in the middle of the forest, find epithets. How do they help the reader understand the state of the hero? (From the words: "Finally he reached ..." to "He strongly felt his loneliness.")

How do the officials of the judiciary behave when they come to "take possession" of Troyekurov? (2nd question of the textbook.)

Judicial officials, representatives of the law, who came to "put into possession" of Troekurov, behave defiantly. They allow shameless statements about Dubrovsky, threaten his peasants, because they feel behind their backs the strength and power, backed up by Troekurov's money.

The anger and indignation of the peasants grows gradually, but the peasants experience particular indignation when an official insults Dubrovsky himself, the master and the rightful owner of the estate, and inspires the peasants that their master is Troekurov. First, a voice from the crowd answers the officials, then a murmur rises in the crowd, it intensifies and turns into the most terrible cries. The crowd is moving.

Why does Vladimir Dubrovsky not give the angry peasants the opportunity to deal with the officials? (4th question of the textbook.)

Vladimir Dubrovsky does not allow angry peasants to deal with officials, because he does not want to become a toy in the hands of a crowd of peasants, does not want to become an accomplice in the massacre and hopes for the justice of the king.

Chapter VI

Vladimir Dubrovsky came to the decision to burn down the “sad house” after he saw the portrait of his mother in a new way, read her letters to his father, where she talked about her little son, and heard the voices of clerks who demanded one or the other, with their presence and behavior desecrating the bright memory of Dubrovsky's father and mother. Let's help schoolchildren see the antithesis in the second paragraph of the chapter: "the world of family happiness", which Dubrovsky plunged into while reading his mother's letters, is opposed to reality, in which Vladimir Dubrovsky sees the trampled honor of his father and the defiant behavior of clerks.

What prompted the peasants to join Dubrovsky? (2nd question of the textbook.)

The peasants joined Dubrovsky because they were outraged that they were going to be commanded and disposed not by natural nobles (whose right to own land and people they considered unshakable), but by clerks, people of ignoble origin. Arkhip the blacksmith says: "... have you heard the case, the clerks have planned to own us, the clerks are driving our masters from the manor's court ..." The peasants perceived the insult inflicted on their master as their own insult.

Why does the blacksmith Arkhip destroy the clerks, but saves the cat at the risk of his own life? (3rd question of the textbook.)

The 3rd question is quite difficult for sixth graders. The blacksmith Arkhip destroys the clerks, but at the risk of his life he saves the cat from the roof of the burning barn. He tells the children who laugh at the miserable animal: “You are not afraid of God: God’s creature is dying, and you are foolishly rejoicing ...” Arkhip perceives the cat as God’s creature, saving which will be a matter pleasing to God, but he does not perceive clerks as people, worthy of salvation: in his understanding, they violated the law established by God and the king. Helping Troekurov to administer an unjust judgment, they violated God's commandments: they helped one person steal property from another, they lied and violated the oath, according to which they were obliged to tell the truth.

Let us pay attention to the speech characteristics of Arkhip the blacksmith in his conversation with Egorovna:

“Arkhipushka,” Yegorovna told him, “save them, damned ones, God will reward you.

How not so, - answered the blacksmith.

Where have we heard these words before?

Let us conclude that in the scene with the clerks (Chapter V) the "voice from the crowd" belonged to the blacksmith.

Consider the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate” (p. 93 of the textbook).

Make up a story based on this picture.

In the illustration by D. A. Shmarinov “Fire in the Dubrovsky Estate”, a young gentleman Vladimir Andreevich Dubrovsky is depicted in the center of the drawing. He seemed to have just brought a torch to the hay, which flared up brightly; "The flames went up and lit up the whole house." Dubrovsky took off his cap, saying goodbye to his home, and looks at the fire. To his left, leaning on his arm, is the nanny Orina Egorovna Buzyreva, in a white scarf and apron, her head sadly bowed. Behind it we recognize the figures of the Dubrovsky serfs: this is the coachman Anton with black hair and a beard, the fair-haired Grisha, the son of Yegorovna, and - behind the figure of Anton - the blacksmith Arkhip, who locked the clerks with a key, but at the risk of his life saved the cat from the roof of the burning barn .

On the left we see the fire of the fire. Tongues of flame reach out towards Dubrovsky. Horses stand in the background, above a group of people, sparks from a fire fly up to a black sky.

The whole figure of Dubrovsky expresses pride and a sense of inner dignity. The figures of serfs express a gloomy determination to follow their proud master: "...we will die, we will not leave you, we will go with you."

II.Commented reading
Chapter VII

Pupils read chapter VII.

Commenting on the chapter, let's say that Vladimir Dubrovsky was forced to become a robber by the death of his father and the lack of means of subsistence, but the main reason is that, knowing the greed and venality of officials, he lost hope in a fair court decision and did not even hope to find protection from the king, because that money was needed for this, but Dubrovsky did not have it.
Chapter VIII

The student who completed the individual task reads expressively chapter VIII or the episode "Deforge in the bear's room" (from the words: "In the courtyard of Kirila Petrovich ...").

What qualities did Desforges show in the bear room?

What fact made an indelible impression on Marya Kirilovna? How has Marya Kirilovna's attitude towards Deforge changed?
Homework

Prepare an expressive reading of chapters IX-XI. Answer the textbook questions for the relevant chapters (pp. 147-148).

Lesson 24

The surrounding nobility visiting Troekurov. Despotism of the master

disrespect for the human person. cowardice, servility,

the greed of Anton Pafnutich Spitsyn. Composition
I. The surrounding nobility visiting Troekurov. Despotism of the owner, disrespect for the human person
Chapter IX

The lesson begins with an expressive reading of chapter IX. Then we talk about:

How does Spitsyn explain his lateness?

What act does Spitsyn consider to be an act "according to conscience and justice"? What really motivated Anton Pafnutich?

How does the owner behave during dinner? Pay attention to his dialogue with the police officer.

What qualities does Troekurov show during dinner?

We will help schoolchildren to answer that Troekurov treats his guests rudely and arbitrarily, mocks them, humiliates their human dignity (“We know you; where do you spend money, you live at home as a pig as a pig ...”).

“The police officer got scared, bowed, smiled, stammered, and finally said:

Let's try, Your Excellency"?

Compare the stories of Spitsyn and Globovoy. What characteristic of Dubrovsky does each of them give?

Anton Pafnutich Spitsyn in his story says about Dubrovsky: "He is not a small mistake, he will not let anyone down, and he will probably tear off two skins from me."

Anna Savishna Globova does not give a direct description of Dubrovsky, but retells the words of the visiting general: “... Dubrovsky does not attack everyone, but famous rich people, but even here he shares with them, and does not rob completely, and no one accuses him of murders. ..” Globova says: “I guessed who His Excellency was, there was nothing for me to talk to him.” But in the words of the landowner, one can feel some sympathy and respect for the person who exposed the trickery of the clerk and thus returned her money.

The author introduces the stories of Spitsyn and Globova into the narrative in order to show the idea that the surrounding landowners have about Dubrovsky, to express people's conflicting feelings about the robber involuntarily, to more fully present the appearance of the main character to readers. The author uses the antithesis to show the cowardice of Anton Pafnutich and the dignified behavior of Anna Savishna.

What did Troekurov say when the police officer read Dubrovsky's signs? Why did Troekurov come to this conclusion?

What qualities did Dubrovsky show during the festive dinner in Pokrovsky? Why didn't any of the guests guess that Deforge was Dubrovsky?

None of Troekurov's guests guessed that Deforge was Dubrovsky, because no one could even expect that Troekurov's enemy would be at his house in the role of a French teacher. Dubrovsky did not give himself away. He did not react to stories about himself and spoke only with Sasha and only in French. No one even suspected that he knew Russian.

II. Cowardice, servility, greed Anton Pafnutich Spitsyn
Chapter X

What did Troekurov do when some of the guests wanted to go home?

How has the character of the evening changed since Troyekurov left?

Why did Spitsyn decide to spend the night with Deforge? Pupils read expressively chapter X (from the words "Coming to the wing ..." to the end).

What qualities of his character does Anton Pafnutich show?
III. Composition

Chapter XI

How did Dubrovsky become Deforge?

Let the students briefly answer this question.

Dubrovsky at the post station met a Frenchman who was on his way to Troekurov's to serve as a teacher for little Sasha. Dubrovsky offered the Frenchman money to give him all the documents and immediately left for France. The French agreed. So Dubrovsky became Deforge.

During his stay at the Troekurov estate, Dubrovsky showed restraint, composure, acting qualities, nobility and self-control.

Why did A. S. Pushkin violate the sequence of presentation?

Pushkin broke the sequence of events so that the reader feels like a dinner guest who listens to talk about Dubrovsky and does not know that he is sitting next to him; so that the reader experiences the same surprise as Anton Pafnutich, who is deprived of his precious bag. Pushkin wanted to create a mystery, intrigue, and he succeeded.
Homework

Draw up (in writing) a plan of the main events of chapters VIII-XI. Read chapter XII.

Lesson 25

Composition. Plot. Romantic love story of Vladimir and Masha
I. Composition. Plot

Let's ask the student to write on the blackboard the plan of events drawn up at home for chapters VIII-XI.

Plan of the main events of chapters VIII-XI

1) The French teacher arrived in Pokrovskoye.

2) Kirila Petrovich's conversation with a Frenchman.

3) "Noble amusements of the Russian master."

4) Deforge kills the bear.

5) "... The guests began to arrive."

6) Festive dinner at Pokrovsky.

7) The stories of Spitsyn and Globovoy.

8) Signs of Dubrovsky.

9) The end of the holiday.

10) Anton Pafnutich goes to bed in Dubrovsky's room.

11) Deforge-Dubrovsky robs Spitsyn.

12) The French teacher is waiting for the horses in the caretaker's house.

13) Dubrovsky buys documents from a Frenchman.

14) Dubrovsky, with the Frenchman's papers, comes to Troekurov and becomes Sasha's teacher.

15) Morning departure of the robbed Spitsyn.

Working collectively, to the right of the records with numbers (colored pencil or green pen) we denote the true course of events.

We have restored plot of the work.

* Plot - the sequence and connection of events in a work of art.

Pushkin breaks the temporal sequence of events in order to create a mystery, intrigue, and arouse intense interest in readers.

We read the article of the textbook "Composition" (pp. 149-150). We write out the definition of composition.

* Composition - this is the construction of a work of art, the location and interconnection of all its parts, images, episodes.
II. Romantic love story of Vladimir and Masha

Why did Dubrovsky look for opportunities to settle in Troekurov's house and abandoned his plans for revenge?

Remember how Masha first treated Deforge. Why?

What event made her change her attitude towards the teacher?

How did she feel when she received the note from Desforges?

How did Masha think through her behavior on a date? Did she manage to behave the way she wanted?

Find the words of Dubrovsky explaining the refusal of revenge.

“I realized that the house where you live is sacred, that not a single creature connected with you by ties of blood is subject to my curse. I have given up vengeance as madness."

What promise did Marya Kirilovna give to Dubrovsky?

Sixth graders may not immediately understand what it means to promise not to reject devotion. Let's tell them that in medieval Europe there was a tradition of chivalrous service to your lady, not demanding anything from her, except that the lady accepted the devotion of her knight. Dubrovsky understands that Marya Kirilovna cannot become his wife. He only wants to serve her and asks her not to reject his help. This is the kind of love we call now romantic.

Why was Dubrovsky forced to flee Pokrovsky?

How did Troekurov part with his guests?

Let's ask the students to remember how Troekurov ordered the gates to be locked so that the guests could not go home on the day of the temple feast in Pokrovsky. Let's compare this act with how Troekurov at eleven o'clock, being out of sorts, dispersed the guests to their homes. Let us draw a conclusion about Troekurov's despotism and tyranny.
Homework

Lesson 26

Image of the Russian nobility. Troekurov and the prince

Vereisky. The fate of Marya Kirilovna and Dubrovsky
I. Image of the Russian nobility. Troekurov and Prince Vereisky. The fate of Marya Kirilovna

Textbook Conversation

How do you imagine Prince Vereisky? What makes him related to Troekurov and what is their difference?

Prince Vereisky is a man of fifty, but seems "much older". Pushkin writes:

“Excesses of every kind exhausted his health and put their indelible mark on him. Despite the fact that his appearance was pleasant, remarkable, and the habit of being always in society gave him a certain courtesy, especially with women. He had an incessant need for distraction and was incessantly bored.

The prince was an empty man. He spent his whole life abroad, lived on the money that the clerk from the estate sent him, and for the first time came to look at this estate at the age of fifty. In this he differs from his neighbor: Kirila Petrovich Troekurov lived on his estate and managed the household himself. But Troekurov also exhausted himself with all sorts of excesses: remember that he was tipsy every evening and suffered from gluttony twice a week.

The two neighbors are also related by the fact that each of them cared only about his own well-being and believed that all the others were created to serve them and give pleasure.

How did Kirila Petrovich treat his daughter and how did he dispose of her fate?

Kirila Petrovich treated his daughter as property and, without her consent, decided to marry Marya Kirilovna to the prince, who was much older than her. Masha's emotional experiences were an unfortunate misunderstanding for him. He considered only the question of dowry to be a matter of business.

To illustrate the conversation between Marya Kirilovna and her father, the teacher can use a reproduction of the painting by F. S. Zhuravlev "Before the Crown", stored in the State Tretyakov Gallery. The painting depicts a young girl in a wedding dress decorated with flowers. She kneels before her father, covering her face with her hands. Her father apparently informs her that his decision is final.

Retell the episode with the ring.

How did Mitya and Sasha behave during the interrogation?

Mitya and Sasha behaved differently during the interrogation. When Sasha let it slip, Kirila Petrovich realized that Marya Kirilovna was involved in the matter, and began to threaten Sasha that he would flog him with rods. Sasha was frightened and gradually, word for word, told about the request of his sister.

When Troekurov's attention turned to Mitya, he replied that he was "a yard man of the Dubrovskys." It was a very bold answer, because after the court decision, Dubrovsky's serfs belonged to Troekurov. To Troekurov's next question, the boy answered "with great indifference" that he "stole raspberries." Mitya didn't say another word after that. He took on the "look of a real fool" and did not respond to Troekurov's threats.

Troekurov and the police officer released Mitya to track down where he would run: "He will help us catch the ataman himself." The consequence of this was that the bandit camp was discovered and the soldiers attacked it.

After Dubrovsky confessed his love to Marya Kirilovna, she promised to call Dubrovsky for help if necessary. However, she herself, in desperation, told her father that she could resort to the intercession of Dubrovsky. The father did everything possible to prevent this from happening. Marya Kirilovna could not leave the house to warn Dubrovsky, she could not put the ring in the hollow of the oak in time. Marya Kirilovna did not dare to tell her father in time that she did not want to marry Vereisky, did not dare to say "no" in church. She waited for a mysterious romantic deliverer, having done nothing for her own deliverance. When Dubrovsky and his people stopped the carriage, she reproached him for not coming on time, and said: “I agreed, I took an oath ...”

Maria Kirilovna refused Dubrovsky's help because she was married and could no longer act according to her will. Marya Kirilovna became a princess and a rich woman. Only after the death of her old husband would she gain independence.

If possible, the teacher will show the students a reproduction of the painting by V. V. Pukirev “Unequal Marriage”. The social types of this picture are somewhat different from those of Pushkin: a wealthy official cynically buys himself a young wife, a dowry bride; but the lack of rights of women of that time in Russia remains unchanged.

Consider the illustration by E. E. Lansere (p. 140, part 1 of the textbook). What phrase from the novel "Dubrovsky" could be called her? Describe what you see in this illustration.

II. The fate of Dubrovsky